Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/2/10.1121/1.4926904
1.
1. Beaman, C. P. , and Holt, N. J. (2007). “ Reverberant auditory Environments: The effects of multiple echoes on distraction by ‘irrelevant’ speech,” Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 21, 10771090.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.1315
2.
3. Bregman, A. S. , and Rudnicky, A. I. (1975). “ Auditory segregation: Stream or streams?,” J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 1, 263267.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.1.3.263
3.
4. Colle, H. A. (1980). “ Auditory encoding in visual short-term recall: Effects of noise intensity and spatial location,” J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 19, 722735.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90403-X
4.
5. Ebissou, A. , Chevret, P. , and Parizet, E. (2013). “ Work performance and mental workload in multiple talker environments,” in International Congress on Acoustics 2013, December 2012, Montréal, Canada, No. 4pNSa8.
5.
6. Ellermeier, W. , and Hellbrück, J. (1998). “ Is level irrelevant in ‘Irrelevant Speech'? Effects of loudness, signal-to-noise ratio, and binaural unmasking,” J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 24, 14061414.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.5.1406
6.
7. Haapakangas, A. , Kankkunen, E. , Hongisto, V. , Virjonen, P. , Oliva, D. , and Keskinen, E. (2011). “ Effects of five speech masking sounds on performance and acoustic satisfaction. Implications for open-plan offices,” Acta Acust. Acust. 97, 641655.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3813/AAA.918444
7.
8. Hagerman, B. (1982). “ Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise,” Scand. J. Audiol. 11, 7987.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/01050398209076203
8.
9. Haka, M. , Haapakangas, A. , Keränen, J. , Hakala, J. , Keskinen, E. , and Hongisto, V. (2009). “ Performance effects and subjective disturbance of speech in acoustically different office types—A laboratory experiment,” Indoor Air 19, 454467.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2009.00608.x
9.
10. Halin, N. , Marsh, J. E. , Haga, A. , Holmgren, M. , and Sörqvist, P. (2013). “ Effects of speech on proofreading: Can task-engagement manipulations shield against distraction?,” J. Exp. Psychol.: Appl. 20, 6980.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xap0000002
10.
11. Halin, N. , Marsh, J. E. , Hellman, A. , Hellström, I. , and Sörqvist, P. (2014). “ A shield against distraction,” J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cognit. 3, 3136.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.01.003
11.
12. Hellbrück, J. , and Kilcher, H. (1993). “Effects on mental tasks induced by noise recorded and presented via an artificial head system,” in Noise and Man' 93, edited by M. Vallet ( Institut National de Recherche sur les Transports, Leur Securite, Arcueil, France), pp. 315322.
12.
13.IEC (2011). IEC 60268-16, Sound System Equipment—Part 16: Objective Rating of Speech Intelligibility by Speech Transmission Index, 4th ed. ( IEC, Geneva, Swizerland).
13.
14.ISO (2012). ISO 3382-3:2012, Acoustics—Measurement of Room Acoustic Parameters—Part 3: Open Plan Offices ( International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland).
14.
16. Jahncke, H. , Hongisto, V. , and Virjonen, P. (2013). “ Cognitive performance during irrelevant speech: Effects of speech intelligibility and office-task characteristics,” Appl. Acoust. 74(3), 307316.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2012.08.007
15.
17. Jahncke, H. , Hygge, S. , Halin, N. , Green, A-M. , and Dimberg, K. (2011). “ Open-plan office noise: Cognitive performance and restoration,” J. Env. Psychol. 31, 373382.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.07.002
16.
18. Jiang, B. , Liebl, A. , Leistner, P. , and Yang, J. (2011). “ Sound masking performance of time-reversed masker processed from the target speech,” Acta Acust. Acust. 98, 135141.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3813/AAA.918499
17.
19. Jones, D. M. , and Macken, W. J. (1993). “ Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect: Implications for phonological coding in working memory,” J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cognit. 19, 369381.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.2.369
18.
20. Jones, D. M. , and Macken, W. J. (1995). “ Auditory babble and cognitive efficiency: Role of number of voices and their location,” J. Exp. Psychol.: Appl. 1, 216226.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.1.3.216
19.
21. Jones, D. M. , Marsh, J. E. , and Hughes, R. W. (2012). “ Retrieval from Memory: Vulnerable or Inviolable?,” J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cognit. 38, 905922.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0026781
20.
22. Jones, D. M. , Miles, C. , and Page, J. (1990). “ Disruption of proofreading by irrelevant speech: Effects of attention, arousal or memory?,” Appl. Cognit. Psychol. 4, 89108.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350040203
21.
23. Jones, D. M. , and Tremblay, S. (2000). “ Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000),” Psychon. Bull. Rev. 7, 550558.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03214370
22.
24. Jorgensen, S. , Ewert, S. D. , and Dau, T. (2013). “ A multi-resolution envelope-power based model for speech intelligibility,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 134, 436446.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4807563
23.
25. Keus van de Poll, M. , Ljung, R. , Odelius, J. , and Sörqvist, P. (2014). “ Disruption of writing by background speech: The role of speech transmission index,” Appl. Acoust. 81, 1518.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.02.005
24.
26. Kim, J. , and de Dear, R. (2013). “ Workspace satisfaction: The privacy-communication trade-off in open-plan offices,” J. Environ. Psychol. 36, 1826.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.06.007
25.
27. Kittel, M. , Wenzke, E. , Drotleff, H. , and Liebl, A. (2013). “ Auditory babble as a masker of disruptive speech,” in Proceedings of Internoise, September 15–18, Innsbruck, Austria.
26.
28. Loewen, L. J. , and Suedfeld, P. (1992). “ Cognitive and arousal effects of masking office noise,” Environ. Behav. 24, 381395.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916592243006
27.
29. Marsh, J. E. , Hughes, R. W. , and Jones D. M. (2008). “ Auditory distraction in semantic memory: A process-based approach,” J. Mem. Lang. 58, 682700.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.05.002
28.
30. Marsh, J. E. , Hughes, R. W. , and Jones, D. M. (2009). “ Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction,” Cognition 110, 2338.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.003
29.
31. Marsh, J. E. , and Jones, D. M. (2010). “ Cross-modal distraction by background speech: What role for meaning?,” Noise Health 12, 210216.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.70499
30.
32. Martin, R. C. , Wogalter, M. S. , and Forlano, J. G. (1988). “ Reading comprehension in the presence of unattended speech and music,” J. Mem. Lang. 27, 382398.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(88)90063-0
31.
33. Park, M. , Kohlrausch, A. , and van Leest, A. (2013). “ Irrelevant speech effect under stationary and adaptive masking conditions,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 134, 19701981.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4816939
32.
34. Payton, K. L. , and Shrestha, M. (2013). “ Comparison of a short-time speech-based intelligibility metric to the speech transmission index and intelligibility data,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 134, 38183827.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4821216
33.
35. Perham, N. , Banbury, S. , and Jones, D. M. (2005). “ Auditory distraction impairs analytical reasoning performance,” Aust. J. Psychol. 57, 242242.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00049530600940010
34.
36. Perham, N. , Banbury, S. , and Jones, D. M. (2007). “ Do realistic reverberation levels reduce auditory distraction?,” Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 21, 839847.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.1300
35.
37. Perham, N. , and Currie, H. (2014). “ Does listening to preferred music improve reading comprehension performance?,” Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 28, 279284.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.2994
36.
38. Perham, N. , and Sykora, M. (2012). “ Disliked music can be better for performance than liked music,” Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 26, 550555.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.2826
37.
39. Ransdell, S. , Levy, C. M. , and Kellogg, R. T. (2002). “ The structure of writing processes as revealed by secondary task demands,” L1-Educat. Stud. Lang. Lit. 2, 141163.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1020851300668
38.
40. Rheberger, K. S. , and Versfeld, N. J. (2005). “ A Speech Intelligibility Index-based approach to predict the speech reception threshold for sentences in fluctuating noise for normal-hearing listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 21812192.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1861713
39.
41. Schlittmeier, S. J. , and Hellbrück, J. (2009). “ Background music as noise abatement in open-plan offices: A laboratory study on performance effects and subjective preferences,” Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 23, 684697.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.1498
40.
42. Schlittmeier, S. J. , Hellbrück, J. , and Klatte, M. (2008). “ Does irrelevant music cause an irrelevant sound effect for auditory items?,” Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 20, 252271.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09541440701427838
41.
43. Schlittmeier, S. J. , Hellbrück, J. , Thaden, R. , and Vorländer, M. (2008). “ The impact of background speech varying in intelligibility: Effects on cognitive performance and perceived disturbance,” Ergonomics 51, 719736.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140130701745925
42.
44. Sörqvist, P. , Halin, N. , and Hygge, S. (2010). “ Individual differences in susceptibility to the effects of speech on reading comprehension,” Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 24, 6776.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.1543
43.
45. Sörqvist, P. , Marsh, J. E. , and Jahncke, H. (2010). “ Hemispheric asymmetries in auditory distraction,” Brain Cognit. 74, 7987.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2010.06.007
44.
46. Sörqvist, P. , Nöstl, A. , and Halin, N. (2012). “ Disruption of writing processes by the semanticity of background speech,” Scand. J. Psychol. 53, 97102.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00936.x
45.
47. Venetjoki, N. , Kaarlela-Tuomaala, A. , Keskinen, E. , and Hongisto, V. (2006). “ The effect of speech and speech intelligibility on task performance,” Ergonomics 49, 10681091.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140130600679142
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/2/10.1121/1.4926904
Loading
/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/2/10.1121/1.4926904
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/2/10.1121/1.4926904
2015-08-17
2016-09-28

Abstract

Broadband noise is often used as a masking sound to combat the negative consequences of background speech on performance in open-plan offices. As office workers generally dislike broadband noise, it is important to find alternatives that are more appreciated while being at least not less effective. The purpose of experiment 1 was to compare broadband noise with two alternatives—multiple voices and water waves—in the context of a serial short-term memory task. A single voice impaired memory in comparison with silence, but when the single voice was masked with multiple voices, performance was on level with silence. Experiment 2 explored the benefits of multiple-voice masking in more detail (by comparing one voice, three voices, five voices, and seven voices) in the context of word processed writing (arguably a more office-relevant task). Performance (i.e., writing fluency) increased linearly from worst performance in the one-voice condition to best performance in the seven-voice condition. Psychological mechanisms underpinning these effects are discussed.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/asa/journal/jasa/138/2/1.4926904.html;jsessionid=xIj_dQzeKV4tfNF8Kl2FmtHh.x-aip-live-03?itemId=/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/2/10.1121/1.4926904&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/asa/journal/jasa
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=asadl.org/jasa/138/2/10.1121/1.4926904&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/2/10.1121/1.4926904'
Right1,Right2,Right3,