No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Beating the bounds: Localized timing cues to word segmentation
2. Beckman, M. E. (1992). “ Evidence for speech rhythms across languages,” in Speech Perception, Production and Linguistic Structure, edited by Y. Tohkura, E. Vatikiotis-Bateson, and Y. Sagisaka ( IOS Press, Oxford, UK), pp. 457–463.
3. Benavides-Varela, S. , Hochmann, J. R. , Macagno, F. , Nespor, M. , and Mehler, J. (2012). “ Newborn's brain activity signals the origin of word memories,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 17908–17913.
4. Bion, R. A. , Benavides-Varela, S. , and Nespor, M. (2011). “ Acoustic markers of prominence influence infants' and adults' segmentation of speech sequences,” Lang. Speech 54, 123–140.
5. Bonatti, L. L. , Pena, M. , Nespor, M. , and Mehler, J. (2005). “ Linguistic constraints on statistical computations. The role of consonants and vowels in continuous speech processing,” Psychol. Sci. 16, 451–459.
6. Byrd, D. , Lee, S. , Riggs, D. , and Adams, J. (2005). “ Interacting effects of syllable and phrase position on consonant articulation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 3860–3873.
7. Cho, T. , McQueen, J. , and Cox, E. (2007). “ Prosodically driven detail in speech processing: The case of domain-initial strengthening in English,” J. Phonet. 35, 210–243.
8. Christophe, A. , Peperkamp, S. , Pallier, C. , Block, E. , and Mehler, J. (2004). “ Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access. I. Adult data,” J. Mem. Lang. 51, 523–547.
9. Cooper, A. M. , Whalen, D. H. , and Fowler, C. A. (1986). “ P-centers are unaffected by phonetic categorization,” Percept. Psychophys. 39, 187–196.
11. Davis, M. H. , Marslen-Wilson, W. D. , and Gaskell, M. G. (2002). “ Leading up the lexical garden path: Segmentation and ambiguity in spoken word recognition,” J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 28, 218–244.
13. Dutoit, T. , Pagel, V. , Pierret, N. , Bataille, F. , and Van Der Vreken, O. (1996). “ The MBROLA project: Towards a set of high-quality speech synthesizers free of use for non-commercial purposes,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Philadelphia, pp. 1393–1396.
14. Fougeron, C. , and Keating, P. A. (1997). “ Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 3728–3740.
15. Fowler, C. A. (1990). “ Lengthenings and the nature of prosodic constituency: Comments on Beckman and Edwards's paper,” in Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and the Physics of Speech, edited by J. Kingston and M. E. Beckman ( Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), pp. 201–207.
17. Gow, D. W. , and Gordon, P. C. (1995). “ Lexical and prelexical influences on word segmentation: Evidence from priming,” J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 21, 344–359.
18. Hay, J. S. , and Diehl, R. L. (2007). “ Perception of rhythmic grouping: Testing the iambic/trochaic law,” Percept. Psychophys. 69, 113–122.
19. Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies ( University of Chicago Press, Chicago), pp. 1–455.
21. Keating, P. A. , Cho, T. , Fougeron, C. , and Hsu, C. (2003). “ Domain-initial strengthening in four languages,” in Papers in Laboratory Phonology 6, edited by J. Local, R. Ogden, and R. Temple ( Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), pp. 145–163.
22. Keating, P. , Wright, R. , and Zhang, J. (1999). “ Word-level asymmetries in consonant articulation,” UCLA Work. Pap. Phonet. 97, 157–173.
23. Kim, S. , Broersma, M. , and Cho, T. (2012a). “ The use of prosodic cues in learning new words in an unfamiliar language,” Stud. Second Lang. Acquisit. 34, 415–444.
24. Kim, S. , Cho, T. , and McQueen, J. M. (2012b). “ Phonetic richness can outweigh prosodically driven phonological knowledge when learning words in an artificial language,” J. Phonet. 40, 443–452.
25. Ladd, D. R. (1996). Intonational Phonology ( Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), pp. 1–334.
28. Oller, D. K. (1973). “ The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 54, 1235–1247.
29. Price, P. J. , Ostendorf, M. , Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. , and Fong, C. (1991). “ The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90, 2956–2970.
30. Quené, H. (1992). “ Durational cues for word segmentation in Dutch,” J. Phonet. 20, 331–350.
31. Reinisch, E. , Jesse, A. , and McQueen, J. M. (2011). “ Speaking rate from proximal and distal contexts is used during word segmentation,” J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 37, 978–996.
35. Shatzman, K. B. , and McQueen, J. M. (2006). “ Segment duration as a cue to word boundaries in spoken-word recognition,” Percept. Psychophys. 68, 1–16.
40. Tyler, M. D. , and Cutler, A. (2009). “ Cross-language differences in cue use for speech segmentation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 367–376.
43. Wightman, C. W. , Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. , Ostendorf, M. , and Price, P. J. (1992). “ Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 1707–1717.
Article metrics loading...
Prosody facilitates perceptual segmentation of the speech stream into a sequence of words and phrases. With regard to speech timing, vowel lengthening is well established as a cue to an upcoming boundary, but listeners' exploitation of consonant lengthening for segmentation has not been systematically tested in the absence of other boundary cues. In a series of artificial language learning experiments, the impact of durational variation in consonants and vowels on listeners' extraction of novel trisyllables was examined. Language streams with systematic lengthening of word-initial consonants were better recalled than both control streams without localized lengthening and streams where word-initial syllable lengthening was confined to the vocalic rhyme. Furthermore, where vowel-consonant sequences were lengthened word-medially, listeners failed to learn the languages effectively. Thus the structural interpretation of lengthening effects depends upon their localization, in this case, a distinction between lengthening of the onset consonant and the vocalic syllable rhyme. This functional division is considered in terms of speech-rate-sensitive predictive mechanisms and listeners' expectations regarding the occurrence of syllable perceptual centres.
Full text loading...
Most read this month