Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/3/10.1121/1.4929619
1.
1.ISO/IEC, “Guide 98-3: Uncertainty of measurement—Part 3: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement” (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2008), pp. 1120.
2.
2. W. Rudin, Real and Complex Analysis ( McGraw-Hill, New York, 1987).
3.
3. T. Berge and A. Ustad, “ Noise emission from road vehicles in Norway—measurements and database,” SINTEF Report STF40 A03031 (in Norwegian), 2003.
4.
4. G. Taraldsen, “ The complex image method,” Wave Motion 43(1), 9197 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wavemoti.2005.07.001
5.
5. G. Taraldsen and H. Jonasson, “ Aspects of ground effect modeling,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129(1), 4753 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3500694
6.
6.NT ACOU 116, “ Road vehicles: Determination of noise emission, Nordtest method,” Technical report, Nordic Innovation Centre (2004), pp. 118.
7.
7. F. Jacobsen, “ Random errors in sound power determination based on intensity measurement,” J. Sound Vib. 131(3), 475487 (1989).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(89)91007-9
8.
8. T. V. Tronstad and F. B. Gelderblom, personal communication.
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/3/10.1121/1.4929619
Loading
/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/3/10.1121/1.4929619
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/3/10.1121/1.4929619
2015-09-14
2016-09-28

Abstract

The mean sound exposure level from a source is routinely estimated by the mean of the observed sound exposures from repeated measurements. A formula for the standard uncertainty based on the Guide to the expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) is derived. An alternative formula is derived for the case where the GUM method fails. The formulas are applied on several examples, and compared with a Monte Carlo calculation of the standard uncertainty. The recommended formula can be seen simply as a convenient translation of the uncertainty on an energy scale into the decibel level scale, but with a theoretical foundation.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/asa/journal/jasa/138/3/1.4929619.html;jsessionid=9PklsRZLgpcBlRD2L5-CLchb.x-aip-live-06?itemId=/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/3/10.1121/1.4929619&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/asa/journal/jasa
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=asadl.org/jasa/138/3/10.1121/1.4929619&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/3/10.1121/1.4929619'
Right1,Right2,Right3,