Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/3/10.1121/1.4929622
1.
1. Anderson Hsieh, J. , and Koehler, K. (1988). “ The effect of foreign accent and speaking rate on native speaker comprehension,” Lang. Learn. 38, 561613.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1988.tb00167.x
2.
2. Baese-Berk, M. M. , Bradlow, A. R. , and Wright, B. A. (2013). “ Accent-independent adaptation to foreign accented speech,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133, EL174EL180.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4789864
3.
3. Baese-Berk, M. M. , Heffner, C. C. , Dilley, L. C. , Pitt, M. A. , Morrill, T. H. , and McAuley, J. D. (2014). “ Long-term temporal tracking of speech rate affects spoken-word recognition,” Psychol. Sci. 25, 15461553.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533705
4.
4. Baker, R. E. , Baese-Berk, M. , Bonnasse-Gahot, L. , Kim, M. , Van Engen, K. J. , and Bradlow, A. R. (2011). “ Word durations in non-native English,” J. Phon. 39, 117.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.10.006
5.
5. Barcroft, J. , and Sommers, M. S. (2005). “ Effects of acoustic variability on second language vocabulary learning,” Stud. Second Lang. Acq. 27, 387414.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050175
6.
6. Boersma, P. , and Weenink, D. (2015). “ Praat: Doing phonetics by computer,” [Computer program]. Version 5.3.56, retrieved from http://www.praat.org (Last viewed January 6, 2015).
7.
7. Bradlow, A. R. , Ackerman, L. , Burchfield, L. A. , and Hesterberg, L. (2010). “ ALLSSTAR: Archive of L1 and L2 Scripted and Spontaneous Transcripts And Recordings,” in Proceedings of the International Congress on Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong, pp. 356359.
8.
8. Bradlow, A. R. , and Bent, T. (2008). “ Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech,” Cognition 106, 707729.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.005
9.
9. Davidson, L. (2006). “ Phonology, phonetics, or frequency: Influences on the production of non-native sequences,” J. Phonetics 34, 104137.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.03.004
10.
10. De Jong, N. H. , and Wempe, T. (2008). “ Praat script syllable nuclei,” retrieved from http://sites.google.com/site/speechrate (Last viewed October 2, 2014).
11.
11. Dilley, L. C. , and Pitt, M. A. (2010). “ Altering context speech rate can cause words to appear or disappear,” Psychol. Sci. 21, 16641670.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797610384743
12.
12. Flege, J. E. (1995). “ Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems,” in Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues, edited by W. Strange ( York Press, Timonium, MD), pp. 233277.
13.
13. Grabe, E. , and Low, E. L. (2002). “ Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis,” in Laboratory Phonology 7, edited by C. Gussenhoven and N. Warner ( Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany), pp. 515546.
14.
14. Guion, S. , Flege, J. E. , Liu, H.-M. , and Yeni-Komshian, G. (2000). “ Age of learning effects on the duration of sentences produced in a second language,” Appl. Psycholinguistics 21, 205228.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400002034
15.
15. Hansen, J. G. (2004). “ Developmental sequences in the acquisition of English L2 syllable codas: A preliminary study,” Stud. Second Lang. Acq. 26, 85124.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104261046
16.
16. Kalikow, D. N. , Stevens, K. N. , and Elliott, L. L. (1977). “ Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 61, 13371351.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.381436
17.
17. Lennon, P. (1990). “ Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach,” Lang. Learn. 40, 387417.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00669.x
18.
18. Munro, M. J. , and Derwing, T. M. (1998). “ Accent, intelligibility and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s,” Stud. Second Lang. Acq. 20, 116.
20.
20. Sheldon, A. , and Strange, W. (1982). “ The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English: Evidence that speech production can precede speech perception,” Appl. Psycholinguistic 3, 243261.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400001417
21.
21. Sommers, M. S. , and Barcroft, J. (2007). “ An integrated account of the effects of acoustic variability in first language and second language: Evidence from amplitude, fundamental frequency, and speaking rate variability,” Appl. Psycholinguistic 28, 231249.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0142716407070129
22.
22. Sommers, M. S. , Nygaard, L. C. , and Pisoni, D. B. (1994). “ Stimulus variability and spoken word recognition I Effects of variability in speaking rate and overall amplitude,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96, 13141324.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.411453
23.
23. Trofimovich, P. , and Baker, W. (2006). “ Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech,” Stud. Second Lang. Acq. 28, 130.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060013
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/3/10.1121/1.4929622
Loading
/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/3/10.1121/1.4929622
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/3/10.1121/1.4929622
2015-09-04
2016-12-09

Abstract

Non-native speech differs from native speech in multiple ways. Previous research has described segmental and suprasegmental differences between native and non-native speech in terms of group averages. For example, average speaking rate for non-natives is slower than for natives. However, it is unknown whether non-native speech is also more variable than native speech. This study introduces a method of comparing rate change across utterances, demonstrating that non-native speaking rate is more variable than native speech. These results suggest that future work examining non-native speech perception and production should investigate both mean differences and variability in the signal.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/asa/journal/jasa/138/3/1.4929622.html;jsessionid=b0uNTjHfmoI1kJOHs4jfj-AS.x-aip-live-06?itemId=/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/3/10.1121/1.4929622&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/asa/journal/jasa
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=asadl.org/jasa/138/3/10.1121/1.4929622&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/3/10.1121/1.4929622'
Right1,Right2,Right3,