Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/3/10.1121/1.4929624
1.
1. Bacon, S. P. , and Gleitman, R. M. (1992). “ Modulation detection in subjects with relatively flat hearing losses,” J. Speech Hear Res 35(3), 642653.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3503.642
2.
2. Dai, H. , and Green, D. M. (1991). “ Effect of amplitude modulation on profile detection,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90, 836845.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.401951
3.
3. Dau, T. , Piechowiak, T. , and Ewert, S. D. (2013). “ Modeling within- and across-channel processes in comodulation masking release,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133(1), 350364.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4768882
4.
4. Ernst, S. M. , Rennies, J. , Kollmeier, B. , and Verhey, J. L. (2010). “ Suppression and comodulation masking release in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128(1), 300309.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3397582
5.
5. Fitzgibbons, P. J. , and Wightman, F. L. (1982). “ Gap detection in normal and hearing-impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72, 761765.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.388256
6.
6. Füllgrabe, C. , Meyer, B. , and Lorenzi, C. (2003). “ Effect of cochlear damage on the detection of complex temporal envelopes,” Hear Res 178(1), 3543.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5955(03)00027-3
7.
7. Green, D. M. (1988). Profile Analysis: Auditory Intensity Discrimination ( Oxford University Press, New York).
8.
8. Green, D. M. , and Nguyen, Q. T. (1988). “ Profile analysis: Detecting dynamic spectral changes,” Hear. Res. 32, 147164.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(88)90087-1
9.
9. Grose, J. H. , and Hall, J. W. (1994). “ Modulation detection interference (MDI) in listeners with cochlear hearing loss,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 37(3), 680686.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3703.680
10.
10. Hall, J. W. III, and Grose, J. H. (1994). “ Signal detection in complex comodulated backgrounds by normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 435443.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.408337
11.
11. Hall, J. W. , Grose, J. H. , Buss, E. , and Hatch, D. R. (1998). “ Temporal analysis and stimulus fluctuation in listeners with normal and impaired hearing,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 41(2), 340354.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4102.340
12.
12. Hall, J. W. III, Grose, J. H. , and Haggard M. P. (1990). “ Effects of flanking band proximity, number, and modulation pattern on comodulation masking release,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 269283.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.399294
13.
13. Kale, S. , and Heinz, M. G. (2010). “ Envelope coding in auditory nerve fibers following noise-induced hearing loss,” J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 11(4), 657673.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-010-0223-6
14.
14. Lentz, J. J. (2006). “ Spectral-peak selection in spectral-shape discrimination by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 945956.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2216564
15.
15. Lentz, J. J. , and Leek, M. R. (2003). “ Spectral shape discrimination by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 16041616.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1553461
16.
16. Levitt, H. (1971). “ Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49, 467477.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1912375
17.
17. McFadden, D. (1986). “ Comodulation masking release: Effects of varying the level, duration, and time delay of the cue band,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 80(6), 16581667.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.394277
18.
19. Moore, B. C. , Shailer, M. J. , Hall, J. W. III, and Schooneveldt, G. P. (1993). “ Comodulation masking release in subjects with unilateral and bilateral hearing impairment,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93(1), 435451.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.405624
19.
18. Moore, B. C. , Shailer, M. J. , and Schooneveldt, G. P. (1992). “ Temporal modulation transfer functions for band-limited noise in subjects with cochlear hearing loss,” Br. J. Audiol. 26(4), 229237.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03005369209076641
20.
20. Reed, C. M. , Braida, L. D. , and Zurek, P. M. (2009). “ Review of the literature on temporal resolution in listeners with cochlear hearing impairment: A critical assessment of the role of suprathreshold deficits,” Trends Amplif. 13(1), 443.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1084713808325412
21.
21. Shen, Y. , and Lentz, J. J. (2010). “ Effect of fast-acting compression on modulation detection interference for normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127(6), 36543665.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3418684
22.
22. Strickland, E. A. , Viemeister, N. F. , Fantini, D. A. , and Garrison, M. A. (1989). “ Within- versus cross-channel mechanisms in detection of envelope phase disparity,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86, 21602166.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.398476
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/3/10.1121/1.4929624
Loading
/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/3/10.1121/1.4929624
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/3/10.1121/1.4929624
2015-09-03
2016-12-10

Abstract

Two experiments tested the influence of hearing impairment (HI) on representing across-frequency temporal coherence. In one experiment, HI listeners demonstrated similar abilities to normal-hearing listeners in detecting across-frequency differences in modulation phase. In another, spectral-shape discrimination was detrimentally affected by modulation phase disparities imposed on spectral components. Spectral-shape discrimination by HI listeners was less influenced by the disparities, suggesting that hearing loss alters the representation of envelope phase. Results suggest that multiple approaches may be necessary to determine alterations associated with hearing loss—detection tasks may not be sufficient to elucidate distortions to temporal envelope associated with hearing loss.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/asa/journal/jasa/138/3/1.4929624.html;jsessionid=0HndAbjv2SnmksKS086BwUJL.x-aip-live-02?itemId=/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/3/10.1121/1.4929624&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/asa/journal/jasa
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=asadl.org/jasa/138/3/10.1121/1.4929624&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/3/10.1121/1.4929624'
Right1,Right2,Right3,