Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
1. Crew, J. D. , Galvin, J. J. 3rd, Landsberger, D. M. , and Fu, Q.-J. (2015). “ Contributions of electric and acoustic hearing to bimodal speech and music perception,” PLoS One. 10, e0120279.
2. Dorman, M. F. , Gifford, R. H. , Spahr, A. J. , and McKarns, S. A. (2008). “ The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies,” Audiol. Neurotol. 13, 105112.
3. Fuller, C. D. , Galvin, J. J. 3rd, Free, R. H. , and Baskent, D. (2014). “ Musician effect in cochlear implant simulated gender categorization,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 135, EL159EL165.
4. Galvin, J. J. 3rd, Fu, Q.-J. , and Nogaki, G. (2007). “ Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners,” Ear Hear. 28, 302319.
5. Galvin, J. J. 3rd, Fu, Q.-J. , and Oba, S. (2008). “ Effect of instrument timbre on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 124, EL189EL195.
6. Kong, Y.-Y. , Stickney, G. S. , and Zeng, F.-G. (2005). “ Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 13511361.
7. Kraus, N. , Skoe, E. , Parbery-Clark, A. , and Ashley, R. (2009). “ Experience-induced malleability in neural encoding of pitch, timbre and timing: Implications for language and music,” Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1169, 543557.
8. Parbery-Clark, A. , Skoe, E. , Lam, C. , and Kraus, N. (2009). “ Musician enhancement for speech in noise,” Ear Hear. 30, 653661.
9. Peretz, I. , Champod, A. S. , and Hyde, K. (2003). “ Varieties of musical disorders: The Montreal battery of evaluation of amusia,” Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 999, 5875.
10. Rader, T. , Adel, Y. , Fastl, H. , and Baumann, U. (2015). “ Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation: A simulation and model comparison,” Ear Hear., in press (2015).
11. Ruggles, D. R. , Freyman, R. L. , and Oxenham, A. J. (2014). “ Influence of musical training on understanding voiced and whispered speech in noise,” PLoS One. 9, e86980.

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



For bimodal cochlear implant users, acoustic and electric hearing has been shown to contribute differently to speech and music perception. However, differences in test paradigms and stimuli in speech and music testing can make it difficult to assess the relative contributions of each device. To address these concerns, the Sung Speech Corpus (SSC) was created. The SSC contains 50 monosyllable words sung over an octave range and can be used to test both speech and music perception using the same stimuli. Here SSC data are presented with normal hearing listeners and any advantage of musicianship is examined.


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd