Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/4/10.1121/1.4933062
1.
1. A. Spriet, S. Doclo, M. Moonen, and J. Wouters, “ Feedback control in hearing aids,” in Springer Handbook of Speech Processing ( Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008), pp. 9791000.
2.
2. J. W. Strutt (Lord Rayleigh), “ Some general theorems relating to vibrations,” Proc. London Math. Soc. s1-4(1), 357368 (1873).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1112/plms/s1-4.1.357
3.
3. S. Ballantine, “ Reciprocity in electromagnetic, mechanical, acoustical, and interconnected systems,” Proc. Inst. Radio Eng. 17(6), 927951 (1929).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1929.221771
4.
4. M. Hiipakka, M. Tikander, and M. Karjalainen, “ Modeling the external ear acoustics for insert headphone usage,” J. Audio Eng. Soc. 58(4), 269281 (2010).
5.
5. J. Hellgren, T. Lunner, and S. Arlinger, “ Variations in the feedback of hearing aids,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106(5), 28212833 (1999).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.428107
6.
6. J. M. Kates, “ Room reverberation effects in hearing aid feedback cancellation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109(1), 367378 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1332379
7.
7. M. R. Stinson and G. A. Daigle, “ Transverse pressure distributions in a simple model ear canal occluded by a hearing aid test fixture,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121(6), 36893702 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2722214
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/4/10.1121/1.4933062
Loading
/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/4/10.1121/1.4933062
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/4/10.1121/1.4933062
2015-10-15
2016-12-06

Abstract

A reciprocal measurement procedure to measure the acoustic feedback path in hearing aids is investigated. The advantage of the reciprocal measurement compared to the direct measurement is a significantly reduced sound pressure in the ear. The direct and reciprocal measurements are compared using measurements on a dummy head with adjustable ear canals, different earmolds, and variations in the outer sound field. The results show that the reciprocal measurement procedure can be used to obtain plausible feedback paths, while reducing the sound pressure in the ear canal by 30 to 40 dB.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/asa/journal/jasa/138/4/1.4933062.html;jsessionid=zM_cFIiDUjqboHFGaF3j_1Q-.x-aip-live-02?itemId=/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/4/10.1121/1.4933062&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/asa/journal/jasa
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=asadl.org/jasa/138/4/10.1121/1.4933062&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/4/10.1121/1.4933062'
Right1,Right2,Right3,