Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/4/10.1121/1.4934178
1.
1. Clopper, C. G. , Pisoni, D. , and de Jong, K. (2005). “ Acoustic characteristics of the vowel systems of six regional varieties of American English,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 16611676.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2000774
2.
2. Connell, B. (2002). “ Tone languages and the universality of intrinsic F0: Evidence from Africa,” J. Phonetics 30, 101129.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0156
3.
3. Deutsch, D. , Jinghong, L. , Sheng, J. , and Henthorn, T. (2009). “ The pitch levels of female speech in two Chinese villages,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, EL208EL213.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3113892
4.
4. Fox, R. A. , and Jacewicz, E. (2009). “ Cross-dialectal variation in formant dynamics of American English vowels,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 26032618.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3212921
5.
5. Hillenbrand, J. M. , Clark, M. J. , and Nearey, T. M. (2001). “ Effects of consonantal environment on vowel formant patterns,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 748763.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1337959
6.
6. Hillenbrand, J. M. , Getty, L. A. , Clark, M. J. , and Wheeler, K. (1995). “ Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 30993111.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.411872
7.
7. Honda, K. , Hirai, H. , Masaki, S. , and Shamada, Y. (1999). “ Role of vertical larynx movement and cervical lordosis in F0 control,” Lang. Speech 42, 401411.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00238309990420040301
8.
8. Jacewicz, E. , Fox, R. A. , and Salmons, J. (2011). “ Cross-generational vowel change in American English,” Lang. Var. Change 23, 4586.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954394510000219
9.
9. Jacewicz, E. , Fox, R. A. , and Wei, L. (2010). “ Between-speaker and within-speaker variation in speech tempo of American English,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128, 839850.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3459842
10.
10. Kingston, J. (2007). “ Segmental influences on F0: Automatic or controlled?,” in Tones and Tunes, Vol. 2, edited by C. Gussenhoven and T. Riad ( Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany), pp. 171210.
11.
11. Kingston, J. , and Diehl, R. (1994). “ Phonetic knowledge,” Language 70, 419454.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lan.1994.0023
12.
12. Ladd, D. R. , and Silverman, K. E. A. (1984). “ Vowel intrinsic pitch in connected speech,” Phonetica 41, 3140.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000261708
13.
13. Milenkovic, P. (2003). TF32 software program (University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI).
14.
14. Ohala, J. L. , and Eukel, B. W. (1987). “ Explaining the intrinsic pitch of vowels,” in In Honor of Ilse Lehiste, edited by R. Channon and L. Shockey ( Foris Publications, Dordrecht), pp. 207215.
15.
15.Scicon R&D, Inc. (2005). PitchWorks. http://www.sciconrd.com (Last viewed September 24, 2015).
16.
16. Slis, I. H. (1966). “ A model for the distinction between voiceless and voiced consonants,” Annual Progress Report 1, Institute for Perception Research, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, pp. 4044.
17.
17. Van Hoof, S. , and Verhoeven, J. (2011). “ Intrinsic vowel F0, the size of vowel inventories and second language acquisition,” J. Phonetics 39, 168177.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.02.007
18.
18. Whalen, D. H. , Gick, B. , Kumada, M. , and Honda, K. (1998). “ Cricothyroid activity in high and low vowels: Exploring the automaticity of intrinsic F0,” J. Phonetics 27, 125142.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1999.0091
19.
19. Whalen, D. H. , and Levitt, A. G. (1995). “ The universality of intrinsic F0 of vowels,” J. Phonetics 23, 349366.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(95)80165-0
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/4/10.1121/1.4934178
Loading
/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/4/10.1121/1.4934178
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/4/10.1121/1.4934178
2015-10-19
2016-09-30

Abstract

There has been a long-standing debate whether the intrinsic fundamental frequency (IF0) of vowels is an automatic consequence of articulation or whether it is independently controlled by speakers to perceptually enhance vowel contrasts along the height dimension. This paper provides evidence from regional variation in American English that IF0 difference between high and low vowels is, in part, controlled and varies across dialects. The sources of this 0 control are socio-cultural and cannot be attributed to differences in the vowel inventory size. The socially motivated enhancement was found only in prosodically prominent contexts.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/asa/journal/jasa/138/4/1.4934178.html;jsessionid=EZoNpki_6FH8Kt_g-TWe_yoi.x-aip-live-06?itemId=/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/4/10.1121/1.4934178&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/asa/journal/jasa
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=asadl.org/jasa/138/4/10.1121/1.4934178&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/4/10.1121/1.4934178'
Right1,Right2,Right3,