Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
1. E. J. Hunter and I. R. Titze, “ Variations in intensity, fundamental frequency, and voicing for teachers in occupational versus non-occupational settings,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 53(4), 862875 (2010).
2. P. Bottalico and A. Astolfi, “ Investigations into vocal doses and parameters pertaining to primary school teachers in classrooms,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 28172827 (2012).
3. E. J. Hunter and I. R. Titze, “ Quantifying vocal fatigue recovery: Dynamic vocal recovery trajectories after a vocal loading exercise,” Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 118(6), 449460 (2009).
4. I. R. Titze, Principles of Voice Production ( National Center for Voice and Speech, Salt Lake City, 2000), pp. 1409.
5. P. Pelegrín-García and J. Brunskog, “ Speakers' comfort and voice level variation in classrooms: Laboratory research,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132, 249260 (2012).
6.ISO 9921:2002(E), Ergonomics—Assessment of Speech Communication ( International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2002).
7. H. Traunmüller and A. Eriksson, “ Acoustic effects of variation in vocal effort by men, women and children,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 34383451 (2000).
8. E. J. Hunter, A. E. Halpern, and J. L. Spielman, “ Impact of four nonclinical speaking environments on the child's fundamental frequency and voice level: A preliminary case study,” Lang. Speech Hear. Serv. Schools 43, 252263 (2012).
9. B. Shield and J. E. Dockrell, “ External and internal noise surveys of London primary schools,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115(2), 730738 (2004).
10.ISO 3382-2:2008(E), Acoustics—Measurement of Room Acoustic Parameters, Part 2: Reverberation Time in Ordinary Rooms ( International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2008).
11. M. A. Humphreys and J. F. Nicol, “ Understanding the adaptive approach to thermal comfort,” ASHRAE Tech. Data Bull. 14(1), 114 (1998).
12. K. D. Kryter, “ Effects of ear protective devices on the intelligibility of speech in noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 18, 413417 (1946).

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



Speakers adjust their vocal effort when communicating in different room acoustic and noise conditions and when instructed to speak at different volumes. The present paper reports on the effects of voice style, noise level, and acoustic feedback on vocal effort, evaluated as sound pressure level, and self-reported vocal fatigue, comfort, and control. Speakers increased their level in the presence of babble and when instructed to talk in a loud style, and lowered it when acoustic feedback was increased and when talking in a soft style. Self-reported responses indicated a preference for the normal style without babble noise.


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd