Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/6/10.1121/1.4937168
1.
1.Articulate Instruments Ltd. (2010). “Articulate Assistant user guide (version 1.18)” (Articulate Instruments Ltd., Edinburgh, UK).
2.
2. Davidson, L. (2006). “ Comparing tongue shapes from ultrasound imaging using smoothing spline analysis of variance,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120(1), 407415.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2205133
3.
3. Derrick, D. , Best, C. T. , and Fiasson, R. (2015). “ Non-metallic ultrasound probe holder for co-collection and co-registration with EMA,” in Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (The University of Glasgow Glasgow, UK), Paper No. 0119.1-5.
4.
4. Gu, C. (2002). Smoothing Spline ANOVA Models ( Springer, New York).
5.
5. Gu, J. , Bressmann, T. , Cannons, K. , and Wong, W. (2004). The Ultrasonographic Contour Analyzer for Tongue Surfaces (Ultra-CATS) ( University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada).
6.
6. Lawson, E. , Scobbie, J. M. , and Stuart-Smith, J. (2013). “ Bunched /r/ promotes vowel merger to schwar: An ultrasound tongue imaging study of Scottish sociophonetic variation,” J. Phonetics 41, 198210.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2013.01.004
7.
7. Mielke, J. (2015). “ An ultrasound study of Canadian French rhotic vowels with polar smoothing spline comparisons,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 137(5), 28582869.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4919346
8.
8. Mielke, J. , Baker, A. , Archangeli, D. , and Racy, S. (2005). “ Palatron: A technique for aligning ultrasound images of the tongue and palate,” Coyote Papers: Working Papers in Linguistics, Linguistic Theory (University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ), Vol. 14, pp. 97108.
9.
9. Miller, A. L. , and Finch, K. B. (2011). “ Corrected high-frame rate anchored ultrasound with software alignment,” J. Speech Language Hearing Res. 54(2), 471486.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0103)
10.
10. Stone, M. (2005). “ A guide to analysing tongue motion from ultrasound images,” Clin. Linguistics Phonetics 19(6-7), 455501.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699200500113558
11.
11. Wang, Y. (2011). Smoothing Splines: Methods and Applications ( Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton, FL).
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/6/10.1121/1.4937168
Loading
/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/6/10.1121/1.4937168
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/6/10.1121/1.4937168
2015-12-11
2016-12-03

Abstract

Tongue surface measurements from midsagittal ultrasound scans are effectively arcs with deviations representing tongue shape, but smoothing-spline analysis of variances (SSANOVAs) assume variance around a horizontal line. Therefore, calculating SSANOVA average curves of tongue traces in Cartesian Coordinates [Davidson, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (1), 407–415 (2006)] creates errors that are compounded at tongue tip and root where average tongue shape deviates most from a horizontal line. This paper introduces a method for transforming data into polar coordinates similar to the technique by Mielke [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (5), 2858–2869 (2015)], but using the virtual origin of a radial ultrasound transducer as the polar origin—allowing data conversion in a manner that is robust against between-subject and between-session variability.

Loading

Full text loading...