Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
1. P. Laugier and G. Haiat, Bone Quantitative Ultrasound ( Springer, New York, 2011).
2. A. Hosokawa and T. Otani, “ Ultrasonic wave propagation in bovine cancellous bone,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 558562 (1997).
3. A. Hosokawa and T. Otani, “ Acoustic anisotropy in bovine cancellous bone,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 27182722 (1998).
4. A. Clarke, J. Evans, J. Truscott, R. Milner, and M. Smith, “ A phantom for quantitative ultrasound of trabecular bone,” Phys. Med. Biol. 39, 16771687 (1994).
5. K. A. Wear, “ The dependencies of phase velocity and dispersion on trabecular thickness and spacing in trabecular bone mimicking phantoms,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 11861192 (2005).
6. K. A. Wear, “ Mechanisms for attenuation in cancellous-bone mimicking phantoms,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelectr., Freq. Control 55, 24182425 (2008).
7. K. A. Wear, “ The dependencies of phase velocity and dispersion on volume fraction in cancellous-bone-mimicking phantoms,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 11971201 (2009).
8. R. Hodgskinson, C. F. Njeh, M. A. Whitehead, and C. M. Langton, “ The non-linear relationship between BUA and porosity in cancellous bone,” Phys. Med. Biol. 41, 24112420 (1996).
9. C. M. Langton, M. A. Whitehead, D. K. Langton, and G. Langley, “ Development of a cancellous bone structural model by stereolithography for ultrasound characterization of the calcaneus,” Med. Eng. Phys. 19, 599604 (1997).
10. G. Sisias, R. Phillips, C. Dobson, M. Fagan, P. Ganney, and C. M. Langton, “ Tessellation and contour extraction algorithms for rapid prototyping replication of 3D-CT reconstructions of cancellous bone,” in Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Visualisation (2001), pp. 449455.
11. K. Engelke, C. Süß, and W. A. Kalender, “ Stereolithographic models simulating trabecular bone and their characterization by thin-slice- and micro-CT,” Euro. Radiol. 11, 20262040 (2001).
12. K. Attenborough, H.-C. Shin, Q. Qin, M. J. Fagan, and C. M. Langton, “ Measurements of tortuosity in stereolithographical bone replicas using audiofrequency pulses,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 27792782 (2005).
13. K. A. Wear, “ Estimation of fast and slow wave properties in cancellous bone using Prony's method and curve fitting,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133(4), 24902501 (2013).
14. J. J. Hoffman, A. M. Nelson, M. R. Holland, and J. G. Miller, “ Cancellous bone fast and slow waves obtained with Bayesian probability theory correlate with porosity from computed tomography,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132(3), 18301837 (2012).
15. K. A. Wear, “ Time-domain separation of interfering waves in cancellous bone using bandlimited deconvolution: Simulation and phantom study,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 135, 21022112 (2014).
16. D. Paganin, S. Mayo, T. Gureyev, P. Miller, and S. Willkins, “ Simultaneous phase and amplitude extraction from a single defocused image of a homogeneous object,” J. Microscopy 206, 3340 (2002).
17. A. Mirone, E. Brun, E. Gouillart, P. Tafforeau, and J. Kieffer, “ The PyHST2 hybrid distributed code for high speed tomographic reconstruction with iterative reconstruction and a priori knowledge capabilities,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 324, 4148 (2014).
18.3D printer manufacturer website: (Last viewed 01/04/2016).
19. F. Meziere, M. Muller, B. Dobigny, E. Bossy, and A. Derode, “ Simulations of ultrasound propagation in random arrangements of elliptic scatterers: Occurrence of two longitudinal waves,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133, 643652 (2013).
20. R. N. McCarthy, L. B. Jeffcott, and R. N. McCartney, “ Ultrasound speed in equine cortical bone: Effects of orientation, density, porosity and temperature,” J. Biomech. 23(11), 11391143 (1990).
21. K. R. Marutyan, M. R. Holland, and J. G. Miller, “ Anomalous negative dispersion in bone can result from the interference of fast and slow waves,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, EL55EL61 (2006).
22. K. R. Marutyan, G. L. Bretthorst, and J. G. Miller, “ Bayesian estimation of the underlying bone properties from mixed fast and slow mode ultrasonic signals,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, EL8EL15 (2007).
23. F. Meziere, M. Muller, E. Bossy, and A. Derode, “ Measurements of ultrasound velocity and attenuation in numerical anisotropic porous media compared to Biot's and multiple scattering models,” Ultrasonics 54, 11461154 (2014).

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



In this paper, ultrasound measurements of 1:1 scale three-dimensional(3D) printed trabecular bone phantoms are reported. The micro-structure of a trabecular horse bone sample was obtained via synchrotron x-ray microtomography, converted to a 3D binary data set, and successfully 3D-printed at scale 1:1. Ultrasound through-transmission experiments were also performed through a highly anisotropic version of this structure, obtained by elongating the digitized structure prior to 3D printing. As in real anisotropic trabecular bone, both the fast and slow waves were observed. This illustrates the potential of stereolithography and the relevance of such bone phantoms for the study of ultrasound propagation in bone.


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd