Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/asa/journal/jasa/139/3/10.1121/1.4943783
1.
1. Boulet, J. , White, M. , and Bruce, I. C. (2016). “ Temporal considerations for stimulating spiral ganglion neurons with cochlear implants,” J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 17, 117.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-015-0545-5
2.
2. Brown, C. J. , Abbas, P. J. , Borland, J. , and Bertschy, M. R. (1996). “ Electrically evoked whole nerve action potentials in Ineraid cochlear implant users: Responses to different stimulating electrode configurations and comparison to psychophysical responses,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 39, 453467.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3903.453
3.
3. Chatterjee, M. (1999). “ Temporal mechanisms underlying recovery from forward masking in multielectrode-implant listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 18531863.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.426722
4.
4. Hughes, M. L. , Castioni, E. E. , Goehring, J. L. , and Baudhuin, J. L. (2012). “ Temporal response properties of the auditory nerve: Data from human cochlear-implant recipients,” Hear. Res. 285, 4657.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2012.01.010
5.
5. Kang, S. Y. , Colesa, D. J. , Swiderski, D. L. , Su, G. L. , Raphael, Y. , and Pfingst, B. E. (2010). “ Effects of hearing preservation on psychophysical responses to cochlear implant stimulation,” J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 11, 245265.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-009-0194-7
6.
6. Killian, M. J. P. , Klis, S. F. L. , and Smoorenburg, G. F. (1994). “ Adaptation in the compound action potential response of the guinea pig VIIIth nerve to electrical stimulation,” Hear. Res. 81, 6682.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(94)90154-6
7.
7. McKay, C. M. (2012). “ Forward masking as a method of measuring place specificity of neural excitation in cochlear implants: A review of methods and interpretation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 22092224.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3683248
8.
8. Miller, C. A. , Robinson, B. K. , Woo, J. , and Hu, N. (2010). “ Physiological and anatomical changes in the auditory nerve fibers of chronically deaf cats,” ARO 33, 910.
9.
9. Nelson, D. A. , and Donaldson, G. S. (2001). “ Psychophysical recovery from single-pulse forward masking in electric hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 29212933.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1371762
10.
10. Nelson, D. A. , and Donaldson, G. S. (2002). “ Psychophysical recovery from pulse-train forward masking in electric hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 29322947.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1514935
11.
11. Oxenham, A. J. , and Moore, B. C. (1994). “ Modeling the additivity of nonsimultaneous masking,” Hear. Res. 80, 105118.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(94)90014-0
12.
12. Pfingst, B. E. , Colesa, D. J. , Hembrador, S. , Kang, S. Y. , Middlebrooks, J. C. , Raphael, Y. , and Su, G. L. (2011). “ Detection of pulse trains in the electrically stimulated cochlea: Effects of cochlear health,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130, 39543968.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3651820
13.
13. Ramekers, D. , Versnel, H. , Strahl, S. B. , Klis, S. F. , and Grolman, W. (2015). “ Recovery characteristics of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve in deafened guinea pigs: Relation to neuronal status,” Hear. Res. 321, 1224.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2015.01.001
14.
14. Shannon, R. V. (1990). “ Forward masking in patients with cochlear implants,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 741744.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.399777
15.
15. Smith, R. L. , and Brachman, M. L. (1982). “ Adaptation in auditory-nerve fibers: A revised model,” Biol. Cybern. 44, 107120.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00317970
16.
16. Stypulkowski, P. H. , and van den Honert, C. (1984). “ Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. I. Compound action potential recordings,” Hear. Res. 14, 205223.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(84)90051-0
17.
17. Westerman, L. A. , and Smith, R. L. (1984). “ Rapid and short-term adaptation in auditory nerve responses,” Hear. Res. 15, 249260.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(84)90032-7
18.
18. Wilson, B. S. , Finley, C. C. , Lawson, D. T. , and Zerbi, M. (1997). “ Temporal representations with cochlear implants,” Am. J. Otol. 18, S3034.
19.
19. Zhou, N. , Kraft, C. T. , Colesa, D. J. , and Pfingst, B. E. (2015). “ Integration of pulse trains in humans and guinea pigs with cochlear implants,” J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 16, 523534.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-015-0521-0
20.
20. Zhou, N. , and Pfingst, B. E. (2014). “ Relationship between multipulse integration and speech recognition with cochlear implants,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 136, 12571268.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4890640
21.
21. Zhou, R. , Abbas, P. J. , and Assouline, J. G. (1995). “ Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in peripherally myelin-deficient mice,” Hear. Res. 88, 98106.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(95)00105-D
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/139/3/10.1121/1.4943783
Loading
/content/asa/journal/jasa/139/3/10.1121/1.4943783
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/139/3/10.1121/1.4943783
2016-03-15
2016-12-09

Abstract

The present study evaluated the slopes of threshold-versus-pulse-rate functions (multipulse integration, MPI) in humans with cochlear implants in relation to recovery from 300-ms forward maskers. MPI has been correlated with spiral ganglion cell density in animals. The present study showed that steeper MPI functions were correlated with faster recovery from forward masking. The findings suggested that the variations in the MPI slopes are explained not only by the quantity of neurons contributing to the integration process but also by the neurons' temporal response characteristics and possibly central inhibition.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/asa/journal/jasa/139/3/1.4943783.html;jsessionid=JQCJRnRHm5JKL_-eYAaiDlhq.x-aip-live-03?itemId=/content/asa/journal/jasa/139/3/10.1121/1.4943783&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/asa/journal/jasa
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=asadl.org/jasa/139/3/10.1121/1.4943783&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/jasa/139/3/10.1121/1.4943783'
Right1,Right2,Right3,