Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
1. P. N. Juslin and J. Sloboda, Handbook of Music and Emotion: Theory, Research, Applications, Series in Affective Science ( Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2011).
2. L. Dubé and J. Le Bel, “ The content and structure of laypeople's concept of pleasure,” Cognit. Emotion 17(2), 263295 (2003).
3. P. J. Rentfrow and S. D. Gosling, “ The do re mi's of everyday life: The structure and personality correlates of music preferences,” J. Person. Social Psychol. 84(6),12361256 (2003).
4. A. J. Blood and R. J. Zatorre, “ Intensely pleasurable responses to music correlate with activity in brain regions implicated in reward and emotion,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98(20), 1181811823 (2001).
5. A. Goldstein, “ Thrills in response to music and other stimuli,” Physiol. Psychol. 8(1), 126129 (1980).
6. V. N. Salimpoor, M. Benovoy, K. Larcher, A. Dagher, and R. J. Zatorre, “ Anatomically distinct dopamine release during anticipation and experience of peak emotion to music,” Nat. Neurosci. 14(2), 257264 (2011).
7. W. C. Sabine, Collected Papers on Acoustics ( Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1922).
8. M. Barron, “ The subjective effects of first reflections in concert halls—The need for lateral reflections,” J. Sound Vib. 15(4), 475494 (1971).
9. M. R. Schroeder, D. Gottlob, and K. F. Siebrasse, “ Comparative study of European concert halls: correlation of subjective preference with geometric and acoustic parameters,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 56(4), 11951201 (1974).
10. L. Beranek, Concert Halls and Opera Houses: Music, Acoustics, and Architecture ( Springer, New York, 2004).
11. C. Haan and F. R. Fricke, “ An evaluation of the importance of surface diffusivity in concert halls,” Appl. Acoust. 51(1), 5369 (1997).
12. L. L. Beranek, “ Subjective rank-orderings and acoustical measurements for fifty-eight concert halls,” Acta Acust. Acust. 89(3), 494508 (2003).
13. T. Lokki, “ Tasting music like wine,” Phys. Today 67(1), 2732 (2014).
14. A. Tajadura-Jiménez, P. Larsson, A. Väljamäe, D. Västfjäll, and M. Kleiner, “ When room size matters: Acoustic influences on emotional responses to sounds,” Emotion 10(3), 416–422 (2010).
15. D. Västfjäll, P. Larsson, and M. Kleiner, “ Emotion and auditory virtual environments: Affect-based judgments of music reproduced with virtual reverberation times,” CyberPsychol. Behav. 5(1), 1932 (2002).
16. V. N. Salimpoor, M. Benovoy, G. Longo, J. R. Cooperstock, and R. J. Zatorre, “ The rewarding aspects of music listening are related to degree of emotional arousal,” PloS One 4(10), e7487 (2009).
17. J. Paksepp and G. Bernatzky, “ Emotional sounds and the brain: The neuro-affective foundations of musical appreciation,” Behav. Process. 60, 133155 (2002).
18. J. A. Sloboda, “ Music structure and emotional response: Some empirical findings,” Psychol. Music 19, 110120 (1991).
19. C. L. Krumhansl, “ An exploratory study of musical emotions and psychophysiology,” Can. Exp. Psychol. 51(4), 336–353 (1997).
20. M. Barron, “ Subjective study of British symphony concert halls,” Acta Acust. Acust. 66(1), 114 (1988).
21. F. Winckel, “ Die besten Konzertsäle der Welt” (“The best concert halls in the world”), Baukunst Werkform 8, 751752 (1955).
22. T. Lokki, J. Pätynen, A. Kuusinen, and S. Tervo, “ Disentangling preference ratings of concert hall acoustics using subjective sensory profiles,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132(5), 31483161 (2012).
23. E. Kahle, “ Validation d'un modèle objectif de la perception de la qualité acoustique dans un ensemble de salles de concerts et d'opéeras” (“Validation of an objective model for the perceived acoustic quality of concert and opera halls”), Ph.D. thesis, IRCAM, Paris, France, 1995.
24. M. Long, “ What is so special about shoebox halls? Envelopment, envelopment, envelopment,” Acoust. Today 5(2), 2125 (2009).
25. J. Pätynen, S. Tervo, P. W. Robinson, and T. Lokki, “ Concert halls with strong lateral reflections enhance musical dynamics,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111(12), 44094414 (2014).
26. J. Pätynen, V. Pulkki, and T. Lokki, “ Anechoic recording system for symphony orchestra,” Acta Acust. Acust. 94(6), 856865 (2008).
27. J. Pätynen, “ A virtual symphony orchestra for studies on concert hall acoustics,” Ph.D. thesis, Aalto University School of Science, Aalto, Finland, 2011.
28. S. Tervo, J. Pätynen, A. Kuusinen, and T. Lokki, “ Spatial decomposition method for room impulse responses,” J. Audio Eng. Soc. 61(1/2), 1627 (2013).
29. J. Pätynen, S. Tervo, and T. Lokki, “ Amplitude panning decreases spectral brightness with concert hall auralizations,” in Proceedings of the 55th Audio Engineering Society Conference, Helsinki, Finland (August 27–29, 2014), Paper No. 49.
30.League of American Orchestras, Orchestra Repertoire Reports 2007–2011, 2011.
31. J. Pätynen, S. Tervo, and T. Lokki, “ Simulation of the violin section sound based on the analysis of orchestra performance,” in IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (WASPAA 2011), Piscataway, NJ (October 16–19, 2011), pp. 173176.
32. D. Huron, “ The ramp archetype and the maintenance of passive auditory attention,” Music Percept. 10(1), 8392 (1992).
33. W. Boucsein, D. C. Fowles, S. Grimnes, G. Ben-Shakhar, W. T. Roth, M. C. Dawson, and D. L. Filion, “ Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements,” Psychophysiology 49, 10171034 (2012).
34. M. Benedek and C. Kaernbach, “ A continuous measure of phasic electrodermal activity,” J. Neurosci. Methods 190, 8091 (2010).
35. T. Baumgartner, M. Esslen, and L. Jäncke, “ From emotion perception to emotion experience: Emotions evoked by pictures and classical music,” Int. J. Psychophysiol. 60(1), 3443 (2006).
36. J. J. Braithwaite, D. G. Watson, R. Jones, and M. Rowe, “ A guide for analysing electrodermal activity (EDA) and skin conductance responses (SCRs) for psychological experiments,” Technical Report, Selective Attention & Awareness Laboratory, Behavioural Brain Sciences Centre, University of Birmingham, UK.
37. S. Khalfa, I. Peretz, J.-P. Blondin, and R. Manon, “ Event-related skin conductance responses to musical emotions in humans,” Neurosci. Lett. 328(2), 145149 (2002).
38. R. A. Bradley and M. E. Terry, “ Rank analysis of incomplete block designs. I. The method of paired comparisons,” Biometrika 39, 324345 (1952).
39. R. D. Luce, Individual Choice Behaviour: A Theoretical Analysis ( Wiley, New York, 1959).
40. P. Courcoux and M. Semenou, “ Preference data analysis using a paired comparison model,” Food Quality Preference 8(5), 353358 (1997).
41. S. Choisel and F. Wickelmaier, “ Evaluation of multichannel reproduced sound: Scaling auditory attributes underlying listener preference,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121(1), 388400 (2007).
42. A. H. Marshall and M. Barron, “ Spatial responsiveness in concert halls and the origins of spatial impression,” Appl. Acoust. 62(2), 91108 (2001).
43. Y. Benjamini and Y. Hochberg, “ Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing,” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 57(1), 289300 (1995).
44. V. N. Salimpoor, I. van den Bosch, N. Kovacevic, A. R. McIntosh, A. Dagher, and R. J. Zatorre, “ Interactions between the nucleus accumbens and auditory cortices predict music reward value,” Science 340(6129), 216219 (2013).
45. M. Barron and L.-J. Lee, “ Energy relations in concert auditoriums. I,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84(2), 618628 (1988).
46. T. Hidaka, L. L. Beranek, and N. Nishihara, “ A comparison between shoebox and non-shoebox halls based on objective measurements in actual halls,” in Acoustics'08, Paris, France (June 29–July 4, 2008), pp. 565570.
47. J. S. Bradley and G. A. Soulodre, “ The influence of late arriving energy on spatial impression,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97(4), 22632271 (1995).

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



An audience's auditory experience during a thrilling and emotive live symphony concert is an intertwined combination of the music and the acoustic response of the concert hall. Music in itself is known to elicit emotional pleasure, and at best, listening to music may evoke concrete psychophysiological responses. Certain concert halls have gained a reputation for superior acoustics, but despite the continuous research by a multitude of objective and subjective studies on room acoustics, the fundamental reason for the appreciation of some concert halls remains elusive. This study demonstrates that room acousticeffects contribute to the overall emotional experience of a musical performance. In two listening tests, the subjects listen to identical orchestra performances rendered in the acoustics of several concert halls. The emotional excitation during listening is measured in the first experiment, and in the second test, the subjects assess the experienced subjective impact by paired comparisons. The results showed that the sound of some traditional rectangular halls provides greater psychophysiological responses and subjective impact. These findings provide a quintessential explanation for these halls' success and reveal the overall significance of room acoustics for emotional experience in music performance.


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd