Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/asa/journal/jasa/139/3/10.1121/1.4944563
1.
1. Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical Data Analysis ( John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), pp. 274286.
2.
2. Borsky, P. N. (1965). “ Community reactions to sonic booms in the Oklahoma City area,” National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago.
3.
3. Brink, M. , and Wunderli, J. M. (2012). “ Response to comments on a field study of the exposure-annoyance relationship of military shooting noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 35993600.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3699263
4.
4. Brown, A. L. , and van Kamp, I. (2009). “ Response to a change in transport noise exposure: A review of evidence of a change effect,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125(5), 30183029.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3095802
5.
5.BS 6472-1:2008 (2008). “ Guide to evaluation of human response to vibration in buildings (1 Hz to 80 Hz) Part 1: Vibration sources other than blasting” (British Standards Institute).
6.
6. Dittrich, K. , and Oberfeld, D. (2009). “ A comparison of the temporal weighting of annoyance and loudness,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 31683178 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3238233
7.
7.EC/DG Environment (2002). Position paper on dose response relationships between transportation noise and Annoyance, In EC/DG Environment, Brussels.
8.
8. Fastl, H. (2005). “ Psycho-acoustics and sound quality,” in Communication Acoustics ( Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg), pp. 139162.
9.
9. Fidell, S. (2003). “ The Schultz curve 25 years later: A research perspective,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114(6), 30073015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1628246
10.
10. Fidell, S. , Mestre, V. , Schomer, P. , Berry, B. , Gjestland, T. , Vallet, M. , and Reid, T. (2011). “ A first-principles model for estimating the prevalence of annoyance with aircraft noise exposure,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130(2), 791806.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3605673
11.
11. Fidell, S. , Pearsons, K. , Silvati, L. , and Sneddon, M. (2002). “ Relationship between low-frequency aircraft noise and annoyance due to rattle and vibration,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111(4), 17431750.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1448339
12.
12. Fidell, S. , Silvati, L. , and Pearsons, K. (1999). “ Field study of the annoyance of low-frequency runway sideline noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106(3), 14081415.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.427175
13.
13. Fields, J. M. (1993). “ Effect of personal and situational variables on noise annoyance in residential areas,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93(5), 27532763.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.405851
14.
14. Gaver, W. W. (1993a). “ How do we hear in the world? Explorations in ecological acoustics,” Ecol. Psychol. 5(4), 285313.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0504_2
15.
15. Gaver, W. W. (1993b). “ What in the world do we hear?: An ecological approach to auditory event perception,” Ecol. Psychol. 5(1), 129.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0501_1
16.
16. Gidlöf-Gunnarsson, A. , Ögren, M. , Jerson, T. , and Ohrström, E. (2012). “ Railway noise annoyance and the importance of number of trains, ground vibration, and building situational factors,” Noise Health 14(59), 190201.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.99895
17.
17. Groothuis-Oudshoorn, C. G. , and Miedema, H. M. (2006). “ Multilevel grouped regression for analyzing self-reported health in relation to environmental factors: The model and its application,” Biometrical J. 48(1), 6782.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200410172
18.
18. Howarth, H. V. C. , and Griffin, M. J. (1988). “ Human response to simulated intermittent railway-induced building vibration,” J. Sound Vib. 120(2), 413420.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(88)90453-1
19.
19. Howarth, H. V. C. , and Griffin, M. J. (1991). “ Subjective reaction to vertical mechanical shocks of various waveforms,” J. Sound Vib. 147(3), 395408.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(91)90488-6
20.
20. Hubbard, H. H. , and Mayes, W. H. (1967). “ Sonic boom effects on people and structures,” NASA Special Publication 147, 6575.
21.
21.ISO 2631-1:1997. (1997). “ Mechanical vibration and shock—Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration—Part 1: General requirements” (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland).
22.
22.ISO 2631-2:2003. (2003). “ Mechanical vibration and shock—Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration—Part 2: Vibration in buildings (1 Hz to 80 Hz)” (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland).
23.
23. Janssen, S. A. , Coelho, B. Z. , Koopman, A. , Peris, E. , Groll, W. , and Wisnewska, K. (2015). “ Annoyance due to vibration from freight railway lines in the Netherlands and Poland,” in Proceedings of Euronoise 2015.
24.
24. Job, R. F. S. (1988). “ Community response to noise: A review of factors influencing the relationship between noise exposure and reaction,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83(3), 9911001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.396524
25.
25. Klæboe, R. , Ohrström, E. , Turunen-Rise, I. H. , Bendtsen, H. , and Nykanen, H. (2003a). “ Vibration in dwellings from road and rail traffic. Part III: Towards a common methodology for socio-vibrational surveys,” Appl. Acoust. 64(1), 111120.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-682X(02)00054-3
26.
26. Klæboe, R. , Turunen-Rise, I. H. , Hårvik, L. , and Madshus, C. (2003b). “ Vibration in dwellings from road and rail traffic. Part II: Exposure-effect relationships based on ordinal logit and logistic regression models,” Appl. Acoust. 64(1), 89109.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-682X(02)00053-1
27.
27. Kryter, K. D. (2007). “ Acoustical, sensory, and psychological research data and procedures for their use in predicting effects of environmental noises,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122(5), 26012614.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2782748
28.
28. Laszlo, H. , McRobie, E. , Stansfeld, S. , and Hansell, A. (2012). “ Annoyance and other reaction measures to changes in noise exposure. A review,” Sci. Total Environ. 435, 551562.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.112
29.
29. Long, J. S. (1997). Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables ( Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks).
30.
30. Marquis-Favre, C. (2005). “ Noise and its effects. A review on qualitative aspects of sound. Part II: Noise and annoyance,” Acta Acust. Acust. 91(4), 626642.
31.
31. Marquis-Favre, C. , and Premat, E. (2005). “ Noise and its effects. A review on qualitative aspects of sound. Part I: Notions and acoustic ratings,” Acta Acust. Acust. 91(4), 613625.
32.
32. Miedema, H. M. , and Oudshoorn, C. G. (2001). “ Annoyance from transportation noise: Relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals,” Environ. Health Persp. 109(4), 409416.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.01109409
33.
33. Peris, E. , Woodcock, J. , Sica, G. , Sharp, C. , Moorhouse, A. T. , and Waddington, D. C. (2014). “ Effect of situational, attitudinal and demographic factors on railway vibration annoyance in residential areas,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 135(1), 194204.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4836495
34.
34. Persson Waye, K. , Janssen, S. , Waddington, D. C. , Groll, W. , Croy, I. , Hammar, O. , Koopman, A. , Moorhouse, A. , Peris, E. , Sharp, C. , Smith, M. G. , Vos, H. , Woodcock, J. , and Ögren, M. (2014). “ Rail freight vibration impacts sleep and community response: An overview of CargoVibes,” in Proceedings of ICBEN 2014.
35.
35. Schomer, P. , Mestre, V. , Fidell, S. , Berry, B. , Gjestland, T. , Vallet, M. , and Reid, T. (2012). “ Role of community tolerance level (CTL) in predicting the prevalence of the annoyance of road and rail noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131(4), 27722786.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3688762
36.
36. Schomer, P. , and Neathammer, R. (1987). “ The role of helicopter noise-induced vibration and rattle in human response,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 81(4), 966976.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.394523
37.
37. Sharp, C. , Woodcock, J. , Sica, G. , Peris, E. , Moorhouse, A. T. , and Waddington, D. C. (2014). “ Exposure-response relationships for annoyance due to freight and passenger railway vibration exposure in residential environments,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 135(1), 205212.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4836115
38.
38. Sica, G. , Peris, E. , Woodcock, J. , Moorhouse, A. T. , and Waddington, D. C. (2014). “ Design of measurement methodology for the evaluation of human exposure to vibration in residential environments,” Sci. Total Environ. 482, 461471.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.006
39.
39. Turunen-Rise, I. H. , Brekke, A. , Hårvik, L. , Madshus, C. , and Klæboe, R. (2003). “ Vibration in dwellings from road and rail traffic. Part I: A new Norwegian measurement standard and classification system,” Appl. Acoust. 64(1), 7187.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-682X(02)00052-X
40.
40. Waddington, D. C. , Woodcock, J. , Peris, E. , Condie, J. , Sica, G. , Moorhouse, A. T. , and Steele, A. (2014). “ Human response to vibration in residential environments,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 135(1), 182193.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4836496
41.
41. Whittle, N. , Peris, E. , Condie, J. , Woodcock, J. , Brown, P. , Moorhouse, A. T. , Waddington, D. C. , and Steele, A. (2015). “ Development of a social survey for the study of vibration annoyance in residential environments: Good practice guidance,” Appl. Acoust. 87, 8393 (2015).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.06.015
42.
42. Williams, R. (2006). “ Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables,” Stata J. 6(1), 5882.
43.
43. Woodcock, J. , Moorhouse, A. T. , and Waddington, D. C. (2014). “ A multidimensional evaluation of the perception and annoyance caused by railway induced groundborne vibration,” Acta Acust. Acust. 100(4), 614627.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3813/AAA.918741
44.
44. Woodcock, J. , Peris, E. , Condie, J. , Sica, G. , Koziel, K. , Evans, T. , Moorhouse, A. , Steele, A. , and Waddington, D. (2011). “ Human response to vibration in residential environments (NANR209),” Determination of Exposure-response Relationships Technical Report 6 (Defra, London).
45.
45. Yano, T. (2005). “ Community response to Shinkansen noise and vibration: A survey in areas along the Sanyo Shinkansen Line,” in Proceedings of Forum Acusticum 2005, pp. 18371841.
46.
46. Zapfe, J. A. , Saurenman, H. , and Fidell, S. (2009). “ Ground-borne noise and vibration in buildings caused by rail transit” (Transportation Research Board).
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/139/3/10.1121/1.4944563
Loading
/content/asa/journal/jasa/139/3/10.1121/1.4944563
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/139/3/10.1121/1.4944563
2016-03-21
2016-12-05

Abstract

The present research quantifies the influence of source type and the presence of audible vibration-induced rattle on annoyance caused by vibration in residential environments. The sources of vibration considered are railway and the construction of a light rail system. Data were measured in the United Kingdom using a socio-vibration survey ( = 1281). These data are analyzed using ordinal logit models to produce exposure-response relationships describing community annoyance as a function of vibration exposure. The influence of source type and the presence of audible vibration-induced rattle on annoyance are investigated using dummy variable analysis, and quantified using odds–ratios and community tolerance levels. It is concluded that the sample population is more likely to express higher levels of annoyance if the vibration source is construction compared to railway, and if vibration-induced rattle is audible.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/asa/journal/jasa/139/3/1.4944563.html;jsessionid=bA8zgbpNh-n1Zcxl-v8XEebE.x-aip-live-06?itemId=/content/asa/journal/jasa/139/3/10.1121/1.4944563&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/asa/journal/jasa
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=asadl.org/jasa/139/3/10.1121/1.4944563&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/jasa/139/3/10.1121/1.4944563'
Right1,Right2,Right3,