No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Audibility of dispersion error in room acoustic finite-difference time-domain simulation as a function of simulation distance
1. M. Aretz, “ Specification of realistic boundary conditions for the FE simulation of low frequency sound fields in recording studios,” Acta Acust. Acust. 95, 874–882 (2009).
2. N. Raghuvanshi, R. Narain, and M. Lin, “ Efficient and accurate sound propagation using adaptive rectangular decomposition,” IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graphics 15, 789–801 (2009).
3. L. Savioja and V. Välimäki, “ Reducing the dispersion error in the digital waveguide mesh using interpolation and frequency-warping techniques,” IEEE Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process. 8, 184–194 (2000).
5. B. Hamilton and S. Bilbao, “ On finite difference schemes for the 3-D wave equation using non-Cartesian grids,” in Proceedings of Sound and Music Computing Conference, Stockholm, Sweden (2013), pp. 592–599.
7. L. Savioja, “ Real-time 3D finite-difference time-domain simulation of low- and mid-frequency room acoustics,” in 13th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects, Graz, Austria (2010), pp. 77–84.
8. B. Hamilton and C. J. Webb, “ Room acoustics modelling using GPU-accelerated finite difference and finite volume methods on a face-centered cubic grid,” in 16th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects, Maynooth, Ireland (2013), pp. 336–343.
9. J. B. Schneider and C. L. Wagner, “ FDTD dispersion revisited: Faster-than-light propagation,” IEEE Microwave Guided Wave Lett. 9, 54–56 (1999).
10. A. Southern, D. Murphy, T. Lokki, and L. Savioja, “ The perceptual effects of dispersion error on room acoustic model auralization,” in Proceeding Forum Acusticum, Aalborg, Denmark (2011), pp. 1553–1558.
11. A. Taflove, Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method, 2nd ed. ( Artech House, Boston, 2000), Chap. 5, pp. 175–233.
12. M. Cobos, J. Escolano, J. J. López, and B. Pueo, “ Subjective effects of dispersion in the simulation of room acoustics using digital waveguide mesh,” in 124th Convention of Audio Engineering Society, Amsterdam, Netherlands (2008), Paper No. 7471.
13. J. H. Patterson and D. M. Green, “ Discrimination of transient signals having identical energy spectra,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 48, 894–905 (1970).
15. J. Deer, P. Bloom, and D. Preis, “ Perception of phase distortion in all-pass filters,” J. Audio Eng. Soc. 33, 782–786 (1985).
16. S. Flanagan, B. C. Moore, and M. A. Stone, “ Discrimination of group delay in click-like signals presented via headphones and loudspeakers,” J. Audio Eng. Soc. 53, 593–611 (2005).
17. H. Møller, P. Minnaar, S. K. Olesen, F. Christensen, and J. Plogsties, “ On the audibility of all-pass phase in electroacoustical transfer functions,” J. Audio Eng. Soc. 55, 113–134 (2007).
18. A. Gourlay and A. Mitchell, “ A classification of split difference methods for hyperbolic equations in several space dimensions,” SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 6, 62–71 (1969).
19. M. van Walstijn and K. Kowalczyk, “ On the numerical solution of the 2D wave equation with compact FDTD schemes,” in 11th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects, Espoo, Finland (2008), pp. 205–212.
20. G. A. Soulodre, “ Evaluation of objective loudness meters,” in 116th Convention of Audio Engineering Society, Berlin, Germany (2004), Paper No. 6161.
22. S. P. McKee, S. A. Klein, and D. Y. Teller, “ Statistical properties of forced-choice psychometric functions: Implications of probit analysis,” Percept. Psychophys. 37, 286–298 (1985).
Article metrics loading...
Finite-difference time-domain(FDTD) simulation has been a popular area of research in room acoustics due to its capability to simulate wave phenomena in a wide bandwidth directly in the time-domain. A downside of the method is that it introduces a direction and frequency dependent error to the simulated sound field due to the non-linear dispersion relation of the discrete system. In this study, the perceptual threshold of the dispersion error is measured in three-dimensional FDTD schemes as a function of simulation distance. Dispersion error is evaluated for three different explicit, non-staggered FDTD schemes using the numerical wavenumber in the direction of the worst-case error of each scheme. It is found that the thresholds for the different schemes do not vary significantly when the phase velocity error level is fixed. The thresholds are found to vary significantly between the different sound samples. The measured threshold for the audibility of dispersion error at the probability level of 82% correct discrimination for three-alternative forced choice is found to be 9.1 m of propagation in a free field, that leads to a maximum group delay error of 1.8 ms at 20 kHz with the chosen phase velocity error level of 2%.
Full text loading...
Most read this month