Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
J. Morgan, From Simple Input to Complex Grammar ( MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1986).
M. Nespor and I. Vogel, Prosodic Phonology ( Foris, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 1986).
M. M. Kjelgaard and S. R. Speer, “ Prosodic facilitation and interference in the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguity,” J. Mem. Lang. 40, 153194 (1999).
S. Millotte, R. Wales, and A. Christophe, “ Phrasal prosody disambiguates syntax,” Lang. Cogn. Process. 22, 898909 (2007).
S. Millotte, A. René, R. Wales, and A. Christophe, “ Phonological phrase boundaries constrain the online syntactic analysis of spoken sentences,” J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 34, 874885 (2008).
J. Snedeker and J. Trueswell, “ Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context,” J. Mem. Lang. 48, 103130 (2003).
J. Snedeker and J. Trueswell, “ Unheeded cues: Prosody and syntactic ambiguity in mother-child communication,” Paper presented at the 26th Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA (2001).
J. Snedeker and S. Yuan, “ Effects of prosodic and lexical constraints on parsing in young children (and adults),” J. Mem. Lang. 58, 574608 (2008).
I. Vogel and E. Raimy, “ The acquisition of compound vs. phrasal stress: The role of prosodic constituents,” J. Child Lang. 29, 225250 (2002).
Y. Choi and R. Mazuka, “ Young children's use of prosody in sentence parsing,” J. Psycholinguist. Res. 32, 197217 (2003).
M. Soderstrom, A. Seidl, D. G. Kemler Nelson, and P. W. Jusczyk, “ The prosodic bootstrapping of phrases: Evidence from prelinguistic infants,” J. Mem. Lang. 49, 249267 (2003).
A. Gout, A. Christophe, and J. L. Morgan, “ Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access II. Infant data,” J. Mem. Lang. 51, 548567 (2004).
E. K. Johnson, “ Infants use prosodically conditioned acoustic-phonetic cues to extract words from speech,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123, EL144EL148 (2008).
A. de Carvalho, I. Dautriche, and A. Christophe, “ Preschoolers use phrasal prosody online to constrain syntactic analysis,” Dev. Sci. 19, 235250 (2016).
W. E. Cooper and J. Paccia-Cooper, Syntax and Speech ( Harvard University Press, Boston, MA, 1980).
M. Soderstrom, M. Blossom, R. Foygel, and J. Morgan, “ Acoustical cues and grammatical units in speech to two preverbal infants,” J. Child Lang. 35, 869902 (2008).
A. W. F. Huggins, “ Just noticeable differences for segment duration in natural speech,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 51, 12701278 (1972).
T. F. Jaeger, “ Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models,” J. Mem. Lang. 59, 434446 (2008).
L. Gleitman, “ The structural sources of verb meanings,” Lang. Acquis. 1, 355 (1990).
A. de Carvalho, I. Dautriche, and A. Christophe, “ Phrasal prosody constrains online syntactic analysis in two-year-old children,” Paper presented at the 39th Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA (2014).
S. Massicotte-Laforge and R. Shi, “ The role of prosody in infants' early syntactic analysis and grammatical categorization,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 138, 441446 (2015).
A. de Carvalho, A. He, J. Lidz, and A. Christophe, “ 18-month-olds use the relationship between prosodic and syntactic structures to constrain the meaning of novel words,” Paper presented at the 40th Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA (2015).

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



This study tested American preschoolers' ability to use phrasal prosody to constrain their syntactic analysis of locally ambiguous sentences containing noun/verb homophones (e.g., [The baby flies] [hide in the shadows] vs [The baby] [flies his kite], brackets indicate prosodic boundaries). The words following the homophone were masked, such that prosodic cues were the only disambiguating information. In an oral completion task, 4- to 5-year-olds successfully exploited the sentence's prosodic structure to assign the appropriate syntactic category to the target word, mirroring previous results in French (but challenging previous English-language results) and providing cross-linguistic evidence for the role of phrasal prosody in children's syntactic analysis.


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd