Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/asa/journal/jasa/140/1/10.1121/1.4958916
1.
R. W. Paterson, P. G. Vogt, M. R. Fink, and C. L. Munch, “ Vortex noise of isolated airfoils,” J. Aircraft 10(5), 296302 (1973).
http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/3.60229
2.
C. K. W. Tam, “ Discrete tones of isolated airfoils,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 55(6), 11731177 (1974).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1914682
3.
H. Arbey and J. Bataille, “ Noise generated by airfoils profiles placed in a uniform laminar flow,” J. Fluid Mech. 134, 3347 (1983).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022112083003201
4.
E. C. Nash, M. V. Lowson, and A. McAlpine, “ Boundary-layer instability noise on aerofoils,” J. Fluid Mech. 382, 2761 (1999).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S002211209800367X
5.
C. K. W. Tam and H. Ju, “ Aerofoil tones at moderate Reynolds number,” J. Fluid Mech. 690, 536570 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2011.465
6.
G. Desquesnes, M. Terracol, and P. Sagaut, “ Numerical investigation of the tone noise mechanism over laminar airfoils,” J. Fluid Mech. 591, 155182 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022112007007896
7.
S. Probsting, J. Serpieri, and F. Scarano, “ Experimental investigation of aerofoil tonal noise generation,” J. Fluid Mech. 747, 656687 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2014.156
8.
S. Moreau, M. Henner, G. Iaccarino, M. Wang, and M. Roger, “ Analysis of flow conditions in freejet experiments for studying airfoil self noise,” AIAA J. 41(10), 18951905 (2003).
http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/2.1905
9.
M. Roger and S. Moreau, “ Broadband self-noise from loaded fan blades,” AIAA J. 42(3), 536544 (2004).
http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/1.9108
10.
S. Moreau and M. Roger, “ Effect of airfoil aerodynamic loading on trailing edge noise source,” AIAA J. 43(1), 4152 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/1.5578
11.
M. Wang, S. Moreau, G. Iaccarino, and M. Roger, “ LES prediction of wall-pressure fluctuations and noise of a low-speed airfoil,” Int. J. Aeroacoust. 8(3), 177197 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1260/147547208786940017
12.
J. Christophe, S. Moreau, C. W. Hamman, J. A. S. Witteveen, and G. Iaccarino, “ Uncertainty quantification for the trailing-edge noise of a controlled-diffusion airfoil,” AIAA J. 53(1), 4254 (2015).
http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/1.J051696
13.
T. Padois, P. Laffay, A. Idier, and S. Moreau, “ Detailed experimental investigation of the areoacoustic field around a controlled-diffusion airfoil,” in 21th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Dallas, TX, 22–26 June, 2015.
14.
T. P. Chong and P. Joseph, “ Ladder structure in tonal noise generated by laminar flow around airfoil,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131(6), EL461EL467 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4710952
15.
P. Salas and S. Moreau, “ Aeroacoustic simulations of a simplified high-lift device accounting for installation effects,” in 21th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Dallas, Texas, 22–26 June, 2015.
16.
D. J. Moreau, L. A. Brooks, and C. J. Doolan, “ On the aeroacoustic tonal noise generation mechanism of a sharp-edged plate,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129(4), EL154EL160 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3565472
17.
C. Torrence and G. Compo, “ A practical guide to wavelet analysis,” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 79, 6178 (1998).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0061:APGTWA>2.0.CO;2
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/140/1/10.1121/1.4958916
Loading
/content/asa/journal/jasa/140/1/10.1121/1.4958916
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/140/1/10.1121/1.4958916
2016-07-22
2016-12-06

Abstract

The acoustic signature of a controlled-diffusion airfoil immersed in a flow is experimentally characterized. Acoustic measurements have been carried out in an anechoic open-jet-wind-tunnel for low Reynolds numbers (from 5 × 104 to 4.3 × 105) and several angles of attack. As with the NACA0012, the acoustic spectrum is dominated by discrete tones. These tonal behaviors are divided into three different regimes. The first one is characterized by a dominant primary tone which is steady over time, surrounded by secondary peaks. The second consists of two unsteady primary tones associated with secondary peaks and the third consists of a hump dominated by several small peaks. A wavelet study allows one to identify an amplitude modulation of the acoustic signal mainly for the unsteady tonal regime. This amplitude modulation is equal to the frequency interval between two successive tones. Finally, a bispectral analysis explains the presence of tones at higher frequencies.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/asa/journal/jasa/140/1/1.4958916.html;jsessionid=WvcN_bLdNbf2lXYYgf_iw04s.x-aip-live-06?itemId=/content/asa/journal/jasa/140/1/10.1121/1.4958916&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/asa/journal/jasa
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=asadl.org/jasa/140/1/10.1121/1.4958916&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/jasa/140/1/10.1121/1.4958916'
Right1,Right2,Right3,