Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/asa/journal/jasa/140/2/10.1121/1.4959600
1.
Billings, C. J. , Bennett, K. O. , Molis, M. R. , and Leek, M. R. (2011). “ Cortical encoding of signals in noise: Effects of stimulus type and recording paradigm,” Ear Hear 32, 5360.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181ec5c46
2.
Billings, C. J. , Penman, T. M. , McMillan, G. P. , and Ellis, E. (2015). “ Electrophysiology and perception of speech in noise in older listeners: Effects of hearing impairment and age,” Ear Hear 36(6), 710722.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000191
3.
Billings, C. J. , Tremblay, K. L. , Stecker, G. C. , and Tolin, W. M. (2009). “ Human evoked cortical activity to signal-to-noise ratio and absolute signal level,” Hear. Res. 254(1), 1524.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2009.04.002
4.
Čeponiené, R. , Shestakova, A. , Balan, P. , Alku, P. , Yiaguchi, K. , and Naatanen, R. (2001). “ Children's auditory event-related potentials index sound complexity and ‘speechness,' Int. J. Neurosci. 109(3-4), 245260.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00207450108986536
5.
Martin, B. A. , Tremblay, K. L. , and Korczak, P. (2008). “ Speech evoked potentials: From the laboratory to the clinic,” Ear Hear 29(3), 285313.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181662c0e
6.
McCandless, G. A. , and Best, L. (1966). “ Summed evoked responses using pure-tone stimuli,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 9(2), 266272.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/jshr.0902.266
7.
Michalewski, H. J. , Starr, A. , Zeng, F. G. , and Dimitrijevic, A. (2009). “ N100 cortical potentials accompanying disrupted auditory nerve activity in auditory neuropathy (AN): Effects of signal intensity and continuous noise,” Clin. Neurophysiol. 120(7), 13521363.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2009.05.013
8.
Onishi, S. , and Davis, H. (1968). “ Effects of duration and rise time of tone bursts on evoked V potentials,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 44(2), 582591.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1911124
9.
Papesh, M. A. , Billings, C. J. , and Baltzell, L. S. (2015). “ Background noise can enhance cortical auditory evoked potentials under certain conditions,” Clin. Neurophysiol. 126(7), 13191330.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2014.10.017
10.
Rosen, S. (1992). “ Temporal information in speech: Acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 336(1278), 367373.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1992.0070
11.
Swink, S. , and Stuart, A. (2012). “ Auditory long latency responses to tonal and speech stimuli,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 55(2), 447459.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0364)
12.
Tiitinen, H. , Sivonen, P. , Alku, P. , Virtanen, J. , and Näätänen, R. (1999). “ Electromagnetic recordings reveal latency differences in speech and tone processing in humans,” Cogn. Brain Res. 8(3), 355363.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(99)00028-2
13.
Woods, D. L. , and Elmasian, R. (1986). “ The habituation of event-related potentials to speech sounds and tones,” Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 65(6), 447459.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-5597(86)90024-9
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/140/2/10.1121/1.4959600
Loading
/content/asa/journal/jasa/140/2/10.1121/1.4959600
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/140/2/10.1121/1.4959600
2016-08-16
2016-12-05

Abstract

Use of speech signals and background noise is emerging in cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) studies; however, the interaction between signal type and noise level remains unclear. Two experiments determined the interaction between signal type and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) on CAEPs. Three signals (syllable /ba/, 1000-Hz tone, and the /ba/ envelope with 1000-Hz fine structure) with varying SNRs were used in two experiments, demonstrating signal-by-SNR interactions due to both envelope and spectral characteristics. When using real-world stimuli such as speech to evoke CAEPs, temporal and spectral complexity leads to differences with traditional tonal stimuli, especially when presented in background noise.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/asa/journal/jasa/140/2/1.4959600.html;jsessionid=JGlecapOOgZ-3H9UMBz6Cv6G.x-aip-live-03?itemId=/content/asa/journal/jasa/140/2/10.1121/1.4959600&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/asa/journal/jasa
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=asadl.org/jasa/140/2/10.1121/1.4959600&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/jasa/140/2/10.1121/1.4959600'
Right1,Right2,Right3,