Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Bernstein, L. R. , and Trahiotis, C. (1985). “ Lateralization of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones: Effects of spectral locus and temporal variation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78, 514523.
Bernstein, L. R. , and Trahiotis, C. (2002). “ Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using ‘transposed stimuli,’ ” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112(3): 10261036.
Bernstein, L. R. , and Trahiotis, C. (2003). “ Enhancing interaural-delay-based extents of laterality at high frequencies by using ‘transposed stimuli,’ ” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 33353347.
Bernstein, L. R. , and Trahiotis, C. (2009). “ How sensitivity to ongoing interaural temporal disparities is affected by manipulations of temporal features of the envelopes of high-frequency stimuli,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 32343242.
Bernstein, L. R. , and Trahiotis, C. (2011a). “ Lateralization produced by envelope-based interaural temporal disparities of high-frequency, raised-sine stimuli: Empirical data and modeling,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129, 15011508.
Bernstein, L. R. , and Trahiotis, C. (2011b). “ Lateralization produced by interaural intensitive disparities appears to be larger for high- vs low-frequency stimuli,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129, EL15EL20.
Bernstein, L. R. , and Trahiotis, C. (2011c). “ Lateralization produced by interaural temporal and intensitive disparities of high-frequency, raised-sine stimuli: Data and modeling,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 409415.
Blauert, J. , Bruggen, M. , Hartung, K. , Bronkhorst, A. , Drullmann, R. , Reynaud, G. , Pellieux, L. , Krebber, W. , and Sotteck, R. (1998). “ The AUDIS catalog of human HRTFs,” in 16th Int. Congr. Acoust., ICA, Inst. of Physics, New York.
Boyd, A. W. , Whitmer, W. M. , Brimijoin, W. O. , and Akeroyd, M. A. (2013). “ Improved estimation of direction of arrival of sound sources for hearing aids using gyroscopic information,” Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. 19, 030046.
Cosentino, S. , Marquardt, T. , and McAlpine, D. (2012). “ A hybrid channel selection algorithm for dereverberation in cochlear implants,” in 35th Mid-Winter Meeting Association for Research in Otolaryngology, San Diego, CA.
Faller, C. , and Merimaa, J. (2004). “ Source localization in complex listening situations: Selection of binaural cues based on interaural coherence,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 30753089.
Flanagan, J. L. (1960). “ Analog measurements of sound radiation from the mouth,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 32(12), 16131620.
Francart, T. , Lenssen, A. , and Wouters, J. (2014). “ Modulation enhancement in the electrical signal improves perception of interaural time differences with bimodal stimulation,” J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 15(4), 633647.
Geurts, L. , and Wouters, J. (2001). “ Coding of the fundamental frequency in continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 713726.
Green, T. , Faulkner, A. , and Rosen, S. (2004). “ Enhancing temporal cues to voice pitch in continuous interleaved sampling cochlear implants,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 22982310.
Hartley, D. E. H. , and Isaiah, A. (2014). “ Envelope enhancement increases cortical sensitivity to interaural envelope delays with acoustic and electric hearing,” PLoS One 9(8), e104097.
Hazrati, O. , Lee, J. , and Loizou, P. C. (2013). “ Blind binary masking for reverberation suppression in cochlear implants,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133, 16071614.
Jeub, M. , Dorbecker, M. , and Vary, P. (2011). “ A semi-analytical model for the binaural coherence of noise fields,” IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 18, 197200.
Kerber, S. , and Seeber, B. U. (2013). “ Localization in reverberation with cochlear implants,” J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 14, 379392.
Klein-Hennig, M. , Dietz, M. , Hohmann, V. , and Ewert, S. D. (2011). “ The influence of different segments of the ongoing envelope waveform on sensitivity to interaural time differences,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129, 38563872.
Kokkinakis, K. , Hazrati, O. , and Loizou, P. C. (2011). “ A channel-selection criterion for suppressing reverberation in cochlear implants,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129, 32213232.
Kokkinakis, K. , and Loizou, P. C. (2008). “ Using blind source separation techniques to improve speech recognition in bilateral cochlear implant patients,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123, 23792390.
Koning, R. , and Wouters, J. (2012). “ The potential of onset enhancement for increased speech intelligibility in auditory prostheses,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132, 25692581.
Laback, B. , Majdak, P. , and Baumgartner, W.-D. (2007). “ Lateralization discrimination of interaural time delays in four-pulse sequences in electric and acoustic hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 21822191.
Laback, B. , Zimmermann, I. , Majdak, P. , Baumgartner, W. D. , and Pok, S. M. (2011). “ Effects of envelope shape on interaural envelope delay sensitivity in acoustic and electric hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130, 15151529.
Levitt, H. (1971). “ Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49, 467477.
Milczynski, M. , Chang, J. E. , Wouters, J. , and van Wieringen, A. (2012). “ Perception of Mandarin Chinese with cochlear implants using enhanced temporal pitch cues,” Hear. Res. 285, 112.
Milczynski, M. , Wouters, J. , and van Wieringen, A. (2009). “ Improved fundamental frequency coding in cochlear implant signal processing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 22602271.
Mills, A. W. (1958). “ On the minimum audible angle,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 30(4), 237247.
Monaghan, J. J. M. , Bleeck, S. , and McAlpine, D. (2015). “ Sensitivity to envelope interaural time differences at high modulation rates,” Trends Hear. 19, 114.
Monaghan, J. J. M. , Krumbholz, K. , and Seeber, B. U. (2013). “ Factors affecting the use of envelope interaural time differences in reverberation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133, 22882300.
Moore, B. C. (2003). “ Coding of sounds in the auditory system and its relevance to signal processing and coding in cochlear implants,” Otol. Neurotol. 24, 243254.
Poissant, S. F. , Whitmal, N. A. , 3rd, and Freyman, R. L. (2006). “ Effects of reverberation and masking on speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 16061615.
Rothauser, E. H. , Chapman, W. D. , Guttman, N. , Nordby, K. S. , Silbiger, H. R. , Urbanek, G. E. , and Weinstock, M. (1969). “ IEEE recommended practice for speech quality measurements,” IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. 17, 227246.
Seeber, B. U. , and Fastl, H. (2008). “ Localization cues with bilateral cochlear implants,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123, 10301042.
Seeber, B. U. , and Hafter, E. R. (2011). “ Failure of the precedence effect with a noise-band vocoder,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129(3), 15091521.
Seeber, B. U. , Kerber, S. , and Hafter, E. R. (2010). “ A system to simulate and reproduce audio-visual environments for spatial hearing research,” Hear. Res. 260, 110.
Tsilfidis, A. , Georganti, E. , Kokkinis, E. K. , and Mourjopoulos, J. (2011). “ Speech dereverberation based on a recorded handclap,” in 2011 17th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing (DSP), pp. 16.
Tsilfidis, A. , and Mourjopoulos, J. (2012). “ Blind single-channel suppression of late reverberation based on perceptual reverberation modeling,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129, 14391451.
van Hoesel, R. J. , and Tyler, R. S. (2003). “ Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 16171630.
Verschuur, C. , Lutman, M. , and Wahat, N. H. (2006). “ Evaluation of a non-linear spectral subtraction noise suppression scheme in cochlear implant users,” Cochlear Implants Int. 7, 193196.
Wittkop, T. , Albani, S. , Hohmann, V. , Peissig, J. , Woods, W. S. , and Kollmeier, B. (1997). “ Speech processing for hearing aids: Noise reduction motivated by models of binaural interaction,” Acta Acust. Acust. 83, 684699.
Wu, M. , and Wang, D. L. (2006). “ A two-stage algorithm for one microphone reverberant speech enhancement,” IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 14, 774784.

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



The ability of normal-hearing (NH) listeners to exploit interaural time difference (ITD) cues conveyed in the modulated envelopes of high-frequency sounds is poor compared to ITD cues transmitted in the temporal fine structure at low frequencies. Sensitivity to envelope ITDs is further degraded when envelopes become less steep, when modulation depth is reduced, and when envelopes become less similar between the ears, common factors when listening in reverberant environments. The vulnerability of envelope ITDs is particularly problematic for cochlear implant (CI) users, as they rely on information conveyed by slowly varying amplitude envelopes. Here, an approach to improve access to envelope ITDs for CIs is described in which, rather than attempting to reduce reverberation, the perceptual saliency of cues relating to the source is increased by selectively sharpening peaks in the amplitude envelope judged to contain reliable ITDs. Performance of the algorithm with room reverberation was assessed through simulating listening with bilateral CIs in headphone experiments with NH listeners. Relative to simulated standard CI processing, stimuli processed with the algorithm generated lower ITD discrimination thresholds and increased extents of laterality. Depending on parameterization, intelligibility was unchanged or somewhat reduced. The algorithm has the potential to improve spatial listening with CIs.


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd