1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Effect of heat treatments and coatings on the outgassing rate of stainless steel chambers
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1116/1.4853795
/content/avs/journal/jvsta/32/2/10.1116/1.4853795
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/avs/journal/jvsta/32/2/10.1116/1.4853795

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Schematic of the outgassing measurement experimental apparatus during a 400 °C bake showing the chamber, SRG, isolation valve, and pumps. For bakes at lower temperature, the first isolation valve, the ion pump, and the RGA were within the oven.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Representative rate-of-rise data at four room temperatures. These data were obtained using the SS1 stainless steel chamber, and correspond to outgassing rates between 1.4 × 10−13 and 5.5 × 10−13 Torr L s−1 cm−2 following a 150 °C bake (third in the series noted in Table I ). A least-square linear fit was used for each data set to calculate outgassing rates.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Outgassing rates for the bare stainless steel (SS1) chamber as a function of inverse room temperature, with each data set obtained following a bake at the temperature noted in the legend. The error bars for statistical and systematic errors are smaller than the data points for these data. The slope yields the temperature dependent activation energy as described in thetext.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Outgassing rates for the a-Si and the SS1:a-Si chambers as a function of inverse room temperature, with each data set obtained following a bake at the temperature noted in the legend. The low outgassing rate of the heat treated SS1 chamber (solid stars) was largely preserved following coating the chamber with a-Si and baking. The error bars for statistical and systematic error are comparable in size to the data points shown for these data.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Outgassing rates for the TiN-coated stainless steel chamber as a function of inverse room temperature, with each data set obtained following a bake at the temperature noted in the legend. The best outgassing rate for the SS1 bare stainless steel chamber is plotted for reference. Systematic and statistical errors, though small at larger outgassing rates, become significant at the lowest measured outgassing rates.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

EDS and SEM data show coating composition and morphology for (a) bare stainless steel, showing expected composition and morphology, (b)a-Si on stainless steel, with a Si peak evident in conjunction with the steel substrate, and (c) TiN coating with approximately 1:1 atomic ratio of Ti and N, but obvious particulate matter and pores visible across the surface. Inset SEM images each show an120 × 80 m area.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Outgassing rates for each chamber are plotted vs the Fourier number, . The straight line represents the calculated outgassing rate for the systems using Fick's law, disregarding surface effects. For the steel chambers, the transition from diffusion limited reduction in outgassing rate to recombination limited behavior occurs near  = 1, with the outgassing rates vs in close agreement with Fick's law at low (see inset), and diverging from Fick's law toward recombination limited behavior at higher values. The a-Si chambers have outgassing rate largely independent of , suggesting that the surface effects of the system dominate the outgassing, and diffusion of hydrogen from the material during bakes is not significant. The steep slope of the TiN indicates either an excellent diffusion barrier or a slight pumping speed in the coating that increases with additional heat treatment. Note: data labeled SS2 is from previously published data (Ref. 2 ).

Tables

Generic image for table
TABLE I.

Uncoated chamber (SS1) bake history and corresponding outgassing rate at 20 °C.

Generic image for table
TABLE II.

Amorphous silicon coated (a-Si) chamber bake history and corresponding outgassing rates at 20 °C.

Generic image for table
TABLE III.

Chamber coated with amorphous silicon following heat treatment (SS1:a-Si) bake history and corresponding outgassing rate at 20 °C. The outgassing rate of SS1 prior to coating with a-Si was 1 × 10−13 Torr L s−1 cm−2.

Generic image for table
TABLE IV.

Titanium nitride coated chamber (TiN) bake history and corresponding outgassing rate at 20 °C. Outgassing rates may be artificially low if there is any pump speed in the system, and the inhomogeneity found in the EDS analysis suggests the presence of some elemental Ti.

Generic image for table
TABLE V.

Coating thickness and RMS roughness values for bare steel, TiN coated and a-Si coated test samples.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/avs/journal/jvsta/32/2/10.1116/1.4853795
2013-12-27
2014-04-20
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Effect of heat treatments and coatings on the outgassing rate of stainless steel chambers
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/avs/journal/jvsta/32/2/10.1116/1.4853795
10.1116/1.4853795
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM