1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Modeling, fabrication, and experimental application of clear x-ray phase masks
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1116/1.1809626
/content/avs/journal/jvstb/22/6/10.1116/1.1809626
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/avs/journal/jvstb/22/6/10.1116/1.1809626

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Plot of the x-ray intensity profile illustrating Fresnel diffraction for the opaque material and phase contributions for partially transparent materials.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Plot of the intensity profile when the intensity profiles from two absorbers are positioned to optimally interfere. Note, each edge intensity profile shown is positioned for an absorber edge terminating at zero.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Plot of the intensity profile dependence on phase-shift angle or absorber thickness.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Plot of the intensity profiles of the enhanced bright peaks showing the curvature dependence on phase-shift angle; the intensities are normalized to the same peak value.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Plot of the regions of the aerial feature width as a function of gap.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Plot showing the good correlation between experimental data and those modeled.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

SEM images from a mask feature showing feature reduction: (a) an exposure of the resist sensitivity produced a printed image of , whereas (b) an exposure of produced a printed feature of .

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Plot of the experimental mask intensity profile compared to the intensity profile of an ideal absorber. Limits of the experimental dose range of and normalized dose are also shown.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Plot showing the enhanced bright peak intensity profile curvature near the peak compared to a theoretically opaque material; the peak appears little affected by phase effects when normalized for delivered dose.

Tables

Generic image for table
TABLE I.

Percent transmission and thickness at monochromatic wavelengths.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/avs/journal/jvstb/22/6/10.1116/1.1809626
2004-12-14
2014-04-18
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Modeling, fabrication, and experimental application of clear x-ray phase masks
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/avs/journal/jvstb/22/6/10.1116/1.1809626
10.1116/1.1809626
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM