1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Nanostructures produced by ultraviolet laser irradiation of silicon. I. Rippled structures
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1116/1.1821575
/content/avs/journal/jvstb/22/6/10.1116/1.1821575
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/avs/journal/jvstb/22/6/10.1116/1.1821575

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Reciprocal space of the substrate surface. The direction of the incident light projected on the substrate surface defines the direction of positive . , , and are experimentally measurable lengths proportional to , , and , respectively.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Early stage of ripple formation. AFM image suggesting an evolution of the surface with increasing number of laser pulses, until the proper conditions are achieved for the ripples to propagate. Specimen irradiated with 400 pulses of a single beam of -polarized light incident at . Laser fluence of ; He atmosphere at a pressure of . Ripple spacing from FFT: , much less than the theoretical lowest value of .

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

AFM image and inset with FFT of a mature LIPSS structure generated at near normal incidence with 400 pulses of a single beam of -polarized light at a fluence of . The direction of the projected electric field of the electromagnetic wave is also indicated.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

AFM image of a specimen edge where incipient LIPSS can be observed. Laser fluence .

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

AFM image of sample irradiated with 2000 pulses at a laser fluence of , using a -polarized single beam at an incident angle of . FFT of the image on lower left shows two short arcs that reveal rotation of the vector (Fig. 1). The spacing measured in the lower right profile is , in very good agreement with formula (9) and with the value of obtained from the FFT.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

AFM image of sample irradiated with 50 pulses at a laser fluence of . The ripples were produced using a -polarized single beam at an incident angle of . . Notice tiny little “fingers” in lower rim of fringes and asymmetry in fringe profile taken in downward direction.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

(a) AFM image of sample irradiated with 2000 pulses of a -polarized single beam at an incident angle of . Laser fluence: . Lower left inset: FFT of the image showing two intense short arcs which are part of two circles that can be completed with the much fainter arcs close to the origin. A vector from the origin to any of the strong spots is proportional to the magnitude of the vector (Fig. 1). Lower right inset: profile from the lower to upper end along line shown in image. Notice the increase in the ripple amplitude. Measured spacing is , in very good agreement with formula (9). This spacing agrees with the value of derived from the FFT. (b) Magnified image of the region enclosed by a rectangle in (a). This region reveals the propagation of ripples (downward in the figure) from the region of fully developed ripples. The three profiles show ripple evolution at three different stages characterized by the groove depth (notice different scale in the ordinate of ).

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Schematics of the two orientations of the beam shape for a Lloyd’s mirror configuration: (a) horizontal and (b) vertical.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Ripple structure obtained after 1000 laser pulses using a Lloyd’s mirror; edge orientation relative to beam (horizontal) is illustrated in Fig. 8, (a) -polarized light incident at an angle of . Profile in lower left from trace marked on the AFM image. Ripple spacing derived from FFT in lower right inset is .

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Ripples obtained after 1000 pulses using a Lloyd’s mirror; configuration illustrated in Fig. 8(a). Nonpolarized laser light incident at .

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

AFM image of ripple structure produced with laser beam incident at , using a Lloyd’s mirror arrangement. The FFT in the inset is part of the circles in reciprocal space shown in Fig. 1. The distance between the two spots at the intersection of the two arcs equals . The distance is the intersection of the normal with the two arcs. The corresponding ripple spacings measured in the image are on the average 315 and . The ratio measured using the FFT image gives an angle of incidence of and spacings of 318 and [Eqs. (13), (17), (18), and (21)].

Image of FIG. 12.
FIG. 12.

AFM image of region displaying a much distorted ripple structure produced at , using a Lloyd’s mirror arrangement. The FFT image shows that the vectors follow the grating equation and a significant number of them are present clearly outlining part of the allowed space shown in Fig. 1. The extra faint arcs shown in the FFT are harmonics of the Fourier transform. The values of and have been used to derive the values and check the value of (Table I).

Image of FIG. 13.
FIG. 13.

AFM image of region displaying a fractured ripple structure produced at , using a Lloyd’s mirror arrangement. The FFT image shows that the vectors follow the grating equation and a significant number of them are present in order to clearly delineate all of the allowed space shown in Fig. 1. The values of and have been used to derive the values and check the value of (Table I).

Image of FIG. 14.
FIG. 14.

Line spacing vs incident angle, for ripples formed using Lloyd’s mirror. Data are listed in Table II. Notice occurrence of ripples characterized by only one set of possible values at , those that run normal to the substrate/mirror edge. A transition can be seen to occur gradually between and .

Image of FIG. 15.
FIG. 15.

Calculated temperature evolution at two locations distant during laser irradiation in silicon assuming that the spatial dependence of the fluence (in ) is given by . The lower curve is at (minimum of ) and the upper at (maximum of ). The inset shows the Gaussian temporal profile of the laser beam used for the calculation. Details of the calculation are given in the Appendix.

Tables

Generic image for table
TABLE I.

Ripple spacings and angles of incidence derived from FFT images versus calculated spacings and experimentally measured angles.

Generic image for table
TABLE II.

Nanofringe spacing at various angles of incidence of the laser beam on substrates, with Lloyd’s mirror attached— Total number of pulses: 1000.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/avs/journal/jvstb/22/6/10.1116/1.1821575
2004-11-01
2014-04-19
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Nanostructures produced by ultraviolet laser irradiation of silicon. I. Rippled structures
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/avs/journal/jvstb/22/6/10.1116/1.1821575
10.1116/1.1821575
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM