1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Plasma implanted ultra shallow junction boron depth profiles: Effect of plasma chemistry and sheath conditions
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1116/1.2137336
/content/avs/journal/jvstb/24/1/10.1116/1.2137336
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/avs/journal/jvstb/24/1/10.1116/1.2137336

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Schematic illustration showing the components of a pulse ignited glow discharge system.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Schematic illustration of the ion mass and energy spectrum measurement apparatus used to characterize the pulse ignited plasma implant system.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

SIMS depth profiles for a plasma implant and beamline implant using the “no-leak” measurement protocol.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Implanted ion energy measurements for the primary boron ions during the implant pulse of a plasma implant.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Simulated depth profile based on the measured ion mass and energy fractions from Fig. 4 and Table I, compared with the measured SIMS depth profile for the same implant conditions.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Diagram illustrating different pulse timing between the applied wafer bias pulse and the plasma ignition (HC) pulse.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

SIMS depth profiles for implants with synchronized pulse timing, wafer bias pulse applied first, and plasma pulse applied first, all implanted with the same plasma implant.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

SIMS depth profiles for the reference plasma implant vs the more collisional plasma sheath case using only the wafer bias pulse (for both the raw data and rescaled to match total implant dose with the same).

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

SIMS depth profiles for both plasma and beamline implants with and without aggressive wet chemical photoresist strip (Piranha).

Tables

Generic image for table
TABLE I.

Ion mass fractions and energy spectrum data from Fig. 4 are converted into equivalent atomic boron ion energies and partitioned into eight energy bins with corresponding dose fractions for the purpose of simulating the implant profile.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/avs/journal/jvstb/24/1/10.1116/1.2137336
2006-01-27
2014-04-24
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Plasma implanted ultra shallow junction boron depth profiles: Effect of plasma chemistry and sheath conditions
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/avs/journal/jvstb/24/1/10.1116/1.2137336
10.1116/1.2137336
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM