1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Scanning x-ray microscopy investigations into the electron-beam exposure mechanism of hydrogen silsesquioxane resists
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1116/1.2395957
/content/avs/journal/jvstb/24/6/10.1116/1.2395957
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/avs/journal/jvstb/24/6/10.1116/1.2395957
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

STXM data showing NEXAFS spectra at the oxygen edge for unexposed and exposed HSQ (each normalized to taken from a blank window) and the difference spectrum.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Left side: plot of of STXM images of latent e-beam exposure of squares in HSQ. Images are obtained at (A), (B), (C), and (D). The highest contrast is observed at . Right side: the corresponding line profiles from the vertically averaged signal across the squares.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Raw STXM images of features as a function of dose (A) and a plot of (B). [For these features: dose , i.e., dose at ]. There is a significant increase in the background optical density as the feature dose increases. The discontinuity in the graph is where STXM data were not taken.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Plot of of e-beam exposed features as a function of dose and feature size. Each feature is normalized to the same . The chemical contrast increases with increasing dose as expected but has an additional dependence on the size of feature exposed. Features sized were exposed at two pitches: (A) 1.25 and (B) .

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

AFM measurements of latent image feature thicknesses relative to background. The heights change as a function of dose and feature size.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

AFM image of latent (A) and developed (B) features on silicon nitride. Dose is . The feature (a) shows that thickness changes occur outside of the exposed area. The feature (b), an “X” is an artifact of how the e-beam is raster scanned. Features (c) and (d) are explained in the text. As the beam spirals from outside to inside, errors in placement result in lower dose as the beam passes the corners and center of the fill pattern.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Plot of for the ( pitch) features and the background between the features. AFM images [insets (A) and (B)] are taken after development. The lines with a lower mOD compared to background areas (areas between the lines exposed at much higher doses) leave thicker developed HSQ features.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/avs/journal/jvstb/24/6/10.1116/1.2395957
2006-11-30
2014-04-24
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Scanning x-ray microscopy investigations into the electron-beam exposure mechanism of hydrogen silsesquioxane resists
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/avs/journal/jvstb/24/6/10.1116/1.2395957
10.1116/1.2395957
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM