1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Nanometer-level alignment to a substrate-embedded coordinate system
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1116/1.3010734
/content/avs/journal/jvstb/26/6/10.1116/1.3010734
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/avs/journal/jvstb/26/6/10.1116/1.3010734
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Schematic of one set of diffraction paths required for generation of ISPI interference fringes from a superimposed grating pair. Numerous other diffraction paths are not shown. In order for any diffracted beam to contribute to the fringe formation, it must undergo a first-order diffraction from both and gratings. The double diffraction allows cancellation of wavelength dependence, resulting in achromatic interference fringes.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Schematic of back side ISPI marks. (a) The substrate back side mark is composed of a single period in both the and directions. (b) The complementary template mark consists of a bifurcated grating that includes two periods and . (c) The grating periods are arranged such that , resulting in counterpropagating fringe motion in response to a displacement.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

(a) Schematic of the absolute position detection method used on the back side mark. (b) Islands of a grid pattern are distributed throughout the checkerboard pattern. The separation of the islands increases monotonically (i.e., is chirped) in both the and directions. Each grid island backdiffracts incident illumination directly to the ISPI microscopes at the Littrow angle. The array of islands appears on an image sensor as a series of bright dots. A subset of the chirped dot array is within the field of view of the microscope. The imaged region is analyzed for its spatial frequency content, which provides unique coarse position identification. Fine position is detected by the phase disparity of interferometric fringes. The spatial frequency of the interference fringe sets is distinct from the range of chirp frequencies.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

(a) ISPI image of visible-light interference fringes from front side marks. (b) ISPI image of infrared interference fringes from back side marks. (c) Plot of front side ISPI measurements in response to piezosteps. Position stability was . (d)Plot of back side ISPI measurements in response to piezosteps. Position stability was . The difference in position stability is attributed to mechanical noise.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Plots of ISPI measurements taken over a 1° range of angles by adjusting an ISPI microscope with a six-axis stage. The center of rotation is controlled to coincide with the ISPI mark. Standard ISPI marks were used on the front side of the wafer. The axis is defined as the optical axis of the microscope. (a) ISPI measurements during a rotation of . The slope of the linear fit is . (b) ISPI measurements during a rotation of . The slope of the linear fit is . (c) ISPI measurements during a rotation of . The slope of the linear fit is . The jitter in the data is primarily attributed to the stage. The nominal minimum angular step size of the stage is 0.01°.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/avs/journal/jvstb/26/6/10.1116/1.3010734
2008-12-01
2014-04-18
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Nanometer-level alignment to a substrate-embedded coordinate system
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/avs/journal/jvstb/26/6/10.1116/1.3010734
10.1116/1.3010734
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM