1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Illustrating field emission theory by using Lauritsen plots of transmission probability and barrier strength
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1116/1.4765096
/content/avs/journal/jvstb/31/2/10.1116/1.4765096
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/avs/journal/jvstb/31/2/10.1116/1.4765096
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Comparison of barrier-strength dependences on inverse scaled barrier field, for the exact triangular (ET) and Schottky–Nordheim (SN) barrier models. Line PL is drawn parallel to line ET, a distance η above it. Curve SN starts at the reference point "R," at (1,0).

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

To illustrate the relationships between the SN-barrier correction functions (f), s(f) and r 2012(ϕ,f), for the specific values ϕ = 4.50 eV (η ≈ 4.637), f = 0.2. The line T(5) is the tangent to curve SN at point "P," at which f −1 = 5. The slopes of lines ET, V, and T(5) are, respectively, −η, −η· (0.2), and −η·s(0.2), and G F ET = 5η.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

To show how the barrier-form correction factor for the Coulomb barrier (ν F CL) varies with Edgcombe's parameter υ ("upsilon"), defined by Eq. (18) .

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

To show how, for a Coulomb barrier, the barrier strength for state F varies with inverse barrier field, for the work-function value 4.50 eV, and the emitter radii shown. For sufficiently small model radii, the curvature in the Lauritsen plot is detectable.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

To show how the transmission probability D F varies with inverse barrier field. (a) and (b) show results for an exact triangular barrier of height 4.50 eV, as predicted by the original Fowler–Nordheim formula (FN) and by an exact treatment (FD). (c) and (d) show results for a Schottky–Nordheim barrier of zero-field height 4.50 eV, as predicted by the usual simple-JWKB treatment (JWKB) and by the Kemble approximation (Kem). For each barrier, the left-hand figure shows the high-field (low F L −1) region in greater detail.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/avs/journal/jvstb/31/2/10.1116/1.4765096
2012-11-07
2014-04-23
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Illustrating field emission theory by using Lauritsen plots of transmission probability and barrier strength
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/avs/journal/jvstb/31/2/10.1116/1.4765096
10.1116/1.4765096
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM