Skip to main content

News about Scitation

In December 2016 Scitation will launch with a new design, enhanced navigation and a much improved user experience.

To ensure a smooth transition, from today, we are temporarily stopping new account registration and single article purchases. If you already have an account you can continue to use the site as normal.

For help or more information please visit our FAQs.

banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/lia/journal/jla/27/S2/10.2351/1.4906478
1.
1. H. C. Man, K. Y. Chiu, and X. Guo, “ Laser surface micro-drilling and texturing of metals for improvement of adhesion joint strength,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 256, 31663169 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.11.092
2.
2. M. Abbott and J. Cotter, “ Optical and electrical properties of laser texturing for high-efficiency solar cells,” Prog. Photovoltaics: Res. Appl. 14(3), 225235 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pip.667
3.
3. A.-M. Kietzig, S. G. Hatzikiriakos, and P. Englezos, “ Patterned superhydrophobic metallic surfaces,” Langmuir 25(8), 48214827 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la8037582
4.
4. I. Etsion, “ State of the art in laser surface texturing,” J. Tribol. 127(1), 248253 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.1828070
5.
5. A. G. Demir, N. Lecis, B. Previtali, and D. Ugues, “ Scratch resistance of fibre laser surface textured TiN coatings,” Surf. Eng. 29(9), 654659 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/174329413X13614824551916
6.
6. T. Kurita, T. Ono, and T. Nakai, “ A study of processed area monitoring using the strength of YAG laser processing sound,” J. Mater. Process. Technol. 112, 3742 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00883-9
7.
7. M. Stafe, C. Negutu, and I. M. Popescu, “ Real-time determination and control of the laser-drilled holes depth,” Shock Waves 14(1–2), 123126 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00193-004-0240-7
8.
8. D. P. Hand, C. Peters, F. M. Haran, and J. D. C. Jones, “ A fibre-optic-based sensor for optimization and evaluation of the laser percussion drilling process,” Meas. Sci. Technol. 8, 587592 (1997).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/8/6/001
9.
9. A. Stournaras, K. Salonitis, and G. Chryssolouris, “ Optical emissions for monitoring of the percussion laser drilling process,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 46(5–8), 589603 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2111-y
10.
10. V. Kanicky, J. Musil, and J.-M. Mermet, “ Determination of Zr and Ti in 3-μm-thick ZrTiN ceramic coating using laser ablation inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry,” Appl. Spectrosc. 51(7), 10371041 (1997).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1366/0003702971941449
11.
11. F. Le Guern, F. Brygo, P. Fichet, E. Gauthier, C. Hubert, C. Lascoutuna, D. Menut, S. Mousset, A. Semerok, M. Tabarant, and J. M. Weulersse, “ Co-deposited layer characterisation and removal control by optical emission spectroscopy coupled to nano-second laser ablation,” Fusion Eng. Des. 81, 15031509 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.09.081
12.
12. H. Balzer, M. Hoehne, V. Sturm, and R. Noll, “ Online coating thickness measurement and depth profiling of zinc coated sheet steel by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy,” Spectrochim. Acta Part B 60, 11721178 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2005.07.003
13.
13. C. Grisolia, A. Semerok, J. Weulersse, F. Leguern, S. Fomichev, F. Brygo, P. Fichet, P. Thro, P. Coad, and N. Bekris, “ In-situ tokamak laser applications for detritiation and co-deposited layers studied,” J. Nucl. Mater. 363–365, 11381147 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.169
14.
14. J. Ruiz, A. González, L. M. Cabalín, and J. J. Laserna, “ On-line laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy determination of magnesium coating thickness on electrolytically galvanized steel in motion,” Appl. Spectrosc. 64(12), 13421349 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1366/000370210793561510
15.
15. S. Döring, S. Richter, S. Nolte, and S. Tünnermann, “In situ imaging of hole shape evolution in ultrashort pulse laser drilling,” Opt. Express 18(19), 2039520400 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.020395
16.
16. D. G. Papazoglou, V. Papadakis, and D. Anglos, “ In situ interferometric depth and topography monitoring in LIBS elemental profiling of multi-layer structures,” J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 19, 483488 (2004).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b315657e
17.
17. P. J. L. Webster, J. X. Z. Yu, B. Y. C. Leung, M. D. Anderson, V. X. D. Yang, and M. James, “ In situ 24 kHz coherent imaging of morphology change in laser percussion drilling,” Opt. Express 35(5), 646648 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.35.000646
18.
18. P. J. L. Webster, L. G. Wright, K. D. Mortimer, B. Y. Leung, J. X. Z. Yu, and J. M. Fraser, “ Automatic real-time guidance of laser machining with inline coherent imaging,” J. Laser Appl. 23(2), 022001 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.2351/1.3567955
19.
19. B. Y. C. Leung, P. J. L. Webster, J. M. Fraser, and V. X. D. Yang, “ Real-time guidance of thermal and ultrashort pulsed laser ablation in hard tissue using inline coherent imaging,” Lasers Surg. Med. 44, 249256 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lsm.21162
20.
20. F. P. Mezzapesa, A. Ancona, T. Sibillano, F. De Lucia, M. Dabbicco, L. Maurizio, M. Pietro, and G. Scamarcio, “ High-resolution monitoring of the hole depth during ultrafast laser ablation drilling by diode laser self-mixing interferometry,” Opt. Lett. 36(6), 822824 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.36.000822
21.
21. F. P Mezzapesa, V. Spagnolo, A. Ancona, and G. Scamarcio, “ Detection of ultrafast laser ablation using quantum cascade laser-based sensing,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 171107 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4764115
22.
22. F. P. Mezzapesa, T. Sibillano, F. Di Niso, A. Ancona, P. Lugarà, M. Dabbicco, and G. Scamarcio, “ Real time ablation rate measurement during high aspect-ratio hole drilling with a 120-ps fiber laser,” Opt. Express 20(1), 663671 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.000663
23.
23. C. Dunsby and P. M. W. French, “ Techniques for depth-resolved imaging through turbid media including coherence-gated imaging,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 36(14), R207R227 (2003).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/36/14/201
24.
24. G. Giuliani, M. Norgia, S. Donati, and T. Bosch, “ Laser diode self-mixing technique for sensing applications,” J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 4(6), S283S294 (2002).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1464-4258/4/6/371
25.
25. H. Sun, Laser Diode Beam Basics, Manipulations and Characterizations ( Springer, New York, 2012).
26.
26. J. J. Chang, B. E. Warner, E. P. Dragon, and M. W. Martinez, “ Precision micromachining with pulsed green lasers,” J. Laser Appl. 10(6), 285291 (1998).
http://dx.doi.org/10.2351/1.521863
27.
27. L. Tunna, A. Kearns, W. O'Neill, and C. J. Sutcli, “ Micromachining of copper using Nd:YAG laser radiation at 1064, 532, and 355 nm wavelengths,” Opt. Laser Technol. 33, 135143 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0030-3992(00)00126-2
28.
28. M. R. H. Knowles, G. Rutterford, D. Karnakis, and A. Ferguson, “ Micro-machining of metals, ceramics and polymers using nanosecond lasers,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 33, 95102 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-0967-2
29.
29. T. V. Kononenko, S. V. Garnov, S. M. Pimenov, V. I. Konov, V. Romano, B. Borsos, and H. P. Weber, “ Laser ablation and micropatterning of thin TiN coatings,” Appl. Phys. A 71, 627631 (2000).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s003390000572
30.
30. A. G. Demir, B. Previtali, and N. Lecis, “ Development of laser dimpling strategies on TiN coatings for tribological applications with a highly energetic Q-switched fibre laser,” Opt. Laser Technol. 54, 5361 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2013.05.007
31.
31. Y. Zhou, W. Benxin, S. Tao, A. Forsman, and Y. Gao, “ Physical mechanism of silicon ablation with long nanosecond laser pulses at 1064 nm through time-resolved observation,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 257, 28862890 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.086
32.
32. J. Sun and J. P. Longtin, “ Inert gas beam delivery for ultrafast laser micromachining at ambient pressure,” J. Appl. Phys. 89(12), 82198224 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1372157
33.
33. G. Callies, P. Berger, and H. Huegel, “ Time-resolved observation of gas-dynamic discontinuities arising during excimer laser ablation and their interpretation,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 28, 794806 (1995).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/28/4/026
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/lia/journal/jla/27/S2/10.2351/1.4906478
Loading
/content/lia/journal/jla/27/S2/10.2351/1.4906478
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/lia/journal/jla/27/S2/10.2351/1.4906478
2015-02-26
2016-12-06

Abstract

Among possible monitoring techniques, self-mixing interferometry stands out as an appealing option for online ablation depth measurements. The method uses a simple laser diode, interference is detected inside the diode cavity and measured as the optical power fluctuation by the photodiode encased in the laser diode itself. This way, self-mixing interferometry combines the advantages of a high resolution point displacement measurement technique, with high compactness and easiness of operation. For a proper adaptation of self-mixing interferometry use in laser micromachining to monitor ablation depth, certain optical, electronical, and mechanical limitations need to be overcome. In laser surface texturing of thin ceramic coatings, the ablation depth control is critically important to avoid damage by substrate contamination. In this work, self-mixing interferometry was applied in the laser percussion drilling of TiN coatings. The ∼4 m thick TiN coatings were drilled with a 1 ns green fiber laser, while the self-mixing monitoring was applied with a 785 nm laser diode. The limitations regarding the presence of process plasma are discussed. The design criteria for the monitoring device are explained. Finally, the self-mixing measurements were compared to a conventional optical measurement device. The concept was validated as the measurements were statistically the same.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lia/journal/jla/27/S2/1.4906478.html;jsessionid=E0YC9puGwTnvrPpZSkiJsajG.x-aip-live-03?itemId=/content/lia/journal/jla/27/S2/10.2351/1.4906478&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/lia/journal/jla
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=Lia.aip.org/27/S2/10.2351/1.4906478&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/lia/journal/jla/27/S2/10.2351/1.4906478'
Right1,Right2,