Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/lia/journal/jla/28/2/10.2351/1.4943906
1.
1. J. F. Ready and D. F. Farson, LIA Handbook of Laser Materials Processing ( Springer, Berlin, 2001).
2.
2. F. Vollertsen, S. Grünenwald, M. Rethmeier, A. Gumenyuk, U. Reisgen, and S. Olschok, “ Welding thick steel plates with fibre lasers and GMAW,” Weld. World 54, R62R70 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03263489
3.
3. L. P. Jones, P. Aubert, V. Avilov, F. Coste, W. Daenner, T. Jokinen, K. R. Nightingale, and M. Wykes, “ Towards advanced welding methods for the ITER vacuum vessel sectors,” Fusion Eng. Des. 69, 215220 (2003).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0920-3796(03)00341-7
4.
4. V. Avilov, A. Gumenyuk, M. Lammers, and M. Rethmeier, “ PA position full penetration high power laser beam welding of up to 30 mm thick AlMg3 plates using electromagnetic weld pool support,” Sci. Technol. Weld. Joining 17, 128133 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/1362171811Y.0000000085
5.
5. M. Bachmann, V. Avilov, A. Gumenyuk, and M. Rethmeier, “ Numerical simulation of full-penetration laser beam welding of thick aluminium plates with inductive support,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 45, 035201 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/45/3/035201
6.
6. M. Bachmann, V. Avilov, A. Gumenyuk, and M. Rethmeier, “ numerical simulation of electromagnetic melt control systems in high power laser beam welding,” in Proceedings of the ICALEO 2013, 32nd International Congress on Applications of Lasers & Electro-Optics, Miami, USA (2013), pp. 5059.
7.
7. M. Bachmann, V. Avilov, A. Gumenyuk, and M. Rethmeier, “ Experimental and numerical investigation of an electromagnetic weld pool support system for high power laser beam welding of austenitic stainless steel,” J. Mater. Process. Technol. 214, 578591 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.11.013
8.
8. A. Backhouse, Welding of Austenitic & Duplex Stainless Steels—Overview ( Outokumpu Stainless, 2011); available at www.scottish-enterprise.com/~/media/se/resources/documents/wxyz/welding-of-austenitic-and-duplex-stainless-steels-overview-backhouse-outokumpu.pdf.
9.
9. D. C. Jiles and D. L. Atherton, “ Theory of ferromagnetic hysteresis,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 61, 4860 (1986).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(86)90066-1
10.
10. N. C. Pop and O. F. Caltun, “ Jiles-Atherton magnetic hysteresis parameters identification,” Acta Phys. Pol., A 120, 491496 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.120.491
11.
11. S. S. M. Tavares, M. R. Da Silva, and J. M. Neto, “ Magnetic property changes during embrittlement of a duplex stainless steel,” J. Alloy. Compd. 313, 168173 (2000).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8388(00)01062-8
12.
12.COMSOL Multiphysics, Modeling Hysteresis Effects, 2008.
13.
13. T. A. Palmer, J. W. Elmer, and S. S. Babu, “ Observations of ferrite/austenite transforma-tions in the heat affected zone of 2205 duplex stainless steel spot welds using time resolved X-ray diffraction,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A 374, 307321 (2004).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.03.037
14.
14. V. Avilov, A. Fritzsche, M. Bachmann, A. Gumenyuk, and M. Rethmeier, “ Full penetration laser beam welding of thick plates of duplex steel with electromagnetic weld pool support,” in Proceedings of the ICALEO 2015, 34th International Congress on Applications of Lasers and Electro-Optics, Atlanta, USA (2015).
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/lia/journal/jla/28/2/10.2351/1.4943906
Loading
/content/lia/journal/jla/28/2/10.2351/1.4943906
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/lia/journal/jla/28/2/10.2351/1.4943906
2016-03-31
2016-09-28

Abstract

An electromagnetic weld pool support system for 20 mm thick duplex stainless steel AISI 2205 was investigated numerically and compared to experiments. In our former publications, it was shown how an alternating current(AC)magnetic field below the process zone directed perpendicular to the welding direction can induce vertically directed Lorentz forces. These can counteract the gravitational forces and allow for a suppression of material drop-out for austenitic stainless steels and aluminum alloys. In this investigation, we additionally adopted a steady-state complex magnetic permeability model for the consideration of the magnetic hysteresis behavior due to the ferritic characteristics of the material. The model was calibrated against the Jiles–Atherton model. The material model was also successfully tested against an experimental configuration before welding with a 30 mm diameter cylinder of austenitic stainless steel surrounded by duplex stainless steel. Thereby, the effects of the Curie temperature on the magnetic characteristics in the vicinity of the later welding zone were simulated. The welding process was modeled with a three-dimensional turbulent steady-state model including heat transfer and fluid dynamics as well as the electromagnetic field equations. Main physical effects, the thermo-capillary (Marangoni) convection at the weld pool boundaries, the natural convection due to gravity as well as latent heat of solid–liquid phase transitions at the phase boundaries were accounted for in the model. The feedback of the electromagnetic forces on the weld pool was described in terms of the electromagnetic-induced pressure. The finite element software COMSOL Multiphysics 4.2 was used in this investigation. It is shown that the gravity drop-out associated with the welding of 20 mm thick duplex stainless steel plates due to the hydrostatic pressure can be prevented by the application of ACmagnetic fields between around 70 and 90 mT. The corresponding oscillation frequencies were between 1 and 10 kHz and the electromagnetic AC powers were between 1 and 2.3 kW. In the experiments, values of the electromagnetic AC power between 1.6 and 2.4 kW at oscillation frequencies between 1.2 and 2.5 kHz were found to be optimal to avoid melt sagging or drop-out of melt in single pass full-penetration laser beam welding of 15 and 20 mm thick AISI 2205.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lia/journal/jla/28/2/1.4943906.html;jsessionid=lidufroRjEbGdz8erRLghGji.x-aip-live-06?itemId=/content/lia/journal/jla/28/2/10.2351/1.4943906&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/lia/journal/jla
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=Lia.aip.org/28/2/10.2351/1.4943906&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/lia/journal/jla/28/2/10.2351/1.4943906'
Right1,Right2,