Effect of thermoreological complexity on the loss modulus vs for pPE. Master curve built from experimental data at (∙∙∙∙), (—), and (---).
MMDs of zPE (—), pPE (-•-), and mPE (--).
MMDs of zPE and fractions. Original sample (—), fraction F1 (•••), fraction F2 (---), MMD rebuilt from fractions (-•-). F1 and F2 fractions, respectively, represent 78 and of the total collected matter.
Storage moduli of zPE (엯엯), pPE (●●), mPE (◻◻), F1 (▴▴), and F2 (▵▵), at .
Loss moduli of zPE (엯엯), pPE (●●), mPE (◻◻), F1 (▴▴), and F2 (▵▵), at .
Activation energies spectra ( vs ) of zPE (●●), pPE (∗∗), mPE (◇◇), F1 (엯엯), and F2 (◻◻).
Zero-shear viscosity (for zPE and F1) or (for pPE, mPE, and F2) vs weight-average MM . The stars are the experimental data and the line represents Eq. (3) shifted to .
Experimental (엯엯엯) and predicted (—) dynamic moduli using the proposed method for (a) zPE, (b) pPE, (c) mPE, (d) F1, and (e) F2, at . Master curves have been used for zPE and F1.
Main characteristics of all investigated samples.
Horizontal flow activation energies for all investigated samples.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...