1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Viscoelasticity and crystallization of poly(ethylene oxide) star polymers of varying arm number and size
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1122/1.2751076
/content/sor/journal/jor2/51/5/10.1122/1.2751076
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/sor/journal/jor2/51/5/10.1122/1.2751076

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Evolution of the storage modulus (엯) and the loss modulus during an isothermal crystallization experiment for the sample PEO 16F9. The crossover of the moduli and signifies the crystallization transition. From bottom to top, the data correspond to different frequencies (see text): 36, 72, 140, and . The temperature variation from with different cooling rates is also shown with a solid curve in the figure (see text for details).

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Dynamic frequency sweeps of star PEO (a) and linear PEO (b) samples at . Filled symbols: storage modulus, . Empty symbols: loss modulus, . Lines with slopes 1 and 2 indicate the terminal scaling for and , respectively.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Zero-shear viscosity (normalized with the plateau modulus and the Rouse time for an entanglement) for linear and star PEOs at (symbols explained in the bottom right part), plotted against the number of entanglements per arm (a linear polymer is considered as having two arms). Literature data on 1,4-polybutadiene stars [Roovers (1985, 1991a); Toporowski and Roovers (1986); Pakula et al. (1998)] are also included for comparison (symbols in top left). Note that the data for the high-functionality PB stars ( and 128) correspond to the arm relaxation time, i.e., the earliest of the two terminal modes (the slower being the center-of-mass motion). The line through the data is the Milner-McLeish (1998) theory with a dilution exponent of .

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Normalized recoverable compliance (with the plateau modulus) for linear and star PEOs as function of the number of entanglements per arm (a linear polymer is considered as having two arms). For comparison, data on PBd stars [Roovers (1985, 1991a); Toporowski and Roovers (1986); Pakula et al. (1998)] are also presented. The solid line is the MM theory. The dotted lines are drawn to guide the eye. Inset: The extracted slope of plotted against the star functionality.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Hoffman–Weeks plot for linear and star PEOs from isothermal DSC experiments. The solid line has a slope of 1; the dashed line shows the approximate for sample 32F12.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Isothermal DSC curves of star PEO samples at (symbols in the figure). Inset: Avrami plot: Respective evolution of the relative degree of crystallinity (same symbols as in main figure). Solid lines are the fits to the data.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

(a) Half crystallization times for linear and star PEO samples. Empty symbols: DSC. Filled symbols: Rheology (the latter data are results of the parallel model). (b) Linear growth rates times zero-shear viscosities as functions of temperature (growth rates obtained from POM).

Tables

Generic image for table
TABLE I.

Molecular characteristics of the PEO samples used.

Generic image for table
TABLE II.

Ideal melting points determined from the Hoffman–Weeks plot (Fig. 5) and Avrami parameters for star PEO and linear PEO .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/sor/journal/jor2/51/5/10.1122/1.2751076
2007-09-01
2014-04-24
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Viscoelasticity and crystallization of poly(ethylene oxide) star polymers of varying arm number and size
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/sor/journal/jor2/51/5/10.1122/1.2751076
10.1122/1.2751076
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM