1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
A mesoscopic rheological model of polymer/layered silicate nanocomposites
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1122/1.2790461
/content/sor/journal/jor2/51/6/10.1122/1.2790461
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/sor/journal/jor2/51/6/10.1122/1.2790461
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Effect of the shear rate on the stress growth and relaxation of the material functions: (a) viscosity and (b) first normal stress coefficient.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Effect of the mobility coefficient of polymer on the stress growth and relaxation of the material functions: (a) viscosity and (b) first normal stress coefficient.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Effect of the mobility coefficient of plate on the stress growth and relaxation of the material functions: (a) viscosity and (b) first normal stress coefficient.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Effect of the interaction mobility coefficient on the stress growth and relaxation of the material functions: (a) viscosity and (b) first normal stress coefficient.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Effect of the nanoparticle weight fraction on the stress growth and relaxation of the material functions: (a) viscosity and (b) first normal stress coefficient.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Effect of the nanoparticle weight fraction on the steady shear flow material functions: (a) viscosity and (b) first normal stress coefficient.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Effect of the mobility tensor of plates, on the steady shear material functions: (a) viscosity and (b) first normal stress coefficient.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Effect of the parameter on the stress growth and relaxation viscosity.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Effect of the polymer-plate interaction on the stress growth and relaxation viscosity.

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Effect of the scaling parameter on the stress growth and relaxation viscosity.

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

Model predictions and comparison with experimental data in transient shear flow. Model parameters: , , , , , , , , , and clay. Data are taken from Wu et al. (2005).

Image of FIG. 12.
FIG. 12.

Model predictions and comparison with experimental data in transient shear flows. Model parameters: , , , , , , , , and . Data are taken from Ayyer and Leonov (2004).

Image of FIG. 13.
FIG. 13.

Model predictions and comparison with experimental data in steady shear flow. Model parameters:, , , , , , , and . Data are taken from Krishnamoorti et al. (2001).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/sor/journal/jor2/51/6/10.1122/1.2790461
2007-11-01
2014-04-23
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: A mesoscopic rheological model of polymer/layered silicate nanocomposites
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/sor/journal/jor2/51/6/10.1122/1.2790461
10.1122/1.2790461
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM