American Journal of Physics
multicolored wave spectrumblack and yellow corner piece


Previous Article
Student understanding of induced current: Using tutorials in introductory physics to teach electricity and magnetism
Previous research indicates significant improvement in student conceptual understanding of physics topics after instruction with Tutorials in Introductory Physics at the University of Washington, Seat...
Next Article
Sequential measurements and the commutator

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Interpreting FCI scores: Normalized gain, preinstruction scores, and scientific reasoning ability

American Journal of Physics -- December 2005 -- Volume 73, Issue 12, pp. 1172-1182

Issue Date: December 2005
Buy This PDF   (US$21)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (363 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 01.50.-i
    Educational aids
  • 45.05.+x
    General theory of classical mechanics of discrete systems
  • YEAR: 2005

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0002-9505 (print)  
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AAPT
Vincent P. Coletta and Jeffrey A. Phillips
Department of Physics, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, California 90045
We examined normalized gains and preinstruction scores on the force concept inventory (FCI) for students in interactive engagement courses in introductory mechanics at four universities and found a significant, positive correlation for three of them. We also examined class average FCI scores of 2948 students in 38 interactive engagement classes, 31 of which were from the same four universities and 7 of which came from 3 other schools. We found a significant, positive correlation between class average normalized FCI gains and class average preinstruction scores. To probe this correlation, we administered Lawson's classroom test of scientific reasoning to 65 students and found a significant, positive correlation between these students' normalized FCI gains and their Lawson test scores. This correlation is even stronger than the correlation between FCI gains and preinstruction FCI scores. Our study demonstrates that differences in student populations are important when comparing normalized gains in different interactive engagement classes. We suggest using the Lawson test along with the FCI to measure the effectiveness of alternative interactive engagement strategies.

©2005 American Association of Physics Teachers
History: Received 2 April 2004; accepted 9 September 2005
Permalink: http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.2117109

REFERENCES (26)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.