Previous Article
Maxentropic Continuous Distributions Based on the Mean and Range
In many practical situations it is common to have information about the values of the mean and range of certain population. In these cases it is important to specify the population distribution from t...
Next Article
Algorithm for Minimum Laterally-Adiabatically Reduced Fisher Information
The paper observes that consistent lateral motion of probability within a probability density does not affect the Shannon entropy, i.e. that such movement of probability is an adiabatic or entropy-pre...

Maximum Entropy Approximation

AIP Conf. Proc. -- November 23, 2005 -- Volume 803, pp. 337-344
BAYESIAN INFERENCE AND MAXIMUM ENTROPY METHODS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING: 25th International Workshop on Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering; doi:10.1063/1.2149812

Issue Date: 23 November 2005

You are not logged in. Log in

N. Sukumar
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, One Shields Avenue, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
In this paper, the construction of scattered data approximants is studied using the principle of maximum entropy. For under-determined and ill-posed problems, Jaynes's principle of maximum information-theoretic entropy is a means for least-biased statistical inference when insufficient information is available. Consider a set of distinct nodes {xi}<sub>i = 1</sub><sup>n</sup> in Rd, and a point p with coordinate x that is located within the convex hull of the set {xi}. The convex approximation of a function u(x) is written as: uh(x) = Sigma<sub>i = 1</sub><sup>n</sup> phii(x)ui, where {phii}<sub>i = 1</sub><sup>n</sup> >= 0 are known as shape functions, and uh must reproduce affine functions (d = 2): Sigma<sub>i = 1</sub><sup>n</sup> phii = 1, Sigma<sub>i = 1</sub><sup>n</sup> phiixi = x, Sigma<sub>i = 1</sub><sup>n</sup> phiiyi = y. We view the shape functions as a discrete probability distribution, and the linear constraints as the expectation of a linear function. For n > 3, the problem is under-determined. To obtain a unique solution, we compute phii by maximizing the uncertainty H(phi) = – Sigma<sub>i = 1</sub><sup>n</sup> phii log phii, subject to the above three constraints. In this approach, only the nodal coordinates are used, and neither the nodal connectivity nor any user-defined parameters are required to determine phii—the defining characteristics of a mesh-free Galerkin approximant. Numerical results for {phii}<sub>i = 1</sub><sup>n</sup> are obtained using a convex minimization algorithm, and shape function plots are presented for different nodal configurations. ©2005 American Institute of Physics
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$28)
Download PDF (310 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 02.30.Mv
    Approximations and expansions
  • 89.70.+c
    Information theory and communication theory
  • 02.50.Tt
    Inference methods
  • YEAR: 2005

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0094-243X (print)  
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

There are no references.

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.