Electronic analog of the electro-optic modulator
Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 665 (1990); doi:10.1063/1.102730
Issue Date: 12 February 1990
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
We propose an electron wave analog of the electro-optic light modulator. The current modulation in the proposed structure arises from spin precession due to the spin-orbit coupling in narrow-gap semiconductors, while magnetized contacts are used to preferentially inject and detect specific spin orientations. This structure may exhibit significant current modulation despite multiple modes, elevated temperatures, or a large applied bias.
Applied Physics Letters is copyrighted by The American Institute of Physics.
| History: | Received 3 October 1989; accepted 5 December 1989 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?APPLAB/56/665/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
OPTICAL MODULATION,
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES,
OPTICAL MODULATORS,
DESIGN,
ELECTRO&minus,
OPTICAL EFFECTS,
POLARIZATION
- 85.30.Tv
Electrical and magnetic devices Semiconductor devices Field effect devices - 42.80.Ks
Optics Optical devices, techniques, and applications Optical beam modulators, choppers - 73.40.Kp
Electronic structure and electrical properties of surfaces, interfaces, and thin films Electronic transport in interface structures III
V semiconductor-to-semiconductor contacts, p
n junctions, and heterojunctions
- 71.70.Ej
Electron states Level splitting and interactions Spin
orbit coupling, Zeeman, Stark, and strain splitting
- YEAR: 1990
RELATED DATABASES
PUBLICATION DATA
0003-6951 (print)
1077-3118 (online)
REFERENCES (12)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- See, for example, G. Timp, H. U. Baranger, P. deVegvar, J. E. Cunningham, R. E. Howard, R. Behringer, and P. M. Mankiewich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2081 (1988).
- F. Sols, M. Macucci, U. Ravaioli, and K. Hess, Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 350 (1989);
- S. Datta,
Superlatt. Microstruct. 6, 83 (1989 );
D. C. Miller, R. Lake, S. Datta, M. S. Lundstrom, M. R. Melloch, and R. Reifenberger, in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Nanostructure Physics and Fabrication, College Station, Texas, March 13–15, 1989, edited by M. A. Reed and W. P. Kirk (Academic, New York, 1989), p. 165. - M. Johnson and R. H. Silsbee, Phys. Rev. B 37, 5312 (1988).
- R. Meservey, D. Paraskevopoulos, and P. M. Tedrow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 858 (1976).
- G. Lommer, F. Malcher, and U. Rössler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 728 (1988).
- Y. A. Bychkov and E. I. Rashba,
J. Phys. C 17, 6039 (1984 );
also Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Physics and Semiconductors, San Francisco, Aug. 6–10, 1984 (Springer, New York, 1984), p. 321. - J. Luo, H. Munekata, F. F. Fang, and P. J. Stiles, Phys. Rev. B 38, 10142 (1988).
- B. Das, D. C. Miller, S. Datta, R. Reifenberger, W. P. Hong, P. K. Bhattacharya, J. Singh, and M. Jaffe, Phys. Rev. B 39, 1411 (1989).
- B. Das, S. Datta, and R. Reifenberger (unpublished).
- C. J. B. Ford, T. J. Thornton, R. Newbury, M. Pepper, H. Ahmed, D. C. Peacock, D. A. Ritchie, J. E. F. Frost, and G. A. C. Jones, Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 21 (1989).
- G. Bergmann,
Solid State Commun. 42, 815 (1982 ).







