Applied Physics Letters
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Enhanced photogeneration of carriers in a semiconductor via coupling across a nonisothermal nanoscale vacuum gap
Enhanced generation of carriers when a thermophotovoltaic cell is placed in submicron proximity to a heated surface is demonstrated using custom-designed InAs photodiodes and special silicon-based hea...
Next Article
Investigation of spurious velocity overshoot using Monte Carlo data
For the simulation of state-of-the-art devices, hydrodynamic and energy transport models account for nonlocal effects. Although these models have been available for several decades, there are still un...

Scanning probe electromagnetic tweezers

Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 1897 (2001); doi:10.1063/1.1402963

Issue Date: 17 September 2001

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Mladen Barbic, Jack J. Mock, Andrew P. Gray, and S. Schultz
Department of Physics, University of California–San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0319
We present a micromanipulation technique that utilizes integrated microcoils and magnetic microtips for localized positioning of micron-sized magnetic objects. Forces of 10 pN, and submicron positioning control are demonstrated on the 2.8 µm diameter superparamagnetic beads. The technique also implements an optical illumination scheme that provides a clear viewing of the magnetically trapped objects without including the scattering background from the magnetic manipulator tip. This simple instrument provides a noninvasive, low cost alternative to the optical trapping techniques normally used in micromanipulation. Among the possible advantages are the negligible heating of the manipulated sample, effective decoupling of the manipulation component of the experiment from the optical studies of the systems of interest, and the ability to perform studies in a variety of fluids. ©2001 American Institute of Physics.
History: Received 26 March 2001; accepted 16 July 2001
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?APPLAB/79/1897/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (271 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 06.60.Sx
    Metrology, measurements, and laboratory procedures Laboratory procedures Positioning and alignment; manipulating, remote handling
  • 81.16.Ta
    Materials science Methods of nanofabrication and processing Atom manipulation
  • 75.50.Tt
    Magnetic properties and materials Studies of specific magnetic materials Fine-particle systems; nanocrystalline materials
  • 07.79.-v
    Instruments, apparatus, and components common to several branches of physics and astronomy Scanning probe microscopes and components
  • YEAR: 2001

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0003-6951 (print)   1077-3118 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (29)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. G. Bennig, H. Rohrer, C. Gerber, and E. Weibel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 120 (1983).
  2. G. Benning, C. F. Quate, and C. Gerber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 930 (1986).
  3. D. M. Eigler and E. K. Schweizer, Nature (London) 344, 524 (1990).
  4. A. Ashkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 156 (1970).
  5. A. Ashkin and J. M. Dziedzic, Science 235, 1517 (1987).
  6. P. Kim and C. M. Lieber, Science 286, 2148 (1999).
  7. F. H. C. Crick and A. F. W. Hughes, Exp. Cell Res. 1, 37 (1950).
  8. P. A. Valberg, Science 224, 513 (1984).
  9. N. Wang, J. P. Butler, and D. E. Ingber, Science 260, 1124 (1993).
  10. S. B. Smith, L. Finzi, and C. Bustamante, Science 258, 1122 (1992).
  11. D. Wirtz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2436 (1995).
  12. F. Ziemann, J. Radler, and E. Sackmann, Biophys. J. 66, 2210 (1994).
  13. F. Amblard, B. Yurke, A. Pargellis, and S. Leibler, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 67, 818 (1996).
  14. Magnet wire and nickel alloy 120 soft-ferromagnetic wire are available from the California Fine Wire Company, Grover Beach, California.
  15. G. Mollenstedt and W. Bayh, Phys. Bl. 18, 299 (1962).
  16. R. W. DeBlois, J. Appl. Phys. 29, 459 (1958).
  17. J. Sanny and W. G. Clark, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 52, 539 (1981).
  18. H. Mahdjour, W. G. Clark, and K. Baberschke, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 57, 1100 (1986).
  19. D. L. Olson, T. L. Peck, A. G. Webb, R. L. Magin, and J. V. Sweedler, Science 270, 1967 (1995).
  20. J. A. Rogers, R. J. Jackman, G. M. Whitesides, D. L. Olson, and J. V. Sweedler, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 2464 (1997).
  21. M. Todorovic and S. Schultz, Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 3595 (1998).
  22. D. Rugar, H. J. Mamin, P. Guethner, S. E. Lambert, J. E. Stern, I. McFadyen, and T. Yogi, J. Appl. Phys. 68, 1169 (1990).
  23. J. A. Sidles, J. L. Garbini, K. J. Bruland, D. Rugar, O. Zuger, S. Hoen, and C. S. Yannoni, Rev. Mod. Phys. 67, 249 (1995).
  24. J. Joung, J. Shen, and P. Grodzinski, IEEE Trans. Magn. 36, 2012 (2000).
  25. F. H. C. Crick, Exp. Cell Res. 1, 505 (1950).
  26. Dynal, Inc., Lake Success, New York.
  27. D. G. Streblechenko, M. R. Scheinfein, M. Mankos, and K. Babcock, IEEE Trans. Magn. 32, 4124 (1996).
  28. A. Thiaville, L. Belliard, D. Majer, E. Zeldov, and J. Miltat, J. Appl. Phys. 82, 3182 (1997).
  29. G. T. Gillies, R. C. Ritter, W. C. Broaddus, M. S. Grady, M. A. Howard III, and R. G. McNeil, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 65, 533 (1994).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.