Epitaxial growth and magnetic properties of EuO on (001) Si by molecular-beam epitaxy
Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 975 (2003); doi:10.1063/1.1593832
Issue Date: 4 August 2003
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
Epitaxial (001) EuO thin films have been grown on (001) Si utilizing an intermediate, epitaxial SrO buffer layer by molecular-beam epitaxy. Four-circle x-ray diffraction reveals nearly phase-pure samples. Magnetic measurements indicate that the EuO layer is ferromagnetic, with a transition temperature (68 K) close to the bulk value and a saturation magnetic moment of 4.7 Bohr magnetons per Eu atom. The magneto-optic Kerr effect observed is also comparable to bulk EuO. Such heterostructures have potential as a means to inject spin-polarized electrons into silicon for use in spintronics applications. ©2003 American Institute of Physics.
| History: | Received 27 November 2002; accepted 21 May 2003 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?APPLAB/83/975/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
europium compounds,
magnetic semiconductors,
magnetic epitaxial layers,
spin polarised transport,
magnetoelectronics,
molecular beam epitaxial growth,
X-ray diffraction,
ferromagnetic materials,
Kerr magneto-optical effect,
reflection high energy electron diffraction
- 75.50.Pp
Magnetic semiconductors - 75.70.Ak
Magnetic properties of monolayers and thin films - 81.15.Hi
Molecular, atomic, ion, and chemical beam epitaxy - 72.25.Dc
Spin polarized transport in semiconductors - 72.25.Hg
Electrical injection of spin polarized carriers - 68.55.Nq
Thin film composition and phase identification - 75.50.Dd
Nonmetallic ferromagnetic materials - 78.20.Ls
Magnetooptical effects (bulk materials/thin films) - 81.05.Hd
Other semiconductors: fabrication, treatment, testing and analysis excluding elemental, IIVI, IIIV and amorphous semiconductors - YEAR: 2003
RELATED DATABASES
PUBLICATION DATA
0003-6951 (print)
1077-3118 (online)
REFERENCES (31)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- Y. Ohno, D. K. Young, B. Beschoten, F. Matsukura, H. Ohno, and D. D. Awschalom,
Nature (London) 402, 790 (1999) . - R. Fierderling, M. Keim, G. Reushcer, W. Ossau, G. Schmidt, A. Waag, and L. Molenkamp,
Nature (London) 402, 787 (1999) . - P. R. Hammar, B. R. Bennett, M. J. Yang, and M. Johnson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 203 (1999).
- S. Gardelis, C. G. Smith, C. H. W. Barnes, E. H. Linfield, and D. A. Ritchie, Phys. Rev. B 60, 7764 (1999).
- A. T. Hanbicki, B. T. Jonker, G. Itskos, G. Kioseoglou, and A. Petrou, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 1240 (2002).
- D. K. Young, E. Johnson-Halperin, D. D. Awschalom, Y. Ohno, and H. Ohno, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 1598 (2002).
- Although the achievement of epitaxial growth of EuS on silicon by Ref. 8 predates the era of spintronics, structures based on such epitaxy could be relevant for spin injection.
- B. Saftic', N. R
ula, W. Zinn, and J. Chevallier,
J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 28, 305 (1982) . - J. P. Gordon and K. D. Bowers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 368 (1958).
- B. T. Matthias, R. M. Bozorth, and J. H. Van Vleck,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 160 (1961) . - T. R. McGuire and M. W. Shafer, J. Appl. Phys. 35, 984 (1964).
- K. J. Hubbard and D. G. Schlom,
J. Mater. Res. 11, 2757 (1996) . - M. R. Oliver, J. O. Dimmock, A. L. McWhorter, and T. B. Reed,
Phys. Rev. B 5, 1078 (1972) . - Y. Shapira, S. Foner, and T. B. Reed,
Phys. Rev. B 8, 2299 (1973) . - K. Y. Ahn and J. C. Suits,
IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG-3, 453 (1967) . - P. G. Steeneken, L. H. Tjeng, I. Elfimov, G. A. Sawatsky, G. Ghiringhelli, N. B. Brookes, and D.-J. Huang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 047201 (2002).
- K. Lee and J. C. Suits, J. Appl. Phys. 41, 954 (1970).
- G. M. Roesler, Jr., M. E. Filipkowski, P. R. Broussard, Y. U. Idzerda, M. S. Osofsky, and R. J. Soulen, Jr., in Superconducting Superlattices and Multilayers, edited by I. Bozovic (SPIE, Bellingham, 1994), Vol. 2157, pp. 285290.
- N. Iwata, G. Pindoria, T. Morishita, and K. Kohn,
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 69, 230 (2000) . - Y. Kado and Y. Arita, J. Appl. Phys. 61, 2398 (1987).
- R. A. McKee, F. J. Walker, and M. F. Chisholm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3014 (1999).
- J. Lettieri, J. H. Haeni, and D. G. Schlom,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 20, 1332 (2002) . - One ML is defined as the concentration of atoms on the (001) surface of silicon, that is 6.78×1014 atoms/cm2. Regardless of the structure formed (rock salt or silicide) and its state of relaxation, 1 ML of Eu (or Sr or Ba) is taken to contain 6.78×1014 Eu (or Sr or Ba) atoms/cm2.
-
ML deposited at ~700 °C, see Ref. 22 for details on silicide formation.
- J. Evers, G. Oehlinger, and A. Weiss,
J. Solid State Chem. 20, 173 (1977) . - S. Yadavalli, M. H. Yang, and C. P. Flynn, Phys. Rev. B 41, 7961 (1990).
- EuO was demonstrated to grow epitaxially at ~300 °C in Refs. 17,18,19.
- V. Vaithyanathan, J. Lettieri, and D. G. Schlom (unpublished).
- These oxides all have the rock-salt structure. At room temperature, EuO has a lattice constant of 5.1426 Å, SrO has a lattice constant of 5.1601 Å, and BaO has a lattice constant of 5.5391 Å (Ref. 30).
- Landolt-Bornstein: Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, edited by K.-H. Hellwege and A. M. Hellwege, New Series, Group III (Springer, Berlin, 1975), Vol. 7, Part b1, pp. 33, 34, 111; (Springer, Berlin, 1982), Vol. 17, Part b, p. 27.
- G. J. McCarthy and W. B. White,
J. Less-Common Met. 22, 409 (1970) .







