Low-temperature, in situ tunable, uniaxial stress measurements in semiconductors using a piezoelectric actuator
Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 5235 (2003); doi:10.1063/1.1635963
Issue Date: 22 December 2003
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
We demonstrate the use of a piezoelectric actuator to apply, at low temperatures, uniaxial stress in the plane of a two-dimensional electron system confined to a modulation-doped AlAs quantum well. Via the application of stress, which can be tuned in situ and continuously, we control the energies and occupations of the conduction-band minima and the electronic properties of the electron system. We also report measurements of the longitudinal and transverse strain versus bias for the actuator at 300, 77, and 4.2 K. A pronounced hysteresis is observed at 300 and 77 K, while at 4.2 K, strain is nearly linear and shows very little hysteresis with the applied bias. ©2003 American Institute of Physics.
| History: | Received 28 April 2003; accepted 30 October 2003 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?APPLAB/83/5235/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
aluminium compounds,
III-V semiconductors,
piezoelectric actuators,
stress measurement,
semiconductor quantum wells,
conduction bands
- 68.60.Bs
Mechanical and acoustical properties of thin films - 68.65.Fg
Quantum wells (structure and nonelectronic properties) - 81.05.Ea
IIIV semiconductors: fabrication, treatment, testing and analysis - 85.50.-n
Dielectric, ferroelectric, and piezoelectric devices - 81.07.St
Quantum wells: fabrication and characterization - YEAR: 2003
RELATED DATABASES
PUBLICATION DATA
0003-6951 (print)
1077-3118 (online)
REFERENCES (16)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- For stress-induced valley splitting in Si-metaloxidesemiconductor field effect transistor 2D electrons, see G. Dorda, J. Appl. Phys. 42, 2053 (1971);
- For previous reports of displacement/bias for piezoelectric tubes in the 4 to 300 K temperature range, see K. G. Vandervoort, R. K. Zasadzinski, G. G. Galicia, and G. W. Crabtree, Rev. Sci. Instrum.64, 896 (1993);
- Part No. PSt 150/5×5×7, from Piezomechanik, Munich, Germany.
- We used two types of strain gauges: (1) "Advance" (Ni 45%, Cu 55%), part No. SG-2/350-LY11, from Omega Engineering, and (2) "Karma" (Ni 74%, Cr 20%, Al 3%, Fe 3%), part No. WK-06-062TT-350, from Vishay Micromeasurements Group. For each type, the resistance change of the gauge
R/R, divided by its sensitivity factor, gives the strain defined as
L/L, where L is the length along the direction of the gauge axis. The Karma gauges have the advantage that corrections to their sensitivity factor, due to changes in temperature and transverse strain, are smaller and better known. Such corrections can be up to 20% (for the Advance gauges at low temperatures), and have been included in the strain data reported here. - Part No. 45640 "plus endfest 300", from UHU, Buehl, Germany. We cured the epoxy at 80 °C for 60 min.
- We also have data at 0.30 K and 0.03 K; these are similar to the 4.2 K data to within our experimental resolution.
- See, e.g., R. C. Barrett and C. F. Quate, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 62, 1393 (1991).
- A similarly large ratio (~3) was also reported at 50 K for (Ba,Sr)TiO3 ceramics by
- The use of piezo materials for applying a small ac stress to a semiconductor crystal to modulate its optical properties was reported in
- Data of Figs. 1 and 2 were taken on two different piezo rods with slightly different strain versus bias characteristics.
- Using the results of P. Lefebvre, B. Gil, H. Mathieu, and R. Planel, Phys. Rev. B 40, 7802 (1989),
- E. P. De Poortere, Y. P. Shkolnikov, E. Tutuc, S. J. Papadakis, and M. Shayegan, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 1583 (2002).
- K. Maezawa, T. Mizutani, and S. Yamada, J. Appl. Phys. 71, 296 (1992).
- Y. P. Shkolnikov, K. Vakili, E. P. De Poortere, M. Shayegan, and K. Karrai (unpublished).
- AlAs 2D electrons exhibit a nearly linear enhancement of valley splitting with B
- F. F. Fang and P. J. Stiles,
Phys. Rev. 174, 823 (1968) .
D. S. Paik, S. E. Park, T. R. Shrout, and W. Hackenberger,
x=210 bar and
y=23 bar in our experiments.This enhancement is ignored in the schematic energy level diagram shown in Fig. 4(b).







