Applied Physics Letters
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Nitrogen bonding, stability, and transport in AlON films on Si
The chemical environment of N in nitrided aluminum oxide films on Si(001) was investigated by angle-resolved x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Two different bonding configurations were identified, nam...
Next Article
Short-range structure of Zr41Ti14Cu12.5Ni10Be22.5 glass prepared by shock wave
Short-range structure of a Zr41Ti14Cu12.5Ni10Be22.5 bulk metallic glass prepared by shock-wave treatment was investigated by x-ray diffraction using synchrotron radiation with a wavelength of 0.112 71...

X-ray studies of the growth of smooth Ag films on Ge(111)-c(2×8)

Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 4995 (2004); doi:10.1063/1.1763212

Published 28 May 2004

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

L. Basile
Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 1110 West Green Street, Urbana, Illinois 61801-3080
Frederick Seitz Materials Research Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 104 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, Illinois 61801-2902


Hawoong Hong
Frederick Seitz Materials Research Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 104 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, Illinois 61801-2902

P. Czoschke and T.-C. Chiang
Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 1110 West Green Street, Urbana, Illinois 61801-3080
Frederick Seitz Materials Research Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 104 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, Illinois 61801-2902

We have performed in situ reflectivity measurements using synchrotron radiation of Ag films deposited on Ge(111) over the thickness range of 3–12 atomic layers. The films deposited at a substrate temperature of 110 K are not well ordered, but become well ordered upon annealing, as evidenced by substantial changes in the x-ray reflectivity data. The thickness distribution for each annealed film, deduced from a fit to the reflectivity data, is remarkably narrow, with just two or three adjacent discrete thicknesses present, despite the large lattice mismatch between Ag and Ge. In some cases, the film thickness is nearly atomically uniform. The results are discussed in connection with recent models and theories of electronic effects on the growth of ultrathin metal films. ©2004 American Institute of Physics.
History: Received 1 March 2004; accepted 27 April 2004; published 28 May 2004
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?APPLAB/84/4995/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$28)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (52 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 68.55.Jk
    Thin film structure and morphology; thickness; crystalline orientation and texture
  • 81.15.Ef
    Vacuum deposition
  • 81.40.Gh
    Other heat and thermomechanical treatments
  • 68.49.Uv
    X-ray standing waves (surface characterization)
  • 68.35.Bs
    Structure of clean solid surfaces (reconstruction)
  • YEAR: 2004

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0003-6951 (print)   1077-3118 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (13)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. J.J. Paggel, T. Miller, and T.-C. Chiang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5632 (1998);
  2. D.-A. Luh, T. Miller, J.J. Paggel, M.Y. Chou, and T.-C. Chiang, Science 292, 1131 (2001).
  3. A.R. Smith, K.-J. Chao, Q. Niu, and C.K. Shih, Science 273, 226 (1996);
  4. L. Huang, S. Jay Chey, and J.H. Weaver, Surf. Sci. 416, L1101 (1998).
  5. L. Gavioli, K.R. Kimberlin, M.C. Tringides, J.F. Wendelken, and Z. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 129 (1999).
  6. K. Budde, E. Abram, V. Yeh, and M.C. Tringides, Phys. Rev. B 61, R10602 (2000);
  7. V. Yeh, L. Berbil-Bautista, C.Z. Wang, K.M. Ho, and M.C. Tringides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5158 (2000);
    M. Hupalo, S. Kremmer, V. Yeh, L. Berbil-Bautista, E. Abram, and M.C. Tringides, Surf. Sci. 493, 526 (2001);
    M. Hupalo, V. Yeh, L. Berbil-Bautista, S. Kremmer, E. Abram, and M.C. Tringides, Phys. Rev. B 64, 155307 (2001).
  8. H. Hong, C.-M. Wei, M.Y. Chou, Z. Wu, L. Basile, H. Chen, M. Holt, and T.-C. Chiang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 076104 (2003).
  9. A. Crotini, D. Cvetko, L. FLoreano, R. Gotter, A. Morgante, and F. Tomasini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1527 (1997);
  10. L. Floreano, D. Cvetko, F. Bruno, G. Bavdek, A. Cossaro, R. Gotter, A. Verdini, and A. Morgante, Prog. Surf. Sci. 72, 135 (2003).
  11. Z. Zhang, Q. Niu, and C.-K. Shih, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5381 (1998);
  12. Z. Suo and Z. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 58, 5116 (1998).
  13. C.M. Wei and M.Y. Chou, Phys. Rev. B 66, 233408 (2002);
  14. 68, 125406 (2003).
  15. P. Czoschke, H. Hong, L. Basile, and T.-C. Chiang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 226801 (2003).
  16. R. G. van Silfhout, J.F. van der Veen, C. Norris, and J.E. Macdonald, Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 89, 169 (1990).
  17. I.K. Robinson and D.J. Tweet, Rep. Prog. Phys. 55, 599 (1992).
  18. R. Feidenhans'l, Surf. Sci. Rep. 10, 105 (1989).
  19. J. Als-Nielsen and D. McMorrow, Elements of Modern X-Ray Physics (Wiley, New York, 2001).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.