Electrical spin pumping of quantum dots at room temperature
Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 132503 (2005); doi:10.1063/1.1890469
Published 22 March 2005
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
We report on electrical control of the spin polarization of InAs/GaAs self-assembled quantum dots (QDs) at room temperature. This is achieved by electrical injection of spin-polarized electrons from an Fe Schottky contact. The circular polarization of the QD electroluminescence shows that a 5% electron spin polarization is obtained in the InAs QDs at 300 K, which is remarkably insensitive to temperature. This is attributed to suppression of the spin-relaxation mechanisms in the QDs due to reduced dimensionality. These results demonstrate that practical regimes of spin-based operation are clearly attainable in solid-state semiconductor devices.
©2005 American Institute of Physics
| History: | Received 17 November 2004; accepted 7 February 2005; published 22 March 2005 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?APPLAB/86/132503/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
indium compounds,
gallium arsenide,
III-V semiconductors,
semiconductor quantum dots,
spin polarised transport,
Schottky barriers,
electroluminescence,
charge injection
- 73.63.Kv
Quantum dots (electronic transport) - 72.25.Dc
Spin polarized transport in semiconductors - 78.60.Fi
Electroluminescence (condensed matter) - 72.25.Mk
Spin transport through interfaces - 72.25.Rb
Spin relaxation and scattering (spin polarized transport) - 72.25.Hg
Electrical injection of spin polarized carriers - 72.25.Pn
Current-driven spin pumping - 78.67.Hc
Optical properties of quantum dots - 73.30.+y
Surface double layers, Schottky barriers, and work functions - YEAR: 2005
RELATED DATABASES
PUBLICATION DATA
0003-6951 (print)
1077-3118 (online)
REFERENCES (24)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- M. Guzzi, S. Sanguinetti, and M. Gurioli, in Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, edited by H. S. Nalwa (American Scientific, Stevenson Ranch, CA, 2004), Vol. 9, p. 735.
- D. Gammon and D. G. Steel, Phys. Today 55, 36 (2002).
- M. Paillard, X. Marie, P. Renucci, T. Amand, A. Jbeli, and J. M. Gerard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1634 (2001).
- D. Gammon, E. S. Snow, B. V. Shanabrook, D. S. Katzer, and D. Park,
Science 273, 87 (1996) . - A. V. Khaetskii and Yu. V. Nazarov,
Physica E (Amsterdam) 6, 470 (2000) . - S. Ghosh and P. Bhattacharya, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 658 (2002). Note that in the measurement geometry used, the hole spin and photon momentum are orthogonal. Therefore, attributing the circular polarization of the surface-emitted electroluminescence to injection and recombination of spin-polarized holes violates conservation of angular momentum, suggesting that other mechanisms contribute to the optical polarization measured.
- Y. Chye, M. E. White, E. Johnston-Halperin, B. D. Gerardot, D. D. Awschalom, and P. M. Petroff, Phys. Rev. B 66, 201301(R) (2002).
- J. Seufert, G. Bacher, H. Schomig, A. Forchel, L. Hansen, G. Schmidt, and L. W. Molenkamp, Phys. Rev. B 69, 35311 (2004).
- B. T. Jonker, Y. D. Park, B. R. Bennett, H. D. Cheong, G. Kioseoglou, and A. Petrou, Phys. Rev. B 62, 8180 (2000).
- A. T. Hanbicki, B. T. Jonker, G. Itskos, G. Kioseoglou, and A. Petrou, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 1240 (2002).
- A. T. Hanbicki, O. M. J. van 't Erve, R. Magno, G. Kioseoglou, C. H. Li, B. T. Jonker, R. Mallory, M. Yasar, and A. Petrou, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 4092 (2003).
- Z. R. Wasilewski, S. Fafard, and J. P. McCaffrey,
J. Cryst. Growth 201/202, 1131 (1999) . - M. E. Ware, A. Bracker, D. Gammon, and D. Gershoni, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 789, 137 (2004).
- F. Meier and B.P. Zakharchenya, Optical Orientation (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984), Vol. 8.
- C. E. Pryor and M. E. Flatté, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 257901 (2003).
- S. Sanguinetti, M. Henini, M. Grassi Alessi, M. Capizzi, P. Frigeri, and S. Franchi, Phys. Rev. B 60, 8267 (1999).
- R. Meservey and P. M. Tedrow,
Phys. Rep. 238, 173 (1994) . - O. M. J. van 't Erve, G. Kioseoglou, A. T. Hanbicki, C. H. Li, B. T. Jonker, R. Mallory, M. Yasar, and A. Petrou, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 4334 (2004).
- C. H. Li, G. Kioseoglou, O. M. J. van 't Erve, A. T. Hanbicki, B. T. Jonker, R. Mallory, M. Yasar, and A. Petrou, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 1544 (2004).
- P. H. Song and K. W. Kim, Phys. Rev. B 66, 35207 (2002).
- A. Malinowski, R. S. Britton, T. Grevatt, R. T. Harley, D. A. Ritchie, and M. Y. Simmons, Phys. Rev. B 62, 13034 (2000).
- V. I. Puller, L. G. Mourokh, N. J. M. Horing, and A. Y. Smirnov, Phys. Rev. B 67, 155309 (2003).
- J. M. Kikkawa and D. D. Awschalom, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4313 (1998).
- R. M. Stroud, A. T. Hanbicki, Y. D. Park, G. Kioseoglou, A. G. Petukhov, B. T. Jonker, G. Itskos, and A. Petrou, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 166602 (2002).







