Applied Physics Letters
Feedback | Help | Exit
Applied Physics Letters
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Influence of composition diffusion on the band structures of InGaNAs/GaAs quantum wells investigated by the band-anticrossing model
We investigate the influence of quantum-well intermixing (QWI) on the electronic band structure of GaInNAs/GaAs multiquantum wells. The band structures and optical transitions have been calculated bas...
Next Article
Optical properties of self-organized wurtzite InN/GaN quantum dots: A combined atomistic tight-binding and full configuration interaction calculation
In this work, we investigate the electronic and optical properties of self-assembled InN/GaN quantum dots. The one-particle states of the low-dimensional heterostructures are provided by a tight-bindi...

Optimizing the superlens: Manipulating geometry to enhance the resolution

Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 231113 (2005); doi:10.1063/1.2139620

Published 30 November 2005

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Viktor A. Podolskiy and Nicholas A. Kuhta
Physics Department, 301 Weniger Hall, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331

Graeme W. Milton
Department of Mathematics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112
We analyze the performance of a planar lens based on realistic negative index material in a generalized geometry. We demonstrate that the conventional superlens design (where the lens is centered between the object and the image) is not optimal from the resolution point of view, develop an analytical expression for the resolution limit of a generalized lens, use it to find the optimum lens configuration, and calculate the maximum absorption practical nearfield superlenses may have. We demonstrate that in contrast to the conventional superlens picture, planar imaging is typically accompanied by excitation of surface waves at both interfaces of the lens. ©2005 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 8 September 2005; accepted 31 October 2005; published 30 November 2005
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?APPLAB/87/231113/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (154 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 42.79.Bh
    Optical lenses, prisms and mirrors
  • 42.15.Eq
    Optical system design
  • YEAR: 2005

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0003-6951 (print)   1077-3118 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (25)
View in Separate Window/Tab
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. V. G. Veselago, Sov. Phys. Usp. 10, 509 (1968).
  2. J. B. Pendry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3966 (2000).
  3. P. V. Parimi, W. T. Lu, P. Vodo, and S. Sridhar, Nature (London) 426, 404 (2003).
  4. A. Grbic and G. V. Eleftheriades, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 117403 (2004).
  5. V. A. Podolskiy and E. E. Narimanov, Phys. Rev. B 71, 201101(R) (2005);
    6. A. Govyadinov and V. Podolskiy (unpublished).
  6. N. Fang, H. Lee, C. Sun, and X. Zhang, Science 308, 534 (2005).
  7. W. Park and J.-B. Lee, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 4845 (2004).
  8. N. Garcia and M. Nieto-Vesperinas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 207403 (2002).
  9. J. Pendry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 099701 (2003).
  10. M. Nieto-Vesperinas and N. Garcia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 099702 (2003).
  11. D. R. Smith, D. Schurig, M. Rosenbluth, S. Schultz, S. A. Ramakrishna, and J. B. Pendry, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 1506 (2003).
  12. R. Merlin, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 1290 (2004).
  13. K. J. Webb, M. Yang, D. W. Ward, and K. A. Nelson, Phys. Rev. B 70, 035602(R) (2004);
    14. M.-C. Yang and K. J. Webb, Opt. Lett. 30, 2382 (2005).
  14. I. A. Larkin and M. I. Stockman, Nano Lett. 5, 339 (2005).
  15. V. A. Podolskiy and E. E. Narimanov, Opt. Lett. 30, 75 (2005).
  16. G. Shvets, Proc. SPIE 5221, 124 (2003);
    17. G. Shvets and Y. A. Urzhumov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 243902 (2004);
    G. Shvets and Y. A. Urzhumov, J. Opt. A, Pure Appl. Opt. 7, S23 (2005).
  17. E. Cubukcu, K. Aydin, E. Ozbay, S. Foteinopolou, and C. M. Soukoulis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 207401 (2003).
  18. A. L. Pokrovsky and A. L. Efros, Appl. Opt. 42, 5701 (2003).
  19. G. Milton, N.-A. Nicorovici, R. McPhedran, and V. Podolskiy, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 461, 3999 (2005);
    20. N.-A. Nicorovici, R. McPhedran, and G. Milton, Phys. Rev. B 49, 8479 (1994).
  20. N. Kuhta, G. Milton, and V. Podolskiy (unpublished).
  21. J.W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics (Roberts & Company, Greenwood Village, CO, 2004);
    22. M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics, 7th ed. (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2003).
  22. Note that for all practical applications epsilon[double-prime],µ[double-prime]>~10–6 this condition is achievable only in near-field a,b<lambda.
  23. Some applications may require a nonzero distance between the back surface lens and the image plane. In these systems, the a=b configuration is unachievable and the optimal configuration that minimizes b will need to be selected accordingly.
  24. V. A. Podolskiy, A. K. Sarychev, and V. M. Shalaev, Opt. Express 11, 735 (2003).
  25. S. Linden, C. Enkrich, M. Wegener, J. Zhou, T. Koschny, and C. M. Soukoulis, Science 306, 1351 (2004).

CITING ARTICLES
For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.


Copyright © American Institute of Physics