Applied Physics Letters
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Local environment of a diluted element under high pressure: Zn1−xMnxO probed by fluorescence x-ray absorption spectroscopy
The authors report on x-ray absorption measurements performed on Zn1−xMnxO (x=0.05,0.25) at the Mn K edge (6539  eV) under high pressure. Mn is found to substitute for Zn both in the l...
Next Article
Threading dislocation reduction by SiGeC domains in SiGe/SiGeC heterostructure: Role of pure edge dislocations
The authors previously reported an unusual phenomenon of strain relaxation accompanied by a reduction in threading dislocation density (TDD) on a Si0.77Ge0.23 layer grown on top of alternating layers ...

Methyl monolayers improve the fracture strength and durability of silicon nanobeams

Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 231905 (2006); doi:10.1063/1.2400180

Published 4 December 2006

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Tuncay Alan and Alan T. Zehnder
Department of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853

Debodhonyaa Sengupta and Melissa A. Hines
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853
Monolayer-thick coatings have a significant effect on the fracture strength and durability of 210-nm-thick, smooth (~0.4  nm rms roughness), single crystal silicon nanobeams. The initial Weibull fracture strength of beams terminated with a methyl (CH3) monolayer was 18.2  GPa. This strength did not degrade after a 23-day exposure to air. In contrast, beams terminated with a monolayer of hydrogen atoms were initially weaker than methyl-terminated beams, and their strength degraded rapidly in air. After a 23-day air exposure, the strength of H-terminated beams was reduced by at least 30%. Since strength durability is correlated with the oxidation resistance of the monolayers, the degradation of H-terminated beams is attributed to the formation of oxide nuclei that act as local stress concentrators. ©2006 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 30 August 2006; accepted 24 October 2006; published 4 December 2006
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?APPLAB/89/231905/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$28)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (203 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 81.40.Np
    Fatigue, embrittlement, fracture, and failure including corrosion fatigue and cracking
  • 62.20.Mk
    Fatigue, brittleness, fracture, and cracks
  • 68.47.Pe
    Langmuir–Blodgett films on solids; polymers on surfaces; biological molecules on surfaces
  • 82.65.+r
    Surface and interface chemistry; heterogeneous catalysis at surfaces
  • 81.65.Mq
    Surface oxidation
  • YEAR: 2006

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0003-6951 (print)   1077-3118 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (18)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. W. N. Sharpe and J. Bagdahn, Mech. Mater. 36, 3 (2004).
  2. I. Chasiotis and W. G. Knauss, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 51, 1533 (2003).
  3. I. Chasiotis and W. G. Knauss, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 51, 1551 (2003).
  4. A. McCarty and I. Chasiotis, Thin Solid Films (in press).
  5. T. Tsuchiya, O. Tabata, J. Sakata, and Y. Taga, J. Microelectromech. Syst. 7, 106 (1998).
  6. T. Alan, M. A. Hines, and A. T. Zehnder, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 091901 (2006).
  7. H. Kahn, R. Ballarini, J. J. Bellante, and A. H. Heuer, Science 298, 1215 (2002).
  8. C. L. Muhlstein, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 28, 711 (2005).
  9. C. L. Muhlstein, E. A. Stach, and R. O. Ritchie, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 1532 (2002).
  10. Y. Wang, J. A. Henry, A. T. Zehnder, and M. A. Hines, J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 14270 (2003).
  11. U. Neuwald, H. E. Hessel, A. Feltz, U. Memmert, and R. J. Behm, Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 1307 (1992).
  12. L. J. Webb and N. S. Lewis, J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 5404 (2002).
  13. H. Yu, L. J. Webb, R. S. Ries, S. D. Solares, W. A. Goddard III, J. R. Heath, and N. S. Lewis, J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 671 (2005).
  14. A. Bansal, X. Li, I. Lauermann, N. S. Lewis, S. I. Yi, and W. H. Weinberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 7225 (1996).
  15. G. S. Higashi and Y. J. Chabal, in Handbook of Semiconductor Wafer Cleaning Technology, edited by W. Kern (Noyes, Park Ridge, NJ, 1993), p. 433.
  16. L. J. Webb, D. J. Michalak, J. S. Biteen, B. S. Brunschwig, A. S. Y. Chan, D. W. Knapp, H. M. Meyer III, E. J. Nemanick, M. C. Traub, and N. S. Lewis, J. Am. Chem. Soc. (in press).
  17. D. Sander and H. Ibach, Phys. Rev. B 43, 4263 (1991).
  18. G. Mende, J. Finster, D. Flamm, and D. Schulze, Surf. Sci. 128, 169 (1983).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.