Coercive fields in ultrathin BaTiO3 capacitors
Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 232909 (2006); doi:10.1063/1.2402238
Published 8 December 2006
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
Thickness-dependence of coercive field (EC) was investigated in ultrathin BaTiO3 capacitors with thicknesses (d) between 30 and 5.0 nm. The EC appears nearly independent of d below 15 nm, and decreases slowly as d increases above 15 nm. This behavior can be explained not by effects of interfacial passive layers or strain relaxation, but by domain nuclei formation models. Based on domain nuclei formation models, the observed EC behavior is explainable via a quantitative level. A crossover of domain shape from a half-prolate spheroid to a cylinder is also suggested at d~15 nm, exhibiting good agreement with experimental results.
©2006 American Institute of Physics
| History: | Received 18 August 2006; accepted 19 October 2006; published 8 December 2006 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?APPLAB/89/232909/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
RELATED DATABASES
PUBLICATION DATA
0003-6951 (print)
1077-3118 (online)
REFERENCES (21)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- J. F. Scott, Ferroelectric Memories (Springer, New York, 2000).
- J. F. M. Cillessen, M. W. J. Prins, and R. W. Wolf, J. Appl. Phys. 81, 2777 (1997).
- P. K. Larsen, G. J. M. Dormans, D. J. Taylor, and P. J. van Veldhoven, J. Appl. Phys. 76, 2405 (1994).
- A. K. Tagantsev and I. A. Stolichnov, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 1326 (1999).
- A. K. Tagantsev, M. Landivar, E. Colla, and N. Setter, J. Appl. Phys. 78, 2623 (1995).
- N. Yanase, K. Abe, N. Fukushima, and T. Kawakubo,
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 38, 5305 (1999) . - N. A. Pertsev, J. Rodríguez Contréras, V. G. Kukhar, B. Hermanns, H. Kohlstedt, and R. Waser, Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 3356 (2003).
- S. Ducharme, V. M. Fridkin, A. V. Bune, S. P. Palto, L. M. Blinov, N. N. Petukhova, and S. G. Yudin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 175 (2000).
- A. M. Bratkovsky and A. P. Levanyuk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 019701 (2001).
- R. L. Moreira, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 179701 (2002).
- R. Landauer, J. Appl. Phys. 28, 227 (1957).
- H. F. Kay and J. W. Dunn,
Philos. Mag. 7, 2027 (1962) . - Y. S. Kim, D. H. Kim, J. D. Kim, Y. J. Chang, T. W. Noh, J. H. Kong, K. Char, Y. D. Park, S. D. Bu, J.-G. Yoon, and J.-S. Chung, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 102907 (2005).
- Y. S. Kim, J. Y. Jo, D. J. Kim, Y. J. Chang, J. H. Lee, T. W. Noh, T. K. Song, J.-G. Yoon, J.-S. Chung, S. I. Baik, Y.-W. Kim, and C. U. Chung, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 072909 (2006).
- N. A. Pertsev, A. G. Zembilgotov, and A. K. Tagantsev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1988 (1998).
- R. Mehta, B. D. Silverman, and J. T. Jacobs, J. Appl. Phys. 44, 3379 (1973).
- D. J. Kim, J. Y. Jo, Y. S. Kim, Y. J. Chang, J. S. Lee, Jong-Gul Yoon, T. K. Song, and T. W. Noh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 237602 (2005).
- T. Tybell, P. Paruch, T. Giamarchi, and J.-M. Triscone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 097601 (2002).
- J. Y. Jo, D. J. Kim, Y. S. Kim, S.-B. Choe, T. K. Song, J.-G. Yoon, and T. W. Noh, Phys. Rev. Lett. (in press).
- Z.-G. Ban and S. P. Alpay, J. Appl. Phys. 91, 9288 (2002).
- J. Padilla, W. Zhong, and D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B 53, R5969 (1996).







