Applied Physics Letters
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Ab initio studies of arsenic and boron related defects in silicon mesa diodes
E centers are known to diffuse around 400  K in Si and may then form larger donor-vacancy defects such as As2V in heavily doped n-type Si doped with As or AsBV if they diffuse into p-type re...
Next Article
Thermomigration in flip-chip SnPb solder joints under alternating current stressing
Thermomigration in flip-chip solder joints is investigated using alternating currents and infrared microscopy to decouple it from electromigration effect. It is found that the thermal gradient in sold...

Strong Aharonov-Bohm oscillations in GaAs two-dimensional holes

Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 152104 (2007); doi:10.1063/1.2720711

Published 10 April 2007

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

B. Habib, E. Tutuc, and M. Shayegan
Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544
The authors measured Aharonov-Bohm resistance oscillations [Phys. Rev. 115, 485 (1959)] in a shallow two-dimensional GaAs hole ring structure, defined by local anodic surface oxidation. The amplitude of the oscillations is about 10% of the ring resistance, the strongest seen in a hole system. In addition the authors observe resistance oscillations as a function of front gate bias at zero magnetic field. They authors discuss the results in light of spin interference in the ring and possible applications to spintronics. ©2007 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 26 December 2006; accepted 6 March 2007; published 10 April 2007
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?APPLAB/90/152104/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$28)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (287 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 73.23.-b
    Electronic transport in mesoscopic systems
  • 72.20.Fr
    Low-field transport and mobility; piezoresistance (semiconductors/insulators)
  • 72.20.My
    Galvanomagnetic and other magnetotransport effects (semiconductors/insulators)
  • 72.80.Ey
    Electrical conductivity of III–V and II–VI semiconductors
  • 81.65.Mq
    Surface oxidation
  • YEAR: 2007

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0003-6951 (print)   1077-3118 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (18)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 115, 485 (1959).
  2. G. Timp, A. M. Chang, J. E. Cunningam, T. Y. Chang, P. Mankiewich, R. Behringer, and R. E. Howard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2814 (1987);
  3. W. X. Gao, K. Ismail, K. Y. Lee, J. O. Chu, and S. Washburn, Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 3114 (1994);
    J. Appenzeller, T. Schäpers, H. Hardtdegen, B. Lengeler, and H. Lüth, Phys. Rev. B 51, 4336 (1995).
  4. J. B. Yau, E. P. De Poortere, and M. Shayegan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 146801 (2002).
  5. The amplitude of the oscillations depends exponentially on the ring radius; F. P. Milliken, S. Washburn, C. P. Umbach, R. B. Laibowitz, and R. A. Webb, Phys. Rev. B 36, 4465 (1987).
  6. J. P. Lu, J. B. Yau, S. P. Shukla, M. Shayegan, L. Wissinger, U. Rössler, and R. Winkler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1282 (1998).
  7. J. Nitta, F. Meijer, and H. Takayanagi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 695 (1999).
  8. M. Ishii and K. Matsumoto, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 34, 1329 (1995).
  9. R. Held, T. Vancura, T. Heinzel, K. Ensslin, M. Holland, and W. Wescheider, Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 262 (1998).
  10. L. P. Rokhinson, D. C. Tsui, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Superlattices Microstruct. 32, 99 (2002).
  11. B. Grbic, R. Leturcq, K. Ensslin, D. Reuter, and A. D. Wieck, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 232108 (2005).
  12. In 2D electron systems, ring structures have been defined by the LAO technique. See, e.g., A. Fuhrer, S. Luescher, T. Ihn, T. Heinzel, K. Ensslin, W. Wegscheider, and M. Bichler, Nature (London) 413, 822 (2001);
  13. U. F. Keyser, S. Borck, R. J. Haug, W. Wegscheider, M. Bichler, and G. Abstreiter, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 17, 22 (2002).
  14. R. Capozza, D. Giuliano, P. Lucignano, and A. Tagliacozzo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 226803 (2005).
  15. J. Nitta, T. Akazaki, H. Takayanagi, and T. Enoki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1335 (1997).
  16. In Ref. 6 where a simple Rashba model is used, the modulation in conductance is described in terms of a change in a spin-orbit inter-action parameter, alpha=kd[h-bar]2/m*. See, e. g., T. Koga, J. Nitta, and M. Van Veenhuizen, Phys. Rev. B 70, 161302 (2004).
  17. M. König, A. Tschetschetkin, E. M. Hankiewicz, J. Sinova, V. Hock, V. Daumer, M. Schäfer, C. R. Becker, H. Buhmann, and L. W. Molenkamp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 076804 (2006).
  18. D. Culcer, C. Lechner, and R. Winkler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 106601 (2006).
  19. S. Pedersen, A. E. Hansen, A. Kristensen, C. B. Sørensen, and P. E. Lindelof, Phys. Rev. B 61, 5457 (2000).
  20. In order to incorporate spin splitting in the simulations for low density, we assume a density dependent kd which is deduced from Fig. 6.12 in R. Winkler, Spin-Orbit Coupling Effects in Two-Dimensional Electron and Hole Systems (Springer, Berlin, 2003), Chap. 6, 107.

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.