Low-threshold surface-passivated photonic crystal nanocavity laser
Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 071124 (2007); doi:10.1063/1.2769957
Published 17 August 2007
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
The efficiency and operating range of a photonic crystal laser are improved by passivating the In–GaAs quantum well gain medium and GaAs membrane using a (NH4)S treatment. The passivated laser shows a fourfold reduction in nonradiative surface recombination rate, resulting in a fourfold reduction in lasing threshold. A three-level carrier dynamics model explains the results and shows that typical parameters of such lasers lead to a lasing threshold as much determined by surface recombination as by the overall impact of the cavity quality factor. Surface passivation therefore appears crucial in operating such lasers under practical conditions.
©2007 American Institute of Physics
| History: | Received 22 March 2007; accepted 19 July 2007; published 17 August 2007 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?APPLAB/91/071124/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
RELATED DATABASES
PUBLICATION DATA
0003-6951 (print)
1077-3118 (online)
REFERENCES (17)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- O. Painter, R. Lee, A. Scherer, A. Yariv, J. O'Brien, P. Dapkus, and I. Kim,
Science 284, 1819 (1999) . - D. Englund, H. Altug, and J. Vuckovic, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 071126 (2007).
- H. Altug, D. Englund, and J. Vučković,
Nat. Phys. 2, 484 (2006) . - H. Oigawa, J. F. Fan, Y. Nannichi, H. Sugahara, and M. Oshima,
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 30, 322 (1991) . - D. Y. Petrovykh, M. Yang, and L. Whitman,
Surf. Sci. 523, 231 (2002) . - Va is the pump active volume,
p is the cavity angular frequency,
p=Q/
p is the cavity ring-down time, G(N), is the gain; 
0.16 is the gain confinement factor for cavity mode with four 8 nm QWs,
is the pump power absorption ratio,
r is the SE lifetime in unpatterned QW,
PC,nr is the NR lifetime in PC, and
E,f,
E,r, and
E,nr are the lifetimes of pump-level relaxation, SE, and NR transitions. - D. Englund, D. Fattal, E. Waks, G. Solomon, B. Zhang, T. Nakaoka, Y. Arakawa, Y. Yamamoto, and J. Vučković, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 013904 (2005).
- D. Englund, A. Faraon, B. Zhang, Y. Yamamoto, and J. Vuckovic,
Opt. Express 15, 5550 (2007) . - K. Tai, T. R. Hayes, S. L. McCall, and W. T. Tsang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 302 (1988).
- G. Beister and H. Wenzel,
Semicond. Sci. Technol. 19, 494 (2004) . - S. Y. Hu, S. W. Corzine, K.-K. Law, D. B. Young, A. C. Gossard, and L. A. Coldren, J. Appl. Phys. 76, 4479 (1994).
- S. M. Sze, Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 2nd ed. (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1981), p. 57.
- M. Boroditsky, I. Gontijo, M. Jackson, R. Vrijen, E. Yablonovitch, T. Krauss, C.-C. Cheng, A. Scherer, R. Bhat, and M. Krames, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 3497 (2000).
- K. Hennessy, A. Badolato, A. Tamboli, P. Petroff, E. Hu, M. Atature, J. Dreiser, and A. Imamoglu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 021108 (2005).
- G. Björk and Y. Yamamoto,
IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 27, 2386 (1991) . - L. A. Coldren and S. W. Corzine, Diode Lasers and Photonic Integrated Circuits (Wiley, New York, 1995), Chap. 4.
- D. Y. Petrovykh, J. P. Long, and L. J. Whitman, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 242105 (2005).







