Applied Physics Letters
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Integrating optics and microfluidics for time-correlated single-photon counting in lab-on-a-chip devices
The authors describe the integration of low-loss optical waveguides with lab-on-a-chip structures to produce an integrated optical-microfluidic platform for time-correlated single-photon counting of f...
Next Article
Photodetector with artificial atoms of silicon
The authors demonstrate a potential application of quantum dots for the detection of photons, showing that the Coulomb interaction resulting from the capture of photoexcited carriers by quantum dots p...

Low-threshold surface-passivated photonic crystal nanocavity laser

Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 071124 (2007); doi:10.1063/1.2769957

Published 17 August 2007

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Dirk Englund
Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305

Hatice Altug
Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215

Jelena Vučković
Ginzton Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
The efficiency and operating range of a photonic crystal laser are improved by passivating the In–GaAs quantum well gain medium and GaAs membrane using a (NH4)S treatment. The passivated laser shows a fourfold reduction in nonradiative surface recombination rate, resulting in a fourfold reduction in lasing threshold. A three-level carrier dynamics model explains the results and shows that typical parameters of such lasers lead to a lasing threshold as much determined by surface recombination as by the overall impact of the cavity quality factor. Surface passivation therefore appears crucial in operating such lasers under practical conditions. ©2007 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 22 March 2007; accepted 19 July 2007; published 17 August 2007
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?APPLAB/91/071124/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$28)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (205 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 42.55.Tv
    Photonic crystal lasers and coherent effects
  • 42.60.Lh
    Laser efficiency, stability, gain, and other operational parameters
  • 42.60.Da
    Laser resonators, cavities, amplifiers, arrays, and rings
  • YEAR: 2007

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0003-6951 (print)   1077-3118 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (17)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. O. Painter, R. Lee, A. Scherer, A. Yariv, J. O'Brien, P. Dapkus, and I. Kim, Science 284, 1819 (1999).
  2. D. Englund, H. Altug, and J. Vuckovic, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 071126 (2007).
  3. H. Altug, D. Englund, and J. Vučković, Nat. Phys. 2, 484 (2006).
  4. H. Oigawa, J. F. Fan, Y. Nannichi, H. Sugahara, and M. Oshima, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 30, 322 (1991).
  5. D. Y. Petrovykh, M. Yang, and L. Whitman, Surf. Sci. 523, 231 (2002).
  6. Va is the pump active volume, omegap is the cavity angular frequency, taup=Q/omegap is the cavity ring-down time, G(N), is the gain; Gamma[approximate]0.16 is the gain confinement factor for cavity mode with four 8  nm QWs, eta is the pump power absorption ratio, taur is the SE lifetime in unpatterned QW, tauPC,nr is the NR lifetime in PC, and tauE,f, tauE,r, and tauE,nr are the lifetimes of pump-level relaxation, SE, and NR transitions.
  7. D. Englund, D. Fattal, E. Waks, G. Solomon, B. Zhang, T. Nakaoka, Y. Arakawa, Y. Yamamoto, and J. Vučković, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 013904 (2005).
  8. D. Englund, A. Faraon, B. Zhang, Y. Yamamoto, and J. Vuckovic, Opt. Express 15, 5550 (2007).
  9. K. Tai, T. R. Hayes, S. L. McCall, and W. T. Tsang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 302 (1988).
  10. G. Beister and H. Wenzel, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 19, 494 (2004).
  11. S. Y. Hu, S. W. Corzine, K.-K. Law, D. B. Young, A. C. Gossard, and L. A. Coldren, J. Appl. Phys. 76, 4479 (1994).
  12. S. M. Sze, Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 2nd ed. (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1981), p. 57.
  13. M. Boroditsky, I. Gontijo, M. Jackson, R. Vrijen, E. Yablonovitch, T. Krauss, C.-C. Cheng, A. Scherer, R. Bhat, and M. Krames, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 3497 (2000).
  14. K. Hennessy, A. Badolato, A. Tamboli, P. Petroff, E. Hu, M. Atature, J. Dreiser, and A. Imamoglu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 021108 (2005).
  15. G. Björk and Y. Yamamoto, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 27, 2386 (1991).
  16. L. A. Coldren and S. W. Corzine, Diode Lasers and Photonic Integrated Circuits (Wiley, New York, 1995), Chap. 4.
  17. D. Y. Petrovykh, J. P. Long, and L. J. Whitman, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 242105 (2005).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.