Zener tunneling in semiconducting nanotube and graphene nanoribbon p−n junctions
Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 112106 (2008); doi:10.1063/1.2983744
Published 16 September 2008
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
A theory is developed for interband tunneling in semiconducting carbon nanotube and graphene nanoribbon p−n junction diodes. Characteristic length and energy scales that dictate the tunneling probabilities and currents are evaluated. By comparing the Zener tunneling processes in these structures to traditional Group IV and III–V semiconductors, it is proved that for identical bandgaps, carbon-based one-dimensional (1D) structures have higher tunneling currents. The high tunneling current magnitudes for 1D carbon structures suggest the distinct feasibility of high-performance tunneling-based field-effect transistors.
©2008 American Institute of Physics
| History: | Received 3 June 2008; accepted 27 August 2008; published 16 September 2008 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?APPLAB/93/112106/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
carbon nanotubes,
energy gap,
field effect transistors,
p-n junctions,
semiconductor nanotubes,
tunnelling,
Zener effect
- 73.40.Gk
Tunneling (electronic transport) - 73.40.Kp
Electrical properties of III-V semiconductor-to-semiconductor contacts, p-n junctions, and heterojunctions - 72.20.Ht
High-field transport and nonlinear effects (semiconductors/insulators) - 61.46.Fg
Structure of nanotubes - 85.30.Tv
Semiconductor field effect devices - 85.35.Kt
Nanotube devices - YEAR: 2008
RELATED DATABASES
PUBLICATION DATA
0003-6951 (print)
1077-3118 (online)
REFERENCES (16)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- P. Avouris, Z. Chen, and V. Perebeinos,
Nat. Nanotechnol. 2, 605 (2007) . - A. K. Geim and K. S. Novoselov,
Nat. Mater. 6, 183 (2007) . - S. M. Sze, Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1981), pp. 513–565.
- J. Appenzeller, Y. -M. Lin, J. Knoch, and P. Avouris, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 196805 (2004).
- J. Appenzeller, M. Radosavljevic, J. Knoch, and P. Avouris, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 048301 (2004).
- K. Bosnick, A. Gabor, and P. McEuen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 163121 (2006).
- B. Bourlon, D. C. Glattli, P. Placais, J. M. Berroir, C. Miko, L. Forro, and A. Bachtold, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 026804 (2004).
- T. Fang, A. Konar, H. Xing, and D. Jena, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 092109 (2007).
- L. Brey and H. A. Fertig, Phys. Rev. B 73, 235411 (2006).
- S. M. Sze, Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1981), pp. 537–539.
- V. V. Cheianov and V. Fal'ko, Phys. Rev. B 74, 041403(R) (2006).
- E. O. Kane, J. Appl. Phys. 32, 83 (1961).
- The temperature dependence of the bandgap of GNRs has been neglected [for CNTs, it varies
±10 meV from 0–300 K as shown in R. Capaz, C. D. Spataru, P. Tangney, M. L. Cohen, and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 036801 (2005)]. - P. Y. Yu and M. Cardona, Fundamentals of Semiconductors, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York, 1999), pp. 64–66.
- Q. Zhang, W. Zhao, and A. Seabaugh,
IEEE Electron Device Lett. 27, 297 (2006) . - W. Y. Choi, B. -G. Park, J. D. Lee, and T. -J. King,
IEEE Electron Device Lett. 28, 743 (2007) .







