Thermal contact resistance between graphene and silicon dioxide
Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 161910 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3245315
Published 23 October 2009
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
The thermal contact resistance between graphene and silicon dioxide was measured using a differential 3
method. The sample thicknesses were 1.2 (single-layer graphene), 1.5, 2.8, and 3.0 nm, as determined by atomic force microscopy. All samples exhibited approximately the same temperature trend from 42 to 310 K, with no clear thickness dependence. The contact resistance at room temperature ranges from 5.6×10−9 to 1.2×10−8 m2 K/W, which is significantly lower than previous measurements involving related carbon materials. These results underscore graphene's potential for applications in microelectronics and thermal management structures.
©2009 American Institute of Physics
method. The sample thicknesses were 1.2 (single-layer graphene), 1.5, 2.8, and 3.0 nm, as determined by atomic force microscopy. All samples exhibited approximately the same temperature trend from 42 to 310 K, with no clear thickness dependence. The contact resistance at room temperature ranges from 5.6×10−9 to 1.2×10−8 m2 K/W, which is significantly lower than previous measurements involving related carbon materials. These results underscore graphene's potential for applications in microelectronics and thermal management structures.
©2009 American Institute of Physics
| History: | Received 19 August 2009; accepted 18 September 2009; published 23 October 2009 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?APPLAB/95/161910/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
RELATED DATABASES
PUBLICATION DATA
0003-6951 (print)
1077-3118 (online)
REFERENCES (23)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- K. Geim and K. S. Novoselov,
Nature Mater. 6, 183 (2007) . - A. A. Balandin, S. Ghosh, W. Bao, I. Calizo, D. Teweldebrhan, F. Miao, and C. N. Lau,
Nano Lett. 8, 902 (2008) . - W. Jang, Z. Chen, W. Bao, C. N. Lau, and C. Dames (unpublished).
- A. J. Schmidt, X. Chen, and G. Chen, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 79, 114902 (2008).
- C. Yu, S. Saha, J. Zhou, L. Shi, A. M. Cassell, B. A. Cruden, Q. Ngo, and J. Li,
ASME J. Heat Transfer 128, 234 (2006) . - E. Pop, D. A. Mann, K. E. Goodson, and H. Dai, J. Appl. Phys. 101, 093710 (2007).
- T. Borca-Tasciuc, A. R. Kumar, and G. Chen, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 72, 2139 (2001).
- F. Miao, S. Wijeratne, Y. Zhang, U. C. Coskun, W. Bao, and C. N. Lau,
Science 317, 1530 (2007) . - M. Ishigami, J. H. Chen, W. G. Cullen, M. S. Fuhrer, and E. D. Williams,
Nano Lett. 7, 1643 (2007) . - C. Dames and G. Chen, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 76, 124902 (2005).
- J. M. Ziman, Electrons and Phonons (Oxford University Press, New York, 1960).
- W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes, 3rd ed. (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2007) p. 807.
- Y. -M. Lin and P. Avouris,
Nano Lett. 8, 2119 (2008) . - X. Li, X. Wang, L. Zhang, S. Lee, and H. Dai,
Science 319, 1229 (2008) . - H. -K. Lyeo and D. G. Cahill, Phys. Rev. B 73, 144301 (2006).
- Although Refs. 4,6 were measured under atmospheric conditions the errors due to convection losses are expected to be negligible.
- C. Dames and G. Chen, J. Appl. Phys. 95, 682 (2004).
- N. S. Snyder,
Cryogenics 10, 89 (1970) . - R. Nicklow, N. Wakabayashi, and H. G. Smith, Phys. Rev. B5, 4951 (1972).
- J. C. Duda, J. L. Smoyer, P. M. Norris, and P. E. Hopkins, Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 031912 (2009).
- R. Prasher, Phys. Rev. B 77, 075424 (2008).
- M. Freitag, M. Steiner, Y. Martin, V. Perebeinos, Z. Chen, J. C. Tsang, and P. Avouris,
Nano Lett. 9, 1883 (2009) . - R. Murali, Y. Yang, K. Brenner, T. Beck, and J. D. Meindl, Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 243114 (2009).



(L12)/




