Experimental observation of subluminal and superluminal light propagation in rhodamine 6G-doped polymethyl methacrylate
Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 171106 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3254229
Published 28 October 2009
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
Nondegenerate two-wave coupling process and group velocity change in the paraxial part of an intensity-modulated and focused transverse electromagnetic beam (TEM00 beam in the article) was observed in the rhodamine 6G(R6G)-doped polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) but not in the pure PMMA. The typical superluminal result was −5.1 m/s and the subluminal result was 9.19 m/s, respectively. Furthermore, the results provide a support to our former conclusion that nondegenerate two-wave couplinglike mechanism could be used to change the group velocity of the paraxial part of a focused TEM00 beam in materials with nondegenerate two-wave coupling process.
©2009 American Institute of Physics
| History: | Received 26 June 2009; accepted 12 September 2009; published 28 October 2009 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?APPLAB/95/171106/1 |
REFERENCES (20)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- L. V. Hau, S. E. Harris, Z. Dutton, and C. H. Behroozi,
Nature (London) 397, 594 (1999) . - A. V. Turukhin, V. S. Sudarshanam, M. S. Shahriar, J. A. Musser, B. S. Ham, and P. R. Hemmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 023602 (2001).
- C. P. Kuo, U. Osterberg, C. T. Seaton, G. I. Stegeman, and K. O. Hill,
Opt. Lett. 13, 1032 (1988) . - S. H. Lin, K. Y. Hsu, and P. Yeh,
Opt. Lett. 25, 1582 (2000) . - H. Su and S. L. Chuanga, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 061102 (2006).
- M. S. Bigelow, N. N. Lepeshkin, and R. W. Boyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 113903 (2003).
- Q. Yang, J. Seo, B. Tabibi, and H. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 063902 (2005).
- F. Gao, J. Xu, G. Zhang, F. Bo, and H. Liu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 021121 (2008).
- G. Zhang, F. Bo, R. Dong, and J. Xu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 133903 (2004).
- W. J. Tomlinson, E. A. Chandross, H. P. Weber, and G. D. Aumiller,
Appl. Opt. 15, 534 (1976) . - S. Ducharme, J. C. Scott, R. J. Twieg, and W. E. Moerner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1846 (1991).
- W. E. Moerner and S. M. Silence,
Chem. Rev. (Washington, D.C.) 94, 127 (1994) . - Y. Zhang, R. Burzynski, S. Ghosal, and M. Casstevens,
Adv. Mater. 8, 111 (1996) . - L. Yu, W. K. Chan, Z. H. Peng, and A. Gharavi,
Acc. Chem. Res. 29, 13 (1996) . - F. Havermeyer, C. Pruner, R. A. Rupp, D. W. Schubert, and E. Krätzig,
Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt. 72, 201 (2001) . - R. A. Rupp, B. Yao, Y. Zheng, N. Menke, Y. Wang, W. Dong, W. Zhao, Y. Chen, M. Fan, J. Xu, and M. Fally,
Phys. Status Solidi B 244, 2138 (2007) . - Y. Deng, Y. Sun, P. Wang, D. Zhang, X. Jiao, H. Ming, Q. Zhang, Y. Jiao, and X. Sun,
Chin. Phys. Lett. 24, 954 (2007) . - I. McMichael, P. Yeh, and P. Beckwith,
Opt. Lett. 13, 500 (1988) . - S. Sinha, S. Sasikumar, A. K. Ray, and K. Dasgupta,
Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt. 87, 145 (2007) . - Z. Deng, D. Qing, P. Hemmer, C. H. Raymond Ooi, M. S. Zubairy, and M. O. Scully, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 023602 (2006).







