All-optical detection of phase fronts of propagating spin waves in a Ni81Fe19 microstripe
Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 182508 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3262348
Published 6 November 2009
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
We present the determination of the wavelength and phase of propagating spin waves in magnetic microstructures made of Ni81Fe19 using the shorted end of a coplanar waveguide for local excitation. The spin wave characteristics have been measured by phase resolved Brillouin light scattering microscopy. This recently developed technique allows for the unambiguous experimental visualization of the phase structure of propagating spin waves and is employed here to magnetic microstructures. The results show an excellent agreement with the theoretically predicted spin-wave dispersion relations.
©2009 American Institute of Physics
| History: | Received 23 September 2009; accepted 19 October 2009; published 6 November 2009 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?APPLAB/95/182508/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
Brillouin spectra,
coplanar waveguides,
dispersion (wave),
iron alloys,
magnetic structure,
nickel alloys,
spin waves
- 84.40.Az
Waveguides, transmission lines, striplines - 75.30.Ds
Spin waves in magnetically ordered materials - 76.50.+g
Ferromagnetic, antiferromagnetic, and ferrimagnetic resonances; spin-wave resonance - 75.25.-j
- 78.35.+c
Brillouin and Rayleigh scattering; other light scattering (condensed matter) - YEAR: 2010
PUBLICATION DATA
0003-6951 (print)
1077-3118 (online)
REFERENCES (17)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- V. Vlaminck and M. Bailleul,
Science 322, 410 (2008) . - V. E. Demidov, S. O. Demokritov, K. Rott, P. Krzysteczko, and G. Reiss, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 252504 (2007).
- H. Schultheiss, S. Schäfer, P. Candeloro, B. Leven, B. Hillebrands, and A. N. Slavin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 047204 (2008).
- S. -M. Seo, K. -J. Lee, H. Yang, and T. Ono, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 147202 (2009).
- T. Schneider, A. A. Serga, B. Leven, B. Hillebrands, R. L. Stamps, and M. P. Kostylev, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 022505 (2008).
- R. Hertel, W. Wulfhekel, and J. Kirschner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 257202 (2004).
- D. -S. Han, S. -K. Kim, J. -Y. Lee, S. J. Hermsdoerfer, H. Schultheiss, B. Leven, and B. Hillebrands, Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 112502 (2009).
- K. Perzlmaier, G. Woltersdorf, and C. H. Back, Phys. Rev. B 77, 054425 (2008).
- V. E. Demidov, S. O. Demokritov, K. Rott, P. Krzysteczko, and G. Reiss, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 232503 (2008).
- V. E. Demidov, S. O. Demokritov, B. Hillebrands, M. Laufenberg, and P. P. Freitas, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 2866 (2004).
- J. R. Sandercock,
Opt. Commun. 2, 73 (1970) . - S. O. Demokritov, B. Hillebrands, and A. N. Slavin,
Phys. Rep. 348, 441 (2001) . - A. A. Serga, T. Schneider, B. Hillebrands, S. O. Demokritov, and M. P. Kostylev, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 063506 (2006).
- B. A. Kalinikos and A. N. Slavin,
J. Phys. C 19, 7013 (1986) . - The material parameters used for the calculation of the spin-wave dispersion are: Saturation magnetization Ms=860 G Gyromagnetic ratio:
=0.0176 GHz/Oe Exchange stiffness constant: A=1.6×10−6 erg/cm. - The effective quantization length was defined by measuring the transverse intensity profile and was found to be 1 µm for the maximum applied magnetic field (570 Oe) and decreased by approximately 200 nm when reducing the magnetic field to 180 Oe. This effect is well understood and is described in detail in Ref. 17. However, these changes in the quantization length cause only minor variations in the dispersion relation and are therefore neglected in the following calculations.
- C. Bayer, J. P. Park, H. Wang, M. Yan, C. E. Campbell, and P. A. Crowell, Phys. Rev. B 69, 134401 (2004).







