Applied Physics Letters
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Stable and reversible optoelectrical dual-mode data storage based on a ferrocenlylspiropyran molecule
A spiropyran molecule bonded with ferrocene (SPFc) was synthesized as data storage medium. Optical recording pattern was obtained through the reversible modulation of UV and visible light on the SPFc ...
Next Article
Chemical changes on the green emitter tris(8-hydroxy-quinolinato)aluminum during device aging of p-i-n-structured organic light emitting diodes
Metal organic fluorescent and phosphorescent emitters are widely used in organic light emitting devices (OLEDs). Iridium-based triplet emitters are known to undergo chemical reactions with other mater...

Influence of molecular weight on the solar cell performance of double-crystalline donor-acceptor block copolymers

Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 183308 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3257367

Published 6 November 2009

You are logged in to this journal.

Michael Sommer,1 Sven Hüttner,1,2 Ullrich Steiner,2 and Mukundan Thelakkat1
1Applied Functional Polymers and Department of Macromolecular Chemistry I, University of Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany
2Department of Physics, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0HE, United Kingdom

We investigate the influence of the molecular weight of double-crystalline donor-acceptor block copolymers comprised of poly(3-hexylthiophene) as donor and poly(perylene bisimide acrylate) as acceptor segments on the device performance of polymer solar cells. Two block copolymers 1 and 2 exhibiting different molecular weights but the same composition are compared. Block copolymer 2 with the higher molecular weight shows an improvement in the hole carrier mobility µOFET of more than two orders of magnitude, and an improvement in the external quantum efficiency of one order of magnitude reaching 31%, which is the highest reported value for a block copolymer system. ©2009 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 7 July 2009; accepted 6 October 2009; published 6 November 2009
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?APPLAB/95/183308/1
FULL TEXT OPTIONS   (FREE)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (253 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 82.35.Jk
    Copolymers, phase transitions, structure (polymer chemistry)
  • 82.45.Wx
    Polymers and organic materials in electrochemistry
  • 72.20.Fr
    Low-field transport and mobility; piezoresistance (semiconductors/insulators)
  • 72.80.Le
    Electrical conductivity of polymers; organic compounds
  • YEAR: 2009

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0003-6951 (print)   1077-3118 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (31)

  1. S. Günes, H. Neugebauer, and N. S. Sariciftci, Chem. Rev. (Washington, D.C.) 107, 1324 (2007). [MEDLINE]
  2. G. Dennler, M. C. Scharber, and C. J. Brabec, Adv. Mater. 21, 1323 (2009).
  3. H. Hoppe and N. S. Sariciftci, J. Mater. Chem. 16, 45 (2006).
  4. M. Campoy-Quiles, T. Ferenczi, T. Agostinelli, P. G. Etchegoin, Y. Kim, T. D. Anthopoulos, P. N. Stavrinou, D. D. C. Bradley, and J. Nelson, Nature Mater. 7, 158 (2008). [MEDLINE]
  5. A. R. Campbell, J. M. Hodgkiss, S. Westenhoff, I. A. Howard, R. A. Marsh, C. R. McNeill, R. H. Friend, and N. C. Greenham, Nano Lett. 8, 3942 (2008). [MEDLINE]
  6. W. Ma, C. Yang, X. Gong, K. Lee, and A. J. Heeger, Adv. Funct. Mater. 15, 1617 (2005).
  7. G. Li, V. Shrotriya, J. Huang, Y. Yao, T. Moriarty, K. Emery, and Y. Yang, Nature Mater. 4, 864 (2005).
  8. J. Peet, J. Y. Kim, N. E. Coates, W. L. Ma, D. Moses, A. J. Heeger, and G. C. Bazan, Nature Mater. 6, 497 (2007). [MEDLINE]
  9. M. M. Wienk, M. Turbiez, J. Gilot, and R. A. J. Janssen, Adv. Mater. 20, 2556 (2008).
  10. L. Schmidt-Mende, A. Fechtenkötter, K. Müllen, E. Moons, R. H. Friend, and J. D. MacKenzie, Science 293, 1119 (2001). [MEDLINE]
  11. P. E. Keivanidis, I. A. Howard, and R. H. Friend, Adv. Funct. Mater. 18, 3189 (2008).
  12. J. J. Dittmer, E. A. Marseglia, and R. H. Friend, Adv. Mater. 12, 1270 (2000).
  13. Z. Tan, E. Zhou, X. Zhan, X. Wang, Y. Li, S. Barlow, and S. R. Marder, Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 073309 (2008).
  14. F. S. Bates and G. H. Fredrickson, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 41, 525 (1990).
  15. G. Buxton and N. Clarke, Phys. Rev. B 74, 085207 (2006).
  16. S. M. Lindner and M. Thelakkat, Macromolecules 37, 8832 (2004).
  17. S. M. Lindner, S. Hüttner, A. Chiche, M. Thelakkat, and G. Krausch, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 45, 3364 (2006). [MEDLINE]
  18. M. Sommer, S. M. Lindner, and M. Thelakkat, Adv. Funct. Mater. 17, 1493 (2007).
  19. M. Sommer, A. Lang, and M. Thelakkat, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 47, 7901 (2008). [MEDLINE]
  20. Q. Zhang, A. Cirpan, T. P. Russell, and T. Emrick, Macromolecules 42, 1079 (2009).
  21. S. Rajaram, P. B. Armstrong, B. J. Kim, and J. M. J. Fréchet, Chem. Mater. 21, 1775 (2009).
  22. R. J. Kline, M. D. McGehee, E. N. Kadnikova, J. Liu, J. M. J. Fréchet, and M. F. Toney, Macromolecules 38, 3312 (2005).
  23. J. -F. Chang, J. Clark, N. Zhao, H. Sirringhaus, D. W. Breiby, J. W. Andreasen, M. M. Nielsen, M. Giles, M. Heeney, and I. McCulloch, Phys. Rev. B 74, 115318 (2006).
  24. J. Clark, C. Silva, R. H. Friend, and F. C. Spano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 206406 (2007). [ISI] [MEDLINE]
  25. U. Zhokhavets, T. Erb, G. Gobsch, M. Al-Ibrahim, and O. Ambacher, Chem. Phys. Lett. 418, 347 (2006). [Inspec]
  26. S. Huettner, M. Sommer, A. Chiche, G. Krausch, U. Steiner, M. Thelakkat, Soft Matter 5, 206 (2009).
  27. A. Zen, M. Saphiannikova, D. Neher, J. Grenzer, S. Grigorian, U. Pietsch, U. Asawapirom, S. Janietz, U. Scherf, I. Lieberwirth, and G. Wegner, Macromolecules 39, 2162 (2006).
  28. S. King, M. Sommer, S. Huettner, M. Thelakkat, and S. A. Haque, J. Mater. Chem. 19, 5436 (2009).
  29. T. J. Prosa, M. J. Winokur, J. Moulton, P. Smith, and A. J. Heeger, Macromolecules 25, 4364 (1992).
  30. S. Hugger, R. Thomann, T. Heinzel, and T. Thurn-Albrecht, Colloid Polym. Sci. 282, 932 (2004). [ISI]
  31. W. S. Shin, H. -H. Jeong, M. -K. Kim, S. -H. Jin, M. -R. Kim, J. -K. Lee, J. W. Lee, and Y. -S. Gal, J. Mater. Chem. 16, 384 (2006).