Skip navigation.

  ASMEDL.ORG »  ASME Conf. Proc. »  ISBN  0-7918-4247-9 » FUELCELL2006-97164
Adjust text size: Decrease font size Increase font size

ASME Conference Proceedings

Previous Article
Effect of Sub-Freezing Temperature on a PEM Fuel Cell
The cold-start behavior and the effect of subzero temperatures on fuel cell performance were studied using a 25-cm2 PEMFC. The fuel cell system was housed in an environmental chamber that allowed the ...
Next Article
Synthesis, Characterization, and Hydrogen-Storage Ability of Surface-Modified Multi-Wall Carbon Nanotubes
Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have attracted increasing attention because of their unique structural, mechanical, and electronic properties. Surface chemistry modifications are also useful and critical to m...

Performance Evaluation of a Thermally Integrated Fuel Cell System in the Presence of Uncertainties

Paper no. FUELCELL2006-97164 pp. 291-300 (10 pages)
doi:10.1115/FUELCELL2006-97164

ASME 2006 4th International Conference on Fuel Cell Science, Engineering and Technology (FUELCELL2006)
June 19–21, 2006 , Irvine, California, USA
Sponsor: Nanotechnology Institute
ASME 2006 Fourth International Conference on Fuel Cell Science, Engineering and Technology, Parts A and B
ISBN: 0-7918-4247-9

You are not logged into the ASME Digital Library.
Log in

Author(s):
Vasilis Tsourapas
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

Jing Sun
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

Anna Stefanopoulou
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
In this work, we focus on robustness analysis of an integrated fuel cell and fuel reforming (FCFR) system, which relies on a feedback controller to mitigate hydrogen starvation and temperature overshoot during load transitions. The fuel reformer is used to process natural gas into a hydrogen rich flow to be utilized in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEM-FC). The feedback controller uses the catalytic burner (CB) and the catalytic partial oxidizer (CPOX) temperatures as measurements and adjusts the air and fuel actuator commands to assure fast load following and high steady state efficiency. Several uncertainty sources which can potentially lead to closed loop performance deterioration are considered, including CPOX clogging, hydro-desulphurizer (HDS) clogging, fuel uncertainty and CB parameter uncertainty. Steady state and transient performance are analyzed for the different uncertainty scenarios, for both open and closed loop operation (i.e., with and without feedback control). The robustness of load following and CPOX temperature regulation of the closed loop system (feedforward and feedback controlled) is established, while the open loop system (feedforward controlled) is shown to be vulnerable to all sources of uncertainties considered.

©2006 ASME

PUBLICATION DATA

Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef ASME

There are no references.

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.